Home › Forums › Other › OT-Why Did CIA Director Petraeus Suddenly Resign … And Why Was the U.S. Ambassador to Libya Murdered?
- This topic has 35 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 5 months ago by CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 10, 2012 at 9:42 PM #20267November 11, 2012 at 1:26 AM #754344CA renterParticipant
Gee, the U.S. involved in covert operations dedicated to overturning (often democratically-elected) governments so that we can install our own U.S./U.K.-friendly governments who then allow us/our corporations to exploit their natural resources and control foreign ports and waterways, etc. Say it ain’t so!
November 11, 2012 at 7:26 AM #754345EconProfParticipantI am usually skeptical of conspiracy theories, especially sweeping and detailed accounts like this one. However, it has a ring of credibility to it, especially in how it fills in a lot of blank spaces in our understanding of the Bengazi incident. It appears that now that the election is over, a lot of political and economic coverups will be unmasked–too late, unfortunately.
November 11, 2012 at 9:34 AM #754347NotCrankyParticipantAgain, why can’t they make him testify as the former CIA director? In some format anyway.
Because no one really wants him to talk?November 11, 2012 at 1:53 PM #754370scaredyclassicParticipantis it just me, or is it unreasonable to promote a guy to his rank whose name sounds so much like “betray-us”?
November 11, 2012 at 4:50 PM #754389sjkParticipant[quote=EconProf]I am usually skeptical of conspiracy theories, especially sweeping and detailed accounts like this one. However, it has a ring of credibility to it, especially in how it fills in a lot of blank spaces in our understanding of the Bengazi incident. It appears that now that the election is over, a lot of political and economic coverups will be unmasked–too late, unfortunately.[/quote]
🙂
November 12, 2012 at 12:15 AM #754433JazzmanParticipantI can go along with funneling arms to Syria and wishing to keep quiet about it, not that the Russians wouldn’t find out and tell all. But to sacrifice a high ranking official? I also can’t see a strong connection with the resignation of the CIA chief. If deception is one of the tools of their trade, wouldn’t denying any involvement be fairly routine? And sacrificing yet another highly regarded professional? That’s a big price to pay and a huge gamble IMO that it wouldn’t come out anyway.
More important I believe is the lack of support for the Syrian cause. We are led to believe this is due to the complex mix of elements involved. When has that stopped the US in the past? And if it is the case, then the fact the US is using its enemy (as the above suggests), would be fanning the flames they appear so eager to avoid doing? I think the key here is probably Iran, and a confrontation the US doesn’t want right now.
November 12, 2012 at 7:37 AM #754449ocrenterParticipant[quote=EconProf]I am usually skeptical of conspiracy theories, especially sweeping and detailed accounts like this one. However, it has a ring of credibility to it, especially in how it fills in a lot of blank spaces in our understanding of the Bengazi incident. It appears that now that the election is over, a lot of political and economic coverups will be unmasked–too late, unfortunately.[/quote]
this is a very typical reaction when there are a lot of blank spaces and distrust.
just like the Pakistani general sentiment that Osama is not really dead and the whole thing is a US conspiracy.
November 12, 2012 at 10:54 AM #754473scaredyclassicParticipantNovember 12, 2012 at 12:04 PM #754479NotCrankyParticipantHow on earth did this guy think he would not get caught? I don’t care about people having affairs, but this guy should know he is being watched!
November 12, 2012 at 12:56 PM #754486ZeitgeistParticipant“Curiouser and curiouser!” “During a question-and-answer session, Broadwell was asked about this year’s Sept. 11 attacks against the U.S. mission in Benghazi. She stated: ‘Now I don’t know if a lot of you heard this, but the CIA annex had actually had taken a couple of Libya militia members prisoner. And they think that the attack on the consulate was an effort to try to get these prisoners back. So that’s still being vetted.’”
November 13, 2012 at 10:07 AM #754611no_such_realityParticipantCuriouser and curiouser not so much, more like seedy love quadrangle.
30000 pages of emails? holy bat sh*t.
FBI leaping to investigation on a marginally harrassing email.
Shirtless FBI agentsGood to know the FBI is running on a who you know basis and the military commanders have time for 30,000 pages of personal emails.
November 13, 2012 at 11:26 AM #754617NotCrankyParticipantNow the issues are buried in the circus….again.
November 13, 2012 at 7:45 PM #754643Allan from FallbrookParticipant[quote=Blogstar]Now the issues are buried in the circus….again.[/quote]
Russ: I’m waiting for the revelation that Jill Kelly nee Khawam is actually part of s Hezbollah sleeper cell. Her twin sister, Natalie, was also cozy with diplomats and ranking military officers and they from a family that emigrated to the US from Lebanon during the Lebanese civil war.
This all smells way too fishy to be mere coincidence.
November 13, 2012 at 8:00 PM #754644SK in CVParticipant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook][quote=Blogstar]Now the issues are buried in the circus….again.[/quote]
Russ: I’m waiting for the revelation that Jill Kelly nee Khawam is actually part of s Hezbollah sleeper cell. Her twin sister, Natalie, was also cozy with diplomats and ranking military officers and they from a family that emigrated to the US from Lebanon during the Lebanese civil war.
This all smells way too fishy to be mere coincidence.[/quote]
I’m not sure what you think the coincidence is. The likelihood of Maronite Christians being involved with Hezbollah is a bit unlikely. Kind of like a Jew joining Al Queda.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.