- This topic has 70 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 4 months ago by blahblahblah.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 14, 2008 at 9:34 PM #257385August 15, 2008 at 9:54 AM #257615EconProfParticipant
Notice that the property taxes for 2009, and presumably annually thereafter, that this buyer will pay, are $3900.
Therein lies the reason the property is worth $1. Property taxes are inversely related to property values–a key reason CA’s Proposition 13 taxes are good for our values.
The puzzle here is why Detroit and similar cities don’t get it, and continue to drive people and businesses out of their state with high taxes and big government. Meanwhile they blame imports, discrimination, and other convenient scapegoats for their deterioration.August 15, 2008 at 9:54 AM #257567EconProfParticipantNotice that the property taxes for 2009, and presumably annually thereafter, that this buyer will pay, are $3900.
Therein lies the reason the property is worth $1. Property taxes are inversely related to property values–a key reason CA’s Proposition 13 taxes are good for our values.
The puzzle here is why Detroit and similar cities don’t get it, and continue to drive people and businesses out of their state with high taxes and big government. Meanwhile they blame imports, discrimination, and other convenient scapegoats for their deterioration.August 15, 2008 at 9:54 AM #257507EconProfParticipantNotice that the property taxes for 2009, and presumably annually thereafter, that this buyer will pay, are $3900.
Therein lies the reason the property is worth $1. Property taxes are inversely related to property values–a key reason CA’s Proposition 13 taxes are good for our values.
The puzzle here is why Detroit and similar cities don’t get it, and continue to drive people and businesses out of their state with high taxes and big government. Meanwhile they blame imports, discrimination, and other convenient scapegoats for their deterioration.August 15, 2008 at 9:54 AM #257323EconProfParticipantNotice that the property taxes for 2009, and presumably annually thereafter, that this buyer will pay, are $3900.
Therein lies the reason the property is worth $1. Property taxes are inversely related to property values–a key reason CA’s Proposition 13 taxes are good for our values.
The puzzle here is why Detroit and similar cities don’t get it, and continue to drive people and businesses out of their state with high taxes and big government. Meanwhile they blame imports, discrimination, and other convenient scapegoats for their deterioration.August 15, 2008 at 9:54 AM #257523EconProfParticipantNotice that the property taxes for 2009, and presumably annually thereafter, that this buyer will pay, are $3900.
Therein lies the reason the property is worth $1. Property taxes are inversely related to property values–a key reason CA’s Proposition 13 taxes are good for our values.
The puzzle here is why Detroit and similar cities don’t get it, and continue to drive people and businesses out of their state with high taxes and big government. Meanwhile they blame imports, discrimination, and other convenient scapegoats for their deterioration.August 18, 2008 at 9:38 AM #258262paranoidParticipanteven with all the taxes to pay, I still like to see $1 house in SD. will this ever happen? Will that be the indicator that the bottom has been reached here?
August 18, 2008 at 9:38 AM #258451paranoidParticipanteven with all the taxes to pay, I still like to see $1 house in SD. will this ever happen? Will that be the indicator that the bottom has been reached here?
August 18, 2008 at 9:38 AM #258463paranoidParticipanteven with all the taxes to pay, I still like to see $1 house in SD. will this ever happen? Will that be the indicator that the bottom has been reached here?
August 18, 2008 at 9:38 AM #258554paranoidParticipanteven with all the taxes to pay, I still like to see $1 house in SD. will this ever happen? Will that be the indicator that the bottom has been reached here?
August 18, 2008 at 9:38 AM #258510paranoidParticipanteven with all the taxes to pay, I still like to see $1 house in SD. will this ever happen? Will that be the indicator that the bottom has been reached here?
August 18, 2008 at 10:12 AM #258535EugeneParticipantThe puzzle here is why Detroit and similar cities don’t get it, and continue to drive people and businesses out of their state with high taxes and big government.
If they took $3900 and used it on competent police and public work projects, everyone would be happy.
The reality is that Detroit is a huge criminal black ghetto, and the only reason it exists is because of the government that’s willing to give people money without asking for anything in return. 3 out of 5 adults in the city of Detroit don’t have any jobs at all. They live on welfare (cash assistance, section 8, food stamps etc.) and supplement their incomes by dealing drugs and stealing from those few that still do work.
Here’s a remarkable fact: for all their distress, residents of Detroit have MORE children on average than residents of San Diego. Why? Because adults are limited in their access to welfare benefits, but our government can’t risk starving poor innocent children. So, a “single” mom with five kids can live quite happily in subsidized housing by getting all kinds of benefits for her children. (Note the quotation marks – quite often there really is a husband, but being legally married limits the access to public benefits, so they usually don’t record marriages) In turn, her daughters will start making babies of their own by the age of 15.
August 18, 2008 at 10:12 AM #258579EugeneParticipantThe puzzle here is why Detroit and similar cities don’t get it, and continue to drive people and businesses out of their state with high taxes and big government.
If they took $3900 and used it on competent police and public work projects, everyone would be happy.
The reality is that Detroit is a huge criminal black ghetto, and the only reason it exists is because of the government that’s willing to give people money without asking for anything in return. 3 out of 5 adults in the city of Detroit don’t have any jobs at all. They live on welfare (cash assistance, section 8, food stamps etc.) and supplement their incomes by dealing drugs and stealing from those few that still do work.
Here’s a remarkable fact: for all their distress, residents of Detroit have MORE children on average than residents of San Diego. Why? Because adults are limited in their access to welfare benefits, but our government can’t risk starving poor innocent children. So, a “single” mom with five kids can live quite happily in subsidized housing by getting all kinds of benefits for her children. (Note the quotation marks – quite often there really is a husband, but being legally married limits the access to public benefits, so they usually don’t record marriages) In turn, her daughters will start making babies of their own by the age of 15.
August 18, 2008 at 10:12 AM #258488EugeneParticipantThe puzzle here is why Detroit and similar cities don’t get it, and continue to drive people and businesses out of their state with high taxes and big government.
If they took $3900 and used it on competent police and public work projects, everyone would be happy.
The reality is that Detroit is a huge criminal black ghetto, and the only reason it exists is because of the government that’s willing to give people money without asking for anything in return. 3 out of 5 adults in the city of Detroit don’t have any jobs at all. They live on welfare (cash assistance, section 8, food stamps etc.) and supplement their incomes by dealing drugs and stealing from those few that still do work.
Here’s a remarkable fact: for all their distress, residents of Detroit have MORE children on average than residents of San Diego. Why? Because adults are limited in their access to welfare benefits, but our government can’t risk starving poor innocent children. So, a “single” mom with five kids can live quite happily in subsidized housing by getting all kinds of benefits for her children. (Note the quotation marks – quite often there really is a husband, but being legally married limits the access to public benefits, so they usually don’t record marriages) In turn, her daughters will start making babies of their own by the age of 15.
August 18, 2008 at 10:12 AM #258476EugeneParticipantThe puzzle here is why Detroit and similar cities don’t get it, and continue to drive people and businesses out of their state with high taxes and big government.
If they took $3900 and used it on competent police and public work projects, everyone would be happy.
The reality is that Detroit is a huge criminal black ghetto, and the only reason it exists is because of the government that’s willing to give people money without asking for anything in return. 3 out of 5 adults in the city of Detroit don’t have any jobs at all. They live on welfare (cash assistance, section 8, food stamps etc.) and supplement their incomes by dealing drugs and stealing from those few that still do work.
Here’s a remarkable fact: for all their distress, residents of Detroit have MORE children on average than residents of San Diego. Why? Because adults are limited in their access to welfare benefits, but our government can’t risk starving poor innocent children. So, a “single” mom with five kids can live quite happily in subsidized housing by getting all kinds of benefits for her children. (Note the quotation marks – quite often there really is a husband, but being legally married limits the access to public benefits, so they usually don’t record marriages) In turn, her daughters will start making babies of their own by the age of 15.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.