[quote=SD Realtor]Except I know the end users. Once more don’t try to tell me what I do and where my products go.
Furthermore I marvel at how the point is conveniently ignored because it is much easier to not address the point but attack the person bringing it up because he doesn’t agree with the policies implemented by the administration.
Very well done by many of you.
Excellent strategy.[/quote]
Ok, let’s address the actual points.
you said
Additionally there was a good point made awhile back that what is more troublesome is not the lies from the top, but the abuses performed by individuals within the system. More often then not, these are done at the benefit of the administration without the administration even knowing it.
The actual abuses? Let’s see. Fast and Furious? no abuses that benefited the administration, and none that can actually be linked to the administration.
Benghazi? Whole lot of tragedy, big empty pot of scandal.
IRS? Whole lot of nothing, and even more nothingness when measuring based on benefits to the administration. (I suspect you may have missed the evidence that there was no one-sided targeting by the IRS, the targeting went both ways.)
The “fixed” numbers in the unemployment rate? Your conclusion, “someone said” qualifies as proof, even though examining what was actually said by “someone” provided no benefit whatsoever to the administration, irrespective of whether it was actually true.
So your conclusion is that if there’s lots of smoke there must be fire. Except there isn’t. It’s been a constant barrage of throwing shit against the wall to see what sticks, nothing sticks and you STILL point to all the shit that fell to the floor as evidence.
