[quote=njtosd][quote=SK in CV][quote=njtosd]
I said potential crime – sexting with a 15 year old and sending lewd images is a problem, which is the reason Weiner’s being investigated. Poor judgement – hmm. Let’s say this – I hope my daughters never even date people like Bill Clinton or Anthony Weiner.[/quote]
So you’re saying that Secretary Clinton is “potentially” guilty of something because of something that Weiner did? She is guilty of poor judgment because someone who is married to her employee did something despicable? Really? Am I guilty of bad judgement because one of my high school buddies, and groomsman at my wedding, was later convicted of a crime and did time in a federal prison? Is my wife, who I married more than 30 year later, also guilty of bad judgement?[/quote]
Go back and read what I wrote. I specifically said a potential crime by a close Clinton connection. Why do you (and BG for that matter) keep trying to change what people say? I guess because doing so strengthens the arguments that you want to make. I don’t know whether you or your wife exhibited bad judgment – that’s for the two of you to figure out.[/quote]
And you also said “And it also reinforces the notion that both Hillary and her closest aid have (a) willful blindness, (b) poor judgment …”
I was responding to your including Secretary Clinton. I did not change anything you said. They’re your words.
