Paramount, your problem is that you cannot clearly state anything that has happened. You start by calling the law the “show me your papers law”. If you are a US citizen, there are no papers to show. Very inaccurate description of the law, but you use it to try and mischaracterize the law. As I posted earlier, when traveling in Europe, you must also carry and show your immigration docs to officials and even at some hotels. I was a guest of those countries and followed their rules. No big deal.
Please explain your statement below and what suspicion-less detainment the SC affirmed.
Paramount stated: What I’m referring to is suspicion-less detainment and seizures that the activist supreme court eagerly affirmed in part to strengthen the police state agenda.
No such thing was done. Only after a lawful stop or encounter can a law enforcement officer determine immigration status. If they ask for “papers”, they are only referring to legal immigrants who are already required to carry and show their immigration docs as a condition of being here. They are free not to “carry papers” back in their own
country.
If stops or encounters are unlawful, those need to be taken to court.
You are king of the straw man argument. Get your facts straight and then someone can have a rational discussion with you.
