OCR
In the MLS as 555K but tax records show 705K. My guess is that its a typo or mistake in the tax records. Its happened to clients of mine. There is no f*7Kin way that place could ever sell for 600K let alone 700K. The loan was only 355K on the purchase also.
OCR
In the MLS as 555K but tax records show 705K. My guess is that its a typo or mistake in the tax records. Its happened to clients of mine. There is no f*7Kin way that place could ever sell for 600K let alone 700K. The loan was only 355K on the purchase also.
OCR
In the MLS as 555K but tax records show 705K. My guess is that its a typo or mistake in the tax records. Its happened to clients of mine. There is no f*7Kin way that place could ever sell for 600K let alone 700K. The loan was only 355K on the purchase also.
one reason why I decided to post the finding is because I was also able to see the county transfer tax of $775, which is of course based on .11% of the purchase price of $705,000. So was that transfer tax an error as well?
one reason why I decided to post the finding is because I was also able to see the county transfer tax of $775, which is of course based on .11% of the purchase price of $705,000. So was that transfer tax an error as well?
one reason why I decided to post the finding is because I was also able to see the county transfer tax of $775, which is of course based on .11% of the purchase price of $705,000. So was that transfer tax an error as well?
I’ve heard of buyers paying extra on their tax stamps so that the public record will reflect what appears to be the higher price. I more commonly hear about it happening in San Bernardino and Riverside counties, but I suppose it could happen here, too.
I’ve heard of buyers paying extra on their tax stamps so that the public record will reflect what appears to be the higher price. I more commonly hear about it happening in San Bernardino and Riverside counties, but I suppose it could happen here, too.
