Just out of curiosity, did you discuss this plan to create an improved access road with the actual landowner on essentially a previously set of abdicated easements?
Yes with the easements, you have rights, but you’ll essentially taking a once in decade used right of way and planning to turn it into the new primary assess for your property. Do I have that about right? That goes to CA Renter’s question. You’re really taking 3 easements which have little practical use to the people with them and now tying them together to drastically change the impact of the easements on the primary land owner.
I’ll also 2nd CDMA’s point, the horents nest is already kicked. I’m just reading between the lines, and when reading between the lines, you’re looking kinding like you’re doing an f-u, I want this.
How is the proximity from this road you’re planning on building and key areas of their property?
JMHO, you can be 100% legal and still totally schmucky, just like Donald Trump.
I don’t know if for your sake my reading between the lines is total wrong or if I’m right, not 100% sure which will generate more animosity in the long run.
