- This topic has 15 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by
jficquette.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 28, 2008 at 2:03 AM #13441July 28, 2008 at 2:19 AM #248045
Eugene
Participant18 million number includes all second homes and vacation homes in the U.S. It’s above average (it’s been in 14-15m range during the boom) but it’s not going to zero.
July 28, 2008 at 2:19 AM #248201Participant18 million number includes all second homes and vacation homes in the U.S. It’s above average (it’s been in 14-15m range during the boom) but it’s not going to zero.
July 28, 2008 at 2:19 AM #248205Participant18 million number includes all second homes and vacation homes in the U.S. It’s above average (it’s been in 14-15m range during the boom) but it’s not going to zero.
July 28, 2008 at 2:19 AM #248268Participant18 million number includes all second homes and vacation homes in the U.S. It’s above average (it’s been in 14-15m range during the boom) but it’s not going to zero.
July 28, 2008 at 2:19 AM #248274Participant18 million number includes all second homes and vacation homes in the U.S. It’s above average (it’s been in 14-15m range during the boom) but it’s not going to zero.
July 28, 2008 at 2:09 PM #248275cr
Participant[quote=esmith]18 million number includes all second homes and vacation homes in the U.S. It’s above average (it’s been in 14-15m range during the boom) but it’s not going to zero.[/quote]
15 million? I’m just speculating, but the majority of that number must be new or foreclosed homes, i.e. not vacation homes.
Sure they account for some of that #, but 10% of that, say 1.5 Million vacation homes would be one for every 200 people in the country (including children). Apartment complexes with 200+ units are common and my guess is if you’re living in an apt, you probably don’t have a vacation home.
I’d be surprised if even 5% of that number is vacation homes.July 28, 2008 at 2:09 PM #248433Participant[quote=esmith]18 million number includes all second homes and vacation homes in the U.S. It’s above average (it’s been in 14-15m range during the boom) but it’s not going to zero.[/quote]
15 million? I’m just speculating, but the majority of that number must be new or foreclosed homes, i.e. not vacation homes.
Sure they account for some of that #, but 10% of that, say 1.5 Million vacation homes would be one for every 200 people in the country (including children). Apartment complexes with 200+ units are common and my guess is if you’re living in an apt, you probably don’t have a vacation home.
I’d be surprised if even 5% of that number is vacation homes.July 28, 2008 at 2:09 PM #248437Participant[quote=esmith]18 million number includes all second homes and vacation homes in the U.S. It’s above average (it’s been in 14-15m range during the boom) but it’s not going to zero.[/quote]
15 million? I’m just speculating, but the majority of that number must be new or foreclosed homes, i.e. not vacation homes.
Sure they account for some of that #, but 10% of that, say 1.5 Million vacation homes would be one for every 200 people in the country (including children). Apartment complexes with 200+ units are common and my guess is if you’re living in an apt, you probably don’t have a vacation home.
I’d be surprised if even 5% of that number is vacation homes.July 28, 2008 at 2:09 PM #248496Participant[quote=esmith]18 million number includes all second homes and vacation homes in the U.S. It’s above average (it’s been in 14-15m range during the boom) but it’s not going to zero.[/quote]
15 million? I’m just speculating, but the majority of that number must be new or foreclosed homes, i.e. not vacation homes.
Sure they account for some of that #, but 10% of that, say 1.5 Million vacation homes would be one for every 200 people in the country (including children). Apartment complexes with 200+ units are common and my guess is if you’re living in an apt, you probably don’t have a vacation home.
I’d be surprised if even 5% of that number is vacation homes.July 28, 2008 at 2:09 PM #248504Participant[quote=esmith]18 million number includes all second homes and vacation homes in the U.S. It’s above average (it’s been in 14-15m range during the boom) but it’s not going to zero.[/quote]
15 million? I’m just speculating, but the majority of that number must be new or foreclosed homes, i.e. not vacation homes.
Sure they account for some of that #, but 10% of that, say 1.5 Million vacation homes would be one for every 200 people in the country (including children). Apartment complexes with 200+ units are common and my guess is if you’re living in an apt, you probably don’t have a vacation home.
I’d be surprised if even 5% of that number is vacation homes.July 28, 2008 at 7:41 PM #248395jficquette
Participant18 million homes is enough to house 50-80 million people depending on how many you cram into each.
That’s enough for 20-25% of the entire country.
That’s crazy.
John
July 28, 2008 at 7:41 PM #248553Participant18 million homes is enough to house 50-80 million people depending on how many you cram into each.
That’s enough for 20-25% of the entire country.
That’s crazy.
John
July 28, 2008 at 7:41 PM #248557Participant18 million homes is enough to house 50-80 million people depending on how many you cram into each.
That’s enough for 20-25% of the entire country.
That’s crazy.
John
July 28, 2008 at 7:41 PM #248616Participant18 million homes is enough to house 50-80 million people depending on how many you cram into each.
That’s enough for 20-25% of the entire country.
That’s crazy.
John
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.