- This topic has 280 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 5 months ago by sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 21, 2009 at 10:42 AM #404485May 21, 2009 at 11:02 AM #403794CA renterParticipant
[quote=peterb]Thanks, Russ. Sounds like a logical explination of events. Cash buyers. Nice. Skin in the game.
But no move-up buyers. Sounds like sector compression is coming on strong. Wonder what this would look like if all the NOD’s (Shadow) were let loose on the market?[/quote]
I’m thinking a lot of this “cash” is from hard money loans and large investment pools.
Not organic demand. This is pent up supply, too.
May 21, 2009 at 11:02 AM #404047CA renterParticipant[quote=peterb]Thanks, Russ. Sounds like a logical explination of events. Cash buyers. Nice. Skin in the game.
But no move-up buyers. Sounds like sector compression is coming on strong. Wonder what this would look like if all the NOD’s (Shadow) were let loose on the market?[/quote]
I’m thinking a lot of this “cash” is from hard money loans and large investment pools.
Not organic demand. This is pent up supply, too.
May 21, 2009 at 11:02 AM #404285CA renterParticipant[quote=peterb]Thanks, Russ. Sounds like a logical explination of events. Cash buyers. Nice. Skin in the game.
But no move-up buyers. Sounds like sector compression is coming on strong. Wonder what this would look like if all the NOD’s (Shadow) were let loose on the market?[/quote]
I’m thinking a lot of this “cash” is from hard money loans and large investment pools.
Not organic demand. This is pent up supply, too.
May 21, 2009 at 11:02 AM #404347CA renterParticipant[quote=peterb]Thanks, Russ. Sounds like a logical explination of events. Cash buyers. Nice. Skin in the game.
But no move-up buyers. Sounds like sector compression is coming on strong. Wonder what this would look like if all the NOD’s (Shadow) were let loose on the market?[/quote]
I’m thinking a lot of this “cash” is from hard money loans and large investment pools.
Not organic demand. This is pent up supply, too.
May 21, 2009 at 11:02 AM #404497CA renterParticipant[quote=peterb]Thanks, Russ. Sounds like a logical explination of events. Cash buyers. Nice. Skin in the game.
But no move-up buyers. Sounds like sector compression is coming on strong. Wonder what this would look like if all the NOD’s (Shadow) were let loose on the market?[/quote]
I’m thinking a lot of this “cash” is from hard money loans and large investment pools.
Not organic demand. This is pent up supply, too.
May 21, 2009 at 11:15 AM #403799(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=CA renter]
Anyway, we are still waiting for low prices and **high** interest rates and **no** subsidies before we buy. It might be a long, long, long time…
[/quote]The interest rate tax deduction subsidy has been in place nearly 100 years, so you might want to change your criterion to “minimum subsidies”
May 21, 2009 at 11:15 AM #404052(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=CA renter]
Anyway, we are still waiting for low prices and **high** interest rates and **no** subsidies before we buy. It might be a long, long, long time…
[/quote]The interest rate tax deduction subsidy has been in place nearly 100 years, so you might want to change your criterion to “minimum subsidies”
May 21, 2009 at 11:15 AM #404290(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=CA renter]
Anyway, we are still waiting for low prices and **high** interest rates and **no** subsidies before we buy. It might be a long, long, long time…
[/quote]The interest rate tax deduction subsidy has been in place nearly 100 years, so you might want to change your criterion to “minimum subsidies”
May 21, 2009 at 11:15 AM #404352(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=CA renter]
Anyway, we are still waiting for low prices and **high** interest rates and **no** subsidies before we buy. It might be a long, long, long time…
[/quote]The interest rate tax deduction subsidy has been in place nearly 100 years, so you might want to change your criterion to “minimum subsidies”
May 21, 2009 at 11:15 AM #404502(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=CA renter]
Anyway, we are still waiting for low prices and **high** interest rates and **no** subsidies before we buy. It might be a long, long, long time…
[/quote]The interest rate tax deduction subsidy has been in place nearly 100 years, so you might want to change your criterion to “minimum subsidies”
May 21, 2009 at 11:39 AM #403814peterbParticipantI dont the we’ve even had income tax for a 100 years yet. Let alone the interest rate deduction from it.
May 21, 2009 at 11:39 AM #404067peterbParticipantI dont the we’ve even had income tax for a 100 years yet. Let alone the interest rate deduction from it.
May 21, 2009 at 11:39 AM #404306peterbParticipantI dont the we’ve even had income tax for a 100 years yet. Let alone the interest rate deduction from it.
May 21, 2009 at 11:39 AM #404367peterbParticipantI dont the we’ve even had income tax for a 100 years yet. Let alone the interest rate deduction from it.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.