[quote=HenryPP]
“4S Ranch is one of only five communities in San Diego designed and built according to strict “fire safe” construction standards. These standards resulted in not a single home being lost or even damaged in any of these communities during the October 2007 fires which affected much of Southern California and burned over 2000 homes…”[/quote]
I notice you left off the next sentences from Wikipedia:
“The “Shelter in Place” construction concept of these communities was tested and passed through the fires without any damage. Although adjacent to other popular communities (Poway, Rancho Bernardo, Carmel Valley, Rancho Penasquitos, Rancho Santa Fe) in suburban San Diego, 4S Ranch is the only community among these that has been built to be sufficiently protected from wild fires such that it has been deemed a “Shelter in Place” community”
I don’t know about you, but staying put in a fire is not my idea of a good time. And it misleads the public into thinking that the homes won’t burn.
From other sources:
Shelter in place “doesn’t mean you always stay at home,” Bacon said. “It means you can stay at home because you have done advance preparation. You need to know when to evacuate and when evacuation is too late.”
Opponents fear the strategy will endanger lives by encouraging people to ignore evacuation orders.
That’s precisely why San Diego developer Fred Maas balks at the idea of using shelter-in-place standards to promote newer developments as
totally fire-safe.
“Short of completely sealed concrete houses, it’s very hard to absolutely give people a sense of security (that) you can weather any firestorm,” said Maas, president of Black Mountain Ranch LLC, which is developing the 2,600-home Del Sur project in north San Diego.
“To give people a false sense of security is imprudent, and to represent to them that they’d be safe from a natural disaster is something I’m not
comfortable with,” Maas said.
