- This topic has 385 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by
paramount.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 4, 2008 at 9:54 PM #129920January 4, 2008 at 10:09 PM #129666
bearvine
ParticipantThanks TG that makes sense.
The auction listing is misleading (surprise) the pictured house is one of the former Pulte models, the home for auction is one of the Pulte homes on Anza with the Pechanga reservation backed up to it. They blew it on those homes by positioning the front of the home to the back of the hill.
January 4, 2008 at 10:09 PM #129835bearvine
ParticipantThanks TG that makes sense.
The auction listing is misleading (surprise) the pictured house is one of the former Pulte models, the home for auction is one of the Pulte homes on Anza with the Pechanga reservation backed up to it. They blew it on those homes by positioning the front of the home to the back of the hill.
January 4, 2008 at 10:09 PM #129842bearvine
ParticipantThanks TG that makes sense.
The auction listing is misleading (surprise) the pictured house is one of the former Pulte models, the home for auction is one of the Pulte homes on Anza with the Pechanga reservation backed up to it. They blew it on those homes by positioning the front of the home to the back of the hill.
January 4, 2008 at 10:09 PM #129909bearvine
ParticipantThanks TG that makes sense.
The auction listing is misleading (surprise) the pictured house is one of the former Pulte models, the home for auction is one of the Pulte homes on Anza with the Pechanga reservation backed up to it. They blew it on those homes by positioning the front of the home to the back of the hill.
January 4, 2008 at 10:09 PM #129939bearvine
ParticipantThanks TG that makes sense.
The auction listing is misleading (surprise) the pictured house is one of the former Pulte models, the home for auction is one of the Pulte homes on Anza with the Pechanga reservation backed up to it. They blew it on those homes by positioning the front of the home to the back of the hill.
January 4, 2008 at 10:30 PM #129677temeculaguy
ParticipantI agree about facing the front door into a hill/cliff and having the back of the house face the street. I didn’t know they were Pulte’s I thought some independant builder built six or seven houses. It’s hard to believe that a national builder would blow it so badly, I giggle when I drive by those and think that it could be a Seinfeld episode. George could live there and every vistor would always ask why the house faces this way, George would always claim it’s so there was a view from the back and raise his voice and get mad, then a kid would say “was your house bad, because why is it facing the corner” it’s definately a Seinfeld episode in the making. It would be fun to live there just so when you meet people and give them directions and say “just look for the house that is backwards.”
January 4, 2008 at 10:30 PM #129844temeculaguy
ParticipantI agree about facing the front door into a hill/cliff and having the back of the house face the street. I didn’t know they were Pulte’s I thought some independant builder built six or seven houses. It’s hard to believe that a national builder would blow it so badly, I giggle when I drive by those and think that it could be a Seinfeld episode. George could live there and every vistor would always ask why the house faces this way, George would always claim it’s so there was a view from the back and raise his voice and get mad, then a kid would say “was your house bad, because why is it facing the corner” it’s definately a Seinfeld episode in the making. It would be fun to live there just so when you meet people and give them directions and say “just look for the house that is backwards.”
January 4, 2008 at 10:30 PM #129852temeculaguy
ParticipantI agree about facing the front door into a hill/cliff and having the back of the house face the street. I didn’t know they were Pulte’s I thought some independant builder built six or seven houses. It’s hard to believe that a national builder would blow it so badly, I giggle when I drive by those and think that it could be a Seinfeld episode. George could live there and every vistor would always ask why the house faces this way, George would always claim it’s so there was a view from the back and raise his voice and get mad, then a kid would say “was your house bad, because why is it facing the corner” it’s definately a Seinfeld episode in the making. It would be fun to live there just so when you meet people and give them directions and say “just look for the house that is backwards.”
January 4, 2008 at 10:30 PM #129919temeculaguy
ParticipantI agree about facing the front door into a hill/cliff and having the back of the house face the street. I didn’t know they were Pulte’s I thought some independant builder built six or seven houses. It’s hard to believe that a national builder would blow it so badly, I giggle when I drive by those and think that it could be a Seinfeld episode. George could live there and every vistor would always ask why the house faces this way, George would always claim it’s so there was a view from the back and raise his voice and get mad, then a kid would say “was your house bad, because why is it facing the corner” it’s definately a Seinfeld episode in the making. It would be fun to live there just so when you meet people and give them directions and say “just look for the house that is backwards.”
January 4, 2008 at 10:30 PM #129949temeculaguy
ParticipantI agree about facing the front door into a hill/cliff and having the back of the house face the street. I didn’t know they were Pulte’s I thought some independant builder built six or seven houses. It’s hard to believe that a national builder would blow it so badly, I giggle when I drive by those and think that it could be a Seinfeld episode. George could live there and every vistor would always ask why the house faces this way, George would always claim it’s so there was a view from the back and raise his voice and get mad, then a kid would say “was your house bad, because why is it facing the corner” it’s definately a Seinfeld episode in the making. It would be fun to live there just so when you meet people and give them directions and say “just look for the house that is backwards.”
January 4, 2008 at 10:33 PM #129682paramount
ParticipantMorgan Hill @ $75/sf as some have suggested?
This is what I just pulled off the McMillin Website:
Blackstone
34359 Lamborn St Temecula 46 1B 3,284 3 beds/3.5 baths/1 stories 1/10/08 $511,955Blackstone
44562 Villa Helena St Temecula 59 1AR 3,284 3 beds/3.5 baths/1 stories Now! $508,328Montevina
33981 Parador St Temecula 123 3BR 3,239 5 beds/3 baths/2 stories Now! $499,000Montevina
34029 Galleron St Temecula 72 2CR 3,106 4 beds/2.5 baths/2 stories 1/21/08 $479,38Montevina
34079 Galleron St Temecula 68 3CR 3,239 5 beds/3 baths/2 stories 1/21/08 $487,512The cheapest is still $150/sf.
I don’t see $75/sf happening at all(@ Morgan Hill).
January 4, 2008 at 10:33 PM #129849paramount
ParticipantMorgan Hill @ $75/sf as some have suggested?
This is what I just pulled off the McMillin Website:
Blackstone
34359 Lamborn St Temecula 46 1B 3,284 3 beds/3.5 baths/1 stories 1/10/08 $511,955Blackstone
44562 Villa Helena St Temecula 59 1AR 3,284 3 beds/3.5 baths/1 stories Now! $508,328Montevina
33981 Parador St Temecula 123 3BR 3,239 5 beds/3 baths/2 stories Now! $499,000Montevina
34029 Galleron St Temecula 72 2CR 3,106 4 beds/2.5 baths/2 stories 1/21/08 $479,38Montevina
34079 Galleron St Temecula 68 3CR 3,239 5 beds/3 baths/2 stories 1/21/08 $487,512The cheapest is still $150/sf.
I don’t see $75/sf happening at all(@ Morgan Hill).
January 4, 2008 at 10:33 PM #129857paramount
ParticipantMorgan Hill @ $75/sf as some have suggested?
This is what I just pulled off the McMillin Website:
Blackstone
34359 Lamborn St Temecula 46 1B 3,284 3 beds/3.5 baths/1 stories 1/10/08 $511,955Blackstone
44562 Villa Helena St Temecula 59 1AR 3,284 3 beds/3.5 baths/1 stories Now! $508,328Montevina
33981 Parador St Temecula 123 3BR 3,239 5 beds/3 baths/2 stories Now! $499,000Montevina
34029 Galleron St Temecula 72 2CR 3,106 4 beds/2.5 baths/2 stories 1/21/08 $479,38Montevina
34079 Galleron St Temecula 68 3CR 3,239 5 beds/3 baths/2 stories 1/21/08 $487,512The cheapest is still $150/sf.
I don’t see $75/sf happening at all(@ Morgan Hill).
January 4, 2008 at 10:33 PM #129924paramount
ParticipantMorgan Hill @ $75/sf as some have suggested?
This is what I just pulled off the McMillin Website:
Blackstone
34359 Lamborn St Temecula 46 1B 3,284 3 beds/3.5 baths/1 stories 1/10/08 $511,955Blackstone
44562 Villa Helena St Temecula 59 1AR 3,284 3 beds/3.5 baths/1 stories Now! $508,328Montevina
33981 Parador St Temecula 123 3BR 3,239 5 beds/3 baths/2 stories Now! $499,000Montevina
34029 Galleron St Temecula 72 2CR 3,106 4 beds/2.5 baths/2 stories 1/21/08 $479,38Montevina
34079 Galleron St Temecula 68 3CR 3,239 5 beds/3 baths/2 stories 1/21/08 $487,512The cheapest is still $150/sf.
I don’t see $75/sf happening at all(@ Morgan Hill).
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.