I have a bad feeling about 11/8

[SK in CV]

[quote=mixxalot]Hillary will steal the election and win even though Trump will win the popular vote. The global elites want their puppet to win.[/quote]

Good one.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=SK in CV][quote=bearishgurl]SK, you must know that the FBI would not have stated that they were “reopening” (I know you don’t like to call it that but it fits) HRC’s investigation into her e-mail server unless they found some damning evidence on Huma’s laptop or phone. Like it or not, HRC, Huma (and as byproducts) Anthony and Bill are all interconnected. Two of them have been very close for ~20 years and the 4 of them were like One Big Happy Family. Bill actually married Huma and Anthony in 2010.

When one routinely rolls in the mud with their friends and “partners,” they will eventually get someone else’s dirt all over themselves. That’s how it works.[/quote]

The FBI didn’t say they were “reopening”, so no, it doesn’t fit. The FBI doesn’t close cases. They also said they don’t know what is in the emails. So if they don’t know, you can’t possibly even guess that they’re damning. More likely, it’s not the specific content of the emails, in fact, the FBI has acknowledged that all the emails they’re currently referring to (which may be as few as 3) could be emails they’ve already examined.

Weiner is a loser. Bill Clinton is one of the best past presidents the country has ever had. There is no evidence that Huma is anything but an outstanding employee and person. Secretary Clinton’s accomplishments speak for themselves. The dozens of scandals she’s been accused of are nothing more than empty accusations. So, I have no idea what “mud” you’re referring to. Based on your history here, best guess is you’re just making more shit up, so as to not look foolish again. Doesn’t really work very well.[/quote]SK, I’m puzzled at why you are constantly compelled to defend HRC on THIS forum. The bulk of the readers of this forum (90%?) live (and are registered to vote) in CA. Unlike your (adopted) home state of AZ, CA is a “deep blue” state. If every single illegal alien who (accidentally on purpose) was successfully registered to vote at HRC’s 70-80 “tabling events” held throughout the Golden state during the primary season, if wouldn’t matter as to the outcome on November 9. If +/- 2M nonresidents (using their “fake” US addresses at the time of registering to vote) actually made it across the border on 11/8 in a timely manner to pick up their Voter Guides and vote for HRC at their “assigned” SD County polling places, it wouldn’t matter. There are so many of the “liberal elite” residing within the state of CA who would vote against Trump even if Bozo the Clown was running against him on the Democratic ticket. Yes, even if 2M nonresidents successfully crossed the border on 11/8 and were able to successfully vote at their assigned “home polling places” in San Diego County, IT WOULDN’T MATTER as to the outcome of the election! I personally witnessed one event held on a Saturday morning in May of this year by Bill Clinton right here in Chula Vista (their “tabling event” was held IN SPANISH at the student theatre, in the rear of the HS campus). I personally cruised the HUGE student parking lot (as well as the adjacent parking lot of SWC that the rallygoers were using when the rally was already in progress). The verdict was that ~70% of the license plates of vehicles carrying people attending such rally were from …. (drumroll) …. Baja CA Norte. Is anyone surprised??

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/oct/11/critics-predict-new-california-motor-voter-law-wil/

According to the (1/1/06) “CA Motor Voter Law,” illegal aliens can legally use a PO Box for an address on their new CA Driver Licenses (used to identify themselves as “CA residents for voter registration purposes) while US citizen residents must furnish a street address on their Driver License applications. The reasoning behind this decision is that is was “unfair” to require illegal aliens to furnish a bonafide street address to the DMV on their DL applications because many of them live on their employer’s land in employer-owned trailers (agricultural workers) and thus don’t have an actual street address of their own.

SK, you’re preaching to the choir here on Piggington whilst defending HRC at nearly every opportunity when you could be focused on your OWN RED STATE of AZ! Don’t you belong to any AZ blogs? You could be posting HRC’s “virtues” there instead of here and actually be “successful” in getting her more votes! This is sincerely coming from a former longtime DEM activist! I’ll readily admit that the electoral votes in CA will go to HRC and there is nothing ANYONE can do about that in this election cycle. The thousands of staunch “Dem activists” who reside in the nearly 10M-strong SF Bay area have seen to that. Oh, and you should know that they can (and will) travel! Hello, Nevada! There is no one on this board that knows this better than ME. I’m FROM the bay area, for G@d’s sake!

Sure, there are CA counties that have historically voted REP. Namely, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, Colusa, Del Norte, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Inyo, Kern, Kings, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Modoc, Nevada, Orange, Placer, Plumas, Riverside, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Sutter, Tehama, Trinity, Tuolumne and Yuba. HOWEVER, the VAST MAJORITY of the above counties DONT HAVE ENOUGH REGISTERED VOTERS IN THEM to even MATTER in the general election.

So there you have it. Let’s get down to brass tacks here. CA has been for many years and is now a DEEP BLUE STATE. The Trump campaign is NOT GOING TO SPEND A DIME in the Golden State, nor should they. So you don’t have to jump in here at every perceived opportunity and try to defend the undefensible. It is wholly unnecessary, especially at this late date … and the Piggs are smart enough to make up their own minds.

Like Michelle Obama stated on the campaign trail on behalf of her spouse, Barack, in 2007 (and in reference to HRC), “If you can’t run your own house, you certainly can’t run the White House.”

So true.

Doesn’t the AZ Republic have a blog or comments section? If so, are you registered for it? If not, why not? You would do well do get on it TOMORROW MORNING and start posting if you want to make a DIFFERENCE in this election. You’re wasting your time here.

[njtosd]

[quote=bearishgurl][quote=njtosd][quote=bearishgurl][quote=njtosd] . . . Emotionally, though, this brings front and center a very distasteful potential crime by a close Clinton connection. And it also reinforces the notion that both Hillary and her closest aid have (a) willful blindness, (b) poor judgment or (c) something else when it comes to what would normally be considered one of the most important relationships in their lives . . .[/quote]That something else is an obvious codependency. Did Huma learn this behavior from her mentor, HRC, whom she has been attached to at the hip since she was an (impressionable) 19-20 years old? She had no shortage of very powerful executives as well as celebrities fawning all over her when she was a single up and coming politico! I can’t for the life of me understand what she saw in Weiner. But I digress ….

I note Huma isn’t traveling with HRC today. As it should be. She needs to go into hiding right now and schedule a “come to Jes*s convo” with her counsel in the coming week. The Clinton campaign can pay the retainer. She should also seek therapy asap on why she felt “trapped” into staying with “Mr. Danger” fully 5 years and 2 months past his “sell-by date” and have a baby with him in the interim, all the while being repeatedly humiliated by the relentless media fallout from his sordid “sexual phone forays.”

HRC well knew all of this and had to have known Huma was working at home and that her esteemed spouse, “Mr. Danger” was under investigation by the FBI over soliciting sexual favors from minors online and had seized his family’s computers and cell phones. Still …. she kept Huma on and didn’t bother to ask or see what State Dept matters might have been stored on her “right-hand woman’s” (now seized) computer or question her if she erased any of it before her computers were seized by the FBI. Huma was in charge of putting ALL of HRC’s e-mails into folders and/or moving them to other hard drives or the cloud. As such, HRC deserves all of the fallout she is getting. She is too careless with the safeguarding of US government e-mails, and as a byproduct, America’s secrets . . . yes, even at this late date. The buck stops with HER.[/quote]

Once again, BG, you have misquoted me by adding emphasis where there was none. It really riles me – I have explained on a couple of occasions now in painfully clear terms that I resent your misrepresentations. So have other people. Stop it.[/quote]nj, you’re certainly free to tell the Piggs what you meant by this phrase you posted:

[quote=njtosd]…Emotionally, though, this brings front and center a very distasteful potential crime by a close Clinton connection. And it also reinforces the notion that both Hillary and her closest aid have (a) willful blindness, (b) poor judgment or (c) something else when it comes to what would normally be considered one of the most important relationships in their lives. …[/quote]

Instead of berating me for giving MY opinion, why don’t you give yours? What exactly did to mean by the [bolded] phrase?[/quote]

All right – I understand you’re not so bright, but this shouldn’t be difficult. It is my choice to express what I think and to emphasize one point over another if I choose to. Do not change what I write. I don’t need to explain myself to you upon demand. Speak for yourself – you’ve done a lot of that already.

[njtosd]

[quote=SK in CV][quote=njtosd]
I said potential crime – sexting with a 15 year old and sending lewd images is a problem, which is the reason Weiner’s being investigated. Poor judgement – hmm. Let’s say this – I hope my daughters never even date people like Bill Clinton or Anthony Weiner.[/quote]

So you’re saying that Secretary Clinton is “potentially” guilty of something because of something that Weiner did? She is guilty of poor judgment because someone who is married to her employee did something despicable? Really? Am I guilty of bad judgement because one of my high school buddies, and groomsman at my wedding, was later convicted of a crime and did time in a federal prison? Is my wife, who I married more than 30 year later, also guilty of bad judgement?[/quote]

Go back and read what I wrote. I specifically said a potential crime by a close Clinton connection. Why do you (and BG for that matter) keep trying to change what people say? I guess because doing so strengthens the arguments that you want to make. I don’t know whether you or your wife exhibited bad judgment – that’s for the two of you to figure out.

[FlyerInHi]

BG, I think you represent Trump supporters really well.

[ucodegen]

[quote=SK in CV][quote=mixxalot]Hillary will steal the election and win even though Trump will win the popular vote. The global elites want their puppet to win.[/quote]

Good one.[/quote]
Actually Hillary is the elite’s puppet. She has gone so far as to use white noise generators to hide her meetings with global elites from the press.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-static-noise-speech_us_570930dae4b0836057a16748

A bunch of refs – just Google
https://www.google.com/search?q=clinton+using+white+noise+generators

Trump isn’t. He is too likely to say what is really on his mind – and probably at the wrong time, and maybe not too well thought out. This would be disastrous for the elites. Trump can be noisy, self-promoting, obnoxious – all things that the global elites don’t like because they don’t want attention drawn to them and prefer to operate in the shadows.

[kev374]

As much as I dislike Hillary I can’t imagine the thought of Trump winning, that would be a disaster! If by some horrible sequence of events Trump manages to win I think our other political forces need to figure out how to impeach him as soon as possible so that we can save our nation from further damage. He has done enough damage already!!!

[Anonymous]

[quote=ucodegen]Actually Hillary is the elite’s puppet. She has gone so far as to use white noise generators to hide her meetings with global elites from the press.[/quote]

[quote]Trump isn’t. He is too likely to say what is really on his mind – and probably at the wrong time, and maybe not too well thought out. This would be disastrous for the elites. Trump can be noisy, self-promoting, obnoxious – all things that the global elites don’t like because they don’t want attention drawn to them and prefer to operate in the shadows.[/quote]

He’ll even lift the armrest and move closer – so you can hear him better.

[SK in CV]

[quote=bearishgurl][quote=SK in CV][quote=bearishgurl]SK, you must know that the FBI would not have stated that they were “reopening” (I know you don’t like to call it that but it fits) HRC’s investigation into her e-mail server unless they found some damning evidence on Huma’s laptop or phone. Like it or not, HRC, Huma (and as byproducts) Anthony and Bill are all interconnected. Two of them have been very close for ~20 years and the 4 of them were like One Big Happy Family. Bill actually married Huma and Anthony in 2010.

When one routinely rolls in the mud with their friends and “partners,” they will eventually get someone else’s dirt all over themselves. That’s how it works.[/quote]

The FBI didn’t say they were “reopening”, so no, it doesn’t fit. The FBI doesn’t close cases. They also said they don’t know what is in the emails. So if they don’t know, you can’t possibly even guess that they’re damning. More likely, it’s not the specific content of the emails, in fact, the FBI has acknowledged that all the emails they’re currently referring to (which may be as few as 3) could be emails they’ve already examined.

Weiner is a loser. Bill Clinton is one of the best past presidents the country has ever had. There is no evidence that Huma is anything but an outstanding employee and person. Secretary Clinton’s accomplishments speak for themselves. The dozens of scandals she’s been accused of are nothing more than empty accusations. So, I have no idea what “mud” you’re referring to. Based on your history here, best guess is you’re just making more shit up, so as to not look foolish again. Doesn’t really work very well.[/quote]SK, I’m puzzled at why you are constantly compelled to defend HRC on THIS forum. The bulk of the readers of this forum (90%?) live (and are registered to vote) in CA. Unlike your (adopted) home state of AZ, CA is a “deep blue” state. If every single illegal alien who (accidentally on purpose) was successfully registered to vote at HRC’s 70-80 “tabling events” held throughout the Golden state during the primary season, if wouldn’t matter as to the outcome on November 9. If +/- 2M nonresidents (using their “fake” US addresses at the time of registering to vote) actually made it across the border on 11/8 in a timely manner to pick up their Voter Guides and vote for HRC at their “assigned” SD County polling places, it wouldn’t matter. There are so many of the “liberal elite” residing within the state of CA who would vote against Trump even if Bozo the Clown was running against him on the Democratic ticket. Yes, even if 2M nonresidents successfully crossed the border on 11/8 and were able to successfully vote at their assigned “home polling places” in San Diego County, IT WOULDN’T MATTER as to the outcome of the election! I personally witnessed one event held on a Saturday morning in May of this year by Bill Clinton right here in Chula Vista (their “tabling event” was held IN SPANISH at the student theatre, in the rear of the HS campus). I personally cruised the HUGE student parking lot (as well as the adjacent parking lot of SWC that the rallygoers were using when the rally was already in progress). The verdict was that ~70% of the license plates of vehicles carrying people attending such rally were from …. (drumroll) …. Baja CA Norte. Is anyone surprised??

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/oct/11/critics-predict-new-california-motor-voter-law-wil/

According to the (1/1/06) “CA Motor Voter Law,” illegal aliens can legally use a PO Box for an address on their new CA Driver Licenses (used to identify themselves as “CA residents for voter registration purposes) while US citizen residents must furnish a street address on their Driver License applications. The reasoning behind this decision is that is was “unfair” to require illegal aliens to furnish a bonafide street address to the DMV on their DL applications because many of them live on their employer’s land in employer-owned trailers (agricultural workers) and thus don’t have an actual street address of their own.

SK, you’re preaching to the choir here on Piggington whilst defending HRC at nearly every opportunity when you could be focused on your OWN RED STATE of AZ! Don’t you belong to any AZ blogs? You could be posting HRC’s “virtues” there instead of here and actually be “successful” in getting her more votes! This is sincerely coming from a former longtime DEM activist! I’ll readily admit that the electoral votes in CA will go to HRC and there is nothing ANYONE can do about that in this election cycle. The thousands of staunch “Dem activists” who reside in the nearly 10M-strong SF Bay area have seen to that. Oh, and you should know that they can (and will) travel! Hello, Nevada! There is no one on this board that knows this better than ME. I’m FROM the bay area, for G@d’s sake!

Sure, there are CA counties that have historically voted REP. Namely, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, Colusa, Del Norte, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Inyo, Kern, Kings, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Modoc, Nevada, Orange, Placer, Plumas, Riverside, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Sutter, Tehama, Trinity, Tuolumne and Yuba. HOWEVER, the VAST MAJORITY of the above counties DONT HAVE ENOUGH REGISTERED VOTERS IN THEM to even MATTER in the general election.

So there you have it. Let’s get down to brass tacks here. CA has been for many years and is now a DEEP BLUE STATE. The Trump campaign is NOT GOING TO SPEND A DIME in the Golden State, nor should they. So you don’t have to jump in here at every perceived opportunity and try to defend the undefensible. It is wholly unnecessary, especially at this late date … and the Piggs are smart enough to make up their own minds.

Like Michelle Obama stated on the campaign trail on behalf of her spouse, Barack, in 2007 (and in reference to HRC), “If you can’t run your own house, you certainly can’t run the White House.”

So true.

Doesn’t the AZ Republic have a blog or comments section? If so, are you registered for it? If not, why not? You would do well do get on it TOMORROW MORNING and start posting if you want to make a DIFFERENCE in this election. You’re wasting your time here.[/quote]

BG, I’m not defending Clinton. I’m just pointing out the stupidity of your arguments. I just have one question for you. Why do you consistently make shit up? Wait, two questions. Why do you feel the need to make shit up? Sorry, three questions. Don’t you think you should get some therapy to deal with your constant need to make shit up?

[SK in CV]

[quote=njtosd][quote=SK in CV][quote=njtosd]
I said potential crime – sexting with a 15 year old and sending lewd images is a problem, which is the reason Weiner’s being investigated. Poor judgement – hmm. Let’s say this – I hope my daughters never even date people like Bill Clinton or Anthony Weiner.[/quote]

So you’re saying that Secretary Clinton is “potentially” guilty of something because of something that Weiner did? She is guilty of poor judgment because someone who is married to her employee did something despicable? Really? Am I guilty of bad judgement because one of my high school buddies, and groomsman at my wedding, was later convicted of a crime and did time in a federal prison? Is my wife, who I married more than 30 year later, also guilty of bad judgement?[/quote]

Go back and read what I wrote. I specifically said a potential crime by a close Clinton connection. Why do you (and BG for that matter) keep trying to change what people say? I guess because doing so strengthens the arguments that you want to make. I don’t know whether you or your wife exhibited bad judgment – that’s for the two of you to figure out.[/quote]

And you also said “And it also reinforces the notion that both Hillary and her closest aid have (a) willful blindness, (b) poor judgment …”

I was responding to your including Secretary Clinton. I did not change anything you said. They’re your words.

[SK in CV]

[quote=ucodegen][quote=SK in CV][quote=mixxalot]Hillary will steal the election and win even though Trump will win the popular vote. The global elites want their puppet to win.[/quote]

Good one.[/quote]
Actually Hillary is the elite’s puppet. She has gone so far as to use white noise generators to hide her meetings with global elites from the press.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-static-noise-speech_us_570930dae4b0836057a16748

A bunch of refs – just Google
https://www.google.com/search?q=clinton+using+white+noise+generators

[/quote]

LOL, good one. Global elites? Who exactly is that? Some nefarious group running the world that stays hidden from public view?

More cow bell. Less tin foil.

[scaredyclassic]

anyone watch better call saul.

tin foil gear is critical to the plot

[bearishgurl]

[quote=njtosd][quote=bearishgurl][quote=njtosd]
Once again, BG, you have misquoted me by adding emphasis where there was none. It really riles me – I have explained on a couple of occasions now in painfully clear terms that I resent your misrepresentations. So have other people. Stop it.[/quote]nj, you’re certainly free to tell the Piggs what you meant by this phrase you posted:

[quote=njtosd]…Emotionally, though, this brings front and center a very distasteful potential crime by a close Clinton connection. And it also reinforces the notion that both Hillary and her closest aid have (a) willful blindness, (b) poor judgment or (c) something else when it comes to what would normally be considered one of the most important relationships in their lives. …[/quote]

Instead of berating me for giving MY opinion, why don’t you give yours? What exactly did to mean by the [bolded] phrase?[/quote]

All right – I understand you’re not so bright, but this shouldn’t be difficult. It is my choice to express what I think and to emphasize one point over another if I choose to. Do not change what I write. I don’t need to explain myself to you upon demand. Speak for yourself – you’ve done a lot of that already.[/quote]Good L@rd, I never thought I would actually agree with SK on this issue but those are YOUR words (above). No one has changed anything you have written. How did you expect your words to be interpreted, especially since you are apparently unwilling to clarify them?

Absolutely amazing …. :-0

[bearishgurl]

It appears the MSM has now latched on with the teeth of a pit bull all the (incestuous) Anthony/Huma/Hillary/Bill connections in this sad saga which I previously posted here and which could very well sink the Clinton campaign … in short order. It will be interesting to see if the FBI makes any more public statements in the coming days.

I predict Huma will not come back to the campaign trail …. nor should she. HRC certainly doesn’t need the distraction.

[FlyerInHi]

[quote=ucodegen]

Actually Hillary is the elite’s puppet. She has gone so far as to use white noise generators to hide her meetings with global elites from the press.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-static-noise-speech_us_570930dae4b0836057a16748

A bunch of refs – just Google
https://www.google.com/search?q=clinton+using+white+noise+generators

Trump isn’t. He is too likely to say what is really on his mind – and probably at the wrong time, and maybe not too well thought out. This would be disastrous for the elites. Trump can be noisy, self-promoting, obnoxious – all things that the global elites don’t like because they don’t want attention drawn to them and prefer to operate in the shadows.[/quote]

This is the first time anyone mentioned global elites here.
It’s interesting because around the world people say the people operating in the shadows are us, Americans, via the CIA.

Is George Soros any more global elite than Sheldon Adelson?

[Author]

Posts