- This topic has 20 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 17 years ago by Peace.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 9, 2007 at 10:50 AM #10866November 9, 2007 at 11:16 AM #97721EugeneParticipant
It’s very unlikely to make it all the way through in its present form.
November 9, 2007 at 11:16 AM #97786EugeneParticipantIt’s very unlikely to make it all the way through in its present form.
November 9, 2007 at 11:16 AM #97791EugeneParticipantIt’s very unlikely to make it all the way through in its present form.
November 9, 2007 at 11:16 AM #97801EugeneParticipantIt’s very unlikely to make it all the way through in its present form.
November 9, 2007 at 12:26 PM #97810PeaceParticipantI think the final bill was a bi-partisan compromise and the legislators know that there are going to be a LOT of pissed off constituents if something isn’t done.
We were first hit with the AMT in 1987 – it was so unheard of that our accountant wasn’t even aware of it (got a bill + penalty later). I think I saw that it would affect 21 million people this year.
November 9, 2007 at 12:26 PM #97817PeaceParticipantI think the final bill was a bi-partisan compromise and the legislators know that there are going to be a LOT of pissed off constituents if something isn’t done.
We were first hit with the AMT in 1987 – it was so unheard of that our accountant wasn’t even aware of it (got a bill + penalty later). I think I saw that it would affect 21 million people this year.
November 9, 2007 at 12:26 PM #97802PeaceParticipantI think the final bill was a bi-partisan compromise and the legislators know that there are going to be a LOT of pissed off constituents if something isn’t done.
We were first hit with the AMT in 1987 – it was so unheard of that our accountant wasn’t even aware of it (got a bill + penalty later). I think I saw that it would affect 21 million people this year.
November 9, 2007 at 12:26 PM #97736PeaceParticipantI think the final bill was a bi-partisan compromise and the legislators know that there are going to be a LOT of pissed off constituents if something isn’t done.
We were first hit with the AMT in 1987 – it was so unheard of that our accountant wasn’t even aware of it (got a bill + penalty later). I think I saw that it would affect 21 million people this year.
November 9, 2007 at 1:00 PM #97771drunkleParticipanthey, look at me, i’m a single individual with no home, no personal business, no kids, no nothing, a higher than median income and i already pay the maximum in taxes. i don’t know how to game the tax code, i’m an idiot.
November 9, 2007 at 1:00 PM #97836drunkleParticipanthey, look at me, i’m a single individual with no home, no personal business, no kids, no nothing, a higher than median income and i already pay the maximum in taxes. i don’t know how to game the tax code, i’m an idiot.
November 9, 2007 at 1:00 PM #97843drunkleParticipanthey, look at me, i’m a single individual with no home, no personal business, no kids, no nothing, a higher than median income and i already pay the maximum in taxes. i don’t know how to game the tax code, i’m an idiot.
November 9, 2007 at 1:00 PM #97854drunkleParticipanthey, look at me, i’m a single individual with no home, no personal business, no kids, no nothing, a higher than median income and i already pay the maximum in taxes. i don’t know how to game the tax code, i’m an idiot.
November 9, 2007 at 1:00 PM #97777EugeneParticipantIt’s anything but a bi-partisan compromise. Not a single Republican voted for it. Even if it gets through the Senate, Bush will veto it and Democrats don’t have Republican support to override the veto.
November 9, 2007 at 1:00 PM #97842EugeneParticipantIt’s anything but a bi-partisan compromise. Not a single Republican voted for it. Even if it gets through the Senate, Bush will veto it and Democrats don’t have Republican support to override the veto.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.