PD — no need to insinulate a new conspiracy here — I’m not PS! (well, if there is another meet-up and I have no conflict, I will show up so you’ll see)
I just read (or rather skimmed) the 48-report by Steven Jones (http://www.st911.org/). Again, it’s chilling. The official report doesn’t add up. Now if the official explanation (fire & heat) has real leg then it’s fairly easy to dispute all this (the report is talking about facts and how law of physics can’t explain it). But I haven’t seen any yet. I was trained in science and engineering, so I’d like to approach this as a forensic project — to find out what happened. In fact, not finding out is totoally irresponsible given that the collapses of the twin tower is the worst structural disaster (if the official story is true) so far.
Again, I thank PS because she brought this up. If true, the enormity of this is just mind-boggling!
No need to jump into an argument — just read the report, and watch some videos. Like PS, I’d like to know “the other side” of the story told in a scientifically rigorous way rather than a qucik dismal because it appears absurd. In fact, for me, now the official story appears rather absurd.
PerryChase, you said earlier that you’d do some research on this topic, please post if you find something interesting.
