Wait wait, where did I say what I believe? Where did I go into anything other than the source at hand, address a point that was not used in the source and has no factual evidence to support it that was being levied to to damage the reputation of a leading canadate for prez? Please use the fancy new quoteing tool to show me where I wrote what I believe.
What is the likelyhood that he divorced his wife, met, wooed, and married a beautiful and rich woman in that order in one month? About the same as me being elected prez, near nil. However, I have trouble judgeing a man based on something I suspect, but have no proof of. Especially when lit in the context of this article, which is a smear piece if ever one was written.
In politics I try to stay with what I know. Not what I suspect about someones behavior. I doubt VERY much he could look anyone in the eye and say that he has always been faithful in every second of his life without lying. Infact, id prob laugh in this face, and ask “really! damn teach me your secret! Cause no one I have ever heard of pulls that off!” That doesnt mean ill resort to slander and damage someones reputation based on nothing more than the cold hard analysis of something I know nothing about and wasnt alive to witness.
There are plenty of skeletons in McCains closet that I can form an opnion with that dont leave me resorting to “comeon, you know he did it even if we dont have any proof.”
