Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › $500k and 33years old, when is enough enough?
- This topic has 980 replies, 33 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 2 months ago by svelte.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 20, 2010 at 11:13 PM #644045December 20, 2010 at 11:20 PM #642946jstoeszParticipant
[quote=bearishgurl][quote=jstoesz]Haha, I am sorry for the warrantless smear. Good, get after it. Because it is nuking out there. You better be heading for baldy at least. Mammoth should have a storm total better measured in building stories than feet.[/quote]
I’m holding out to go with a group to Heavenly in early 2011 :=D[/quote]
Coming up to my new stomping grounds I see! interesting, I wonder how that plays into the calculations! I am just kidding.
December 20, 2010 at 11:20 PM #643017jstoeszParticipant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=jstoesz]Haha, I am sorry for the warrantless smear. Good, get after it. Because it is nuking out there. You better be heading for baldy at least. Mammoth should have a storm total better measured in building stories than feet.[/quote]
I’m holding out to go with a group to Heavenly in early 2011 :=D[/quote]
Coming up to my new stomping grounds I see! interesting, I wonder how that plays into the calculations! I am just kidding.
December 20, 2010 at 11:20 PM #643598jstoeszParticipant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=jstoesz]Haha, I am sorry for the warrantless smear. Good, get after it. Because it is nuking out there. You better be heading for baldy at least. Mammoth should have a storm total better measured in building stories than feet.[/quote]
I’m holding out to go with a group to Heavenly in early 2011 :=D[/quote]
Coming up to my new stomping grounds I see! interesting, I wonder how that plays into the calculations! I am just kidding.
December 20, 2010 at 11:20 PM #643734jstoeszParticipant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=jstoesz]Haha, I am sorry for the warrantless smear. Good, get after it. Because it is nuking out there. You better be heading for baldy at least. Mammoth should have a storm total better measured in building stories than feet.[/quote]
I’m holding out to go with a group to Heavenly in early 2011 :=D[/quote]
Coming up to my new stomping grounds I see! interesting, I wonder how that plays into the calculations! I am just kidding.
December 20, 2010 at 11:20 PM #644055jstoeszParticipant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=jstoesz]Haha, I am sorry for the warrantless smear. Good, get after it. Because it is nuking out there. You better be heading for baldy at least. Mammoth should have a storm total better measured in building stories than feet.[/quote]
I’m holding out to go with a group to Heavenly in early 2011 :=D[/quote]
Coming up to my new stomping grounds I see! interesting, I wonder how that plays into the calculations! I am just kidding.
December 20, 2010 at 11:21 PM #642941EugeneParticipant[quote=jstoesz]
A note about taxes. I dare you to compare the tax burden of a CA resident to a MN resident. After income tax, sales tax, gas tax…there is no comparison. Just saying, taxes are a bad subject for you. [/quote]mmkay.
Income tax. Assuming married filing jointly with 100k of income (nice round number), CA income tax, according to the online calculator, comes out to $5,008. MN does not have an online calculator, but I ran the numbers using tax brackets from bankrate.com and I got $6,485.
Sales tax. CA: 8.75%, MN (Brooklyn Park): 7.275%.
Property tax. No brainer, MN is higher (it’s going to be hard to find a state whose property taxes are lower than in CA, thank Howard Jarvis for that). Partly offset by higher house prices in CA.
Gas tax. CA: 35c/gal, MN: 27.5c/gal.
I have to call it a draw.
[quote]I ditched the MM tracts, because MN just doesn’t have the asian population to support the demographic comparison. So I took a near by Linden hills neighborhood and looked for a comparable in SD. In the NY times demographic link.[/quote]
I have no idea who buys houses in Mission Hills. Most likely not young couples with children (MH is not renown for its schools.) I used MM as a benchmark of a reasonably affordable neighborhood with good schools. Asian presence is irrelevant. If you want to prove the thesis that SD is unaffordable, you need to demonstrate safe neighborhoods in Minneapolis/Spokane/Denver which are substantially cheaper than MM.
December 20, 2010 at 11:21 PM #643012EugeneParticipant[quote=jstoesz]
A note about taxes. I dare you to compare the tax burden of a CA resident to a MN resident. After income tax, sales tax, gas tax…there is no comparison. Just saying, taxes are a bad subject for you. [/quote]mmkay.
Income tax. Assuming married filing jointly with 100k of income (nice round number), CA income tax, according to the online calculator, comes out to $5,008. MN does not have an online calculator, but I ran the numbers using tax brackets from bankrate.com and I got $6,485.
Sales tax. CA: 8.75%, MN (Brooklyn Park): 7.275%.
Property tax. No brainer, MN is higher (it’s going to be hard to find a state whose property taxes are lower than in CA, thank Howard Jarvis for that). Partly offset by higher house prices in CA.
Gas tax. CA: 35c/gal, MN: 27.5c/gal.
I have to call it a draw.
[quote]I ditched the MM tracts, because MN just doesn’t have the asian population to support the demographic comparison. So I took a near by Linden hills neighborhood and looked for a comparable in SD. In the NY times demographic link.[/quote]
I have no idea who buys houses in Mission Hills. Most likely not young couples with children (MH is not renown for its schools.) I used MM as a benchmark of a reasonably affordable neighborhood with good schools. Asian presence is irrelevant. If you want to prove the thesis that SD is unaffordable, you need to demonstrate safe neighborhoods in Minneapolis/Spokane/Denver which are substantially cheaper than MM.
December 20, 2010 at 11:21 PM #643593EugeneParticipant[quote=jstoesz]
A note about taxes. I dare you to compare the tax burden of a CA resident to a MN resident. After income tax, sales tax, gas tax…there is no comparison. Just saying, taxes are a bad subject for you. [/quote]mmkay.
Income tax. Assuming married filing jointly with 100k of income (nice round number), CA income tax, according to the online calculator, comes out to $5,008. MN does not have an online calculator, but I ran the numbers using tax brackets from bankrate.com and I got $6,485.
Sales tax. CA: 8.75%, MN (Brooklyn Park): 7.275%.
Property tax. No brainer, MN is higher (it’s going to be hard to find a state whose property taxes are lower than in CA, thank Howard Jarvis for that). Partly offset by higher house prices in CA.
Gas tax. CA: 35c/gal, MN: 27.5c/gal.
I have to call it a draw.
[quote]I ditched the MM tracts, because MN just doesn’t have the asian population to support the demographic comparison. So I took a near by Linden hills neighborhood and looked for a comparable in SD. In the NY times demographic link.[/quote]
I have no idea who buys houses in Mission Hills. Most likely not young couples with children (MH is not renown for its schools.) I used MM as a benchmark of a reasonably affordable neighborhood with good schools. Asian presence is irrelevant. If you want to prove the thesis that SD is unaffordable, you need to demonstrate safe neighborhoods in Minneapolis/Spokane/Denver which are substantially cheaper than MM.
December 20, 2010 at 11:21 PM #643729EugeneParticipant[quote=jstoesz]
A note about taxes. I dare you to compare the tax burden of a CA resident to a MN resident. After income tax, sales tax, gas tax…there is no comparison. Just saying, taxes are a bad subject for you. [/quote]mmkay.
Income tax. Assuming married filing jointly with 100k of income (nice round number), CA income tax, according to the online calculator, comes out to $5,008. MN does not have an online calculator, but I ran the numbers using tax brackets from bankrate.com and I got $6,485.
Sales tax. CA: 8.75%, MN (Brooklyn Park): 7.275%.
Property tax. No brainer, MN is higher (it’s going to be hard to find a state whose property taxes are lower than in CA, thank Howard Jarvis for that). Partly offset by higher house prices in CA.
Gas tax. CA: 35c/gal, MN: 27.5c/gal.
I have to call it a draw.
[quote]I ditched the MM tracts, because MN just doesn’t have the asian population to support the demographic comparison. So I took a near by Linden hills neighborhood and looked for a comparable in SD. In the NY times demographic link.[/quote]
I have no idea who buys houses in Mission Hills. Most likely not young couples with children (MH is not renown for its schools.) I used MM as a benchmark of a reasonably affordable neighborhood with good schools. Asian presence is irrelevant. If you want to prove the thesis that SD is unaffordable, you need to demonstrate safe neighborhoods in Minneapolis/Spokane/Denver which are substantially cheaper than MM.
December 20, 2010 at 11:21 PM #644050EugeneParticipant[quote=jstoesz]
A note about taxes. I dare you to compare the tax burden of a CA resident to a MN resident. After income tax, sales tax, gas tax…there is no comparison. Just saying, taxes are a bad subject for you. [/quote]mmkay.
Income tax. Assuming married filing jointly with 100k of income (nice round number), CA income tax, according to the online calculator, comes out to $5,008. MN does not have an online calculator, but I ran the numbers using tax brackets from bankrate.com and I got $6,485.
Sales tax. CA: 8.75%, MN (Brooklyn Park): 7.275%.
Property tax. No brainer, MN is higher (it’s going to be hard to find a state whose property taxes are lower than in CA, thank Howard Jarvis for that). Partly offset by higher house prices in CA.
Gas tax. CA: 35c/gal, MN: 27.5c/gal.
I have to call it a draw.
[quote]I ditched the MM tracts, because MN just doesn’t have the asian population to support the demographic comparison. So I took a near by Linden hills neighborhood and looked for a comparable in SD. In the NY times demographic link.[/quote]
I have no idea who buys houses in Mission Hills. Most likely not young couples with children (MH is not renown for its schools.) I used MM as a benchmark of a reasonably affordable neighborhood with good schools. Asian presence is irrelevant. If you want to prove the thesis that SD is unaffordable, you need to demonstrate safe neighborhoods in Minneapolis/Spokane/Denver which are substantially cheaper than MM.
December 20, 2010 at 11:26 PM #642951bearishgurlParticipant[quote=jstoesz][quote=bearishgurl][quote=jstoesz]Haha, I am sorry for the warrantless smear. Good, get after it. Because it is nuking out there. You better be heading for baldy at least. Mammoth should have a storm total better measured in building stories than feet.[/quote]
I’m holding out to go with a group to Heavenly in early 2011 :=D[/quote]
Coming up to my new stomping grounds I see! interesting, I wonder how that plays into the calculations! I am just kidding.[/quote]
South Tahoe became my one of my top retirement spots earlier in the year when I had to give up on (expensive) CO. I have to check on it at least once a year to make sure everything’s still in its rightful place :=] Do you realize Heavenly has made several improvements to their lifts/snowmaking equipment during summer 2010??
December 20, 2010 at 11:26 PM #643022bearishgurlParticipant[quote=jstoesz][quote=bearishgurl][quote=jstoesz]Haha, I am sorry for the warrantless smear. Good, get after it. Because it is nuking out there. You better be heading for baldy at least. Mammoth should have a storm total better measured in building stories than feet.[/quote]
I’m holding out to go with a group to Heavenly in early 2011 :=D[/quote]
Coming up to my new stomping grounds I see! interesting, I wonder how that plays into the calculations! I am just kidding.[/quote]
South Tahoe became my one of my top retirement spots earlier in the year when I had to give up on (expensive) CO. I have to check on it at least once a year to make sure everything’s still in its rightful place :=] Do you realize Heavenly has made several improvements to their lifts/snowmaking equipment during summer 2010??
December 20, 2010 at 11:26 PM #643603bearishgurlParticipant[quote=jstoesz][quote=bearishgurl][quote=jstoesz]Haha, I am sorry for the warrantless smear. Good, get after it. Because it is nuking out there. You better be heading for baldy at least. Mammoth should have a storm total better measured in building stories than feet.[/quote]
I’m holding out to go with a group to Heavenly in early 2011 :=D[/quote]
Coming up to my new stomping grounds I see! interesting, I wonder how that plays into the calculations! I am just kidding.[/quote]
South Tahoe became my one of my top retirement spots earlier in the year when I had to give up on (expensive) CO. I have to check on it at least once a year to make sure everything’s still in its rightful place :=] Do you realize Heavenly has made several improvements to their lifts/snowmaking equipment during summer 2010??
December 20, 2010 at 11:26 PM #643739bearishgurlParticipant[quote=jstoesz][quote=bearishgurl][quote=jstoesz]Haha, I am sorry for the warrantless smear. Good, get after it. Because it is nuking out there. You better be heading for baldy at least. Mammoth should have a storm total better measured in building stories than feet.[/quote]
I’m holding out to go with a group to Heavenly in early 2011 :=D[/quote]
Coming up to my new stomping grounds I see! interesting, I wonder how that plays into the calculations! I am just kidding.[/quote]
South Tahoe became my one of my top retirement spots earlier in the year when I had to give up on (expensive) CO. I have to check on it at least once a year to make sure everything’s still in its rightful place :=] Do you realize Heavenly has made several improvements to their lifts/snowmaking equipment during summer 2010??
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.