[quote=CA renter]No, it would go to other “special interests,” like developers, other agencies, etc.[/quote]
I’m not talking about privitization or hiring developers or other agencies to teach school. You are off on some unrelated tangent.
I’m simply saying that hiring non-union teachers as employees will cost the taxpayers less and still provide jobs to teachers. In fact, it could provide more jobs to teachers because for a fixed budget, lower cost per teacher means they could hire more teachers. So, you either get more teaching jobs or the taxpayers save money.
