- This topic has 125 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 7 months ago by
CDMA ENG.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 7, 2010 at 7:39 AM #17320April 7, 2010 at 7:54 AM #536618
svelteParticipantThis law does not go near far enough!
Oklahoma and a few other states have recently passed laws stating that the #1 lane (the fast lane) can be used for passing only! No more parking their 60 mph white Camrys in the fast lane and eating lunch!
That is the “move over” law we really need in California…
April 7, 2010 at 7:54 AM #536743svelteParticipantThis law does not go near far enough!
Oklahoma and a few other states have recently passed laws stating that the #1 lane (the fast lane) can be used for passing only! No more parking their 60 mph white Camrys in the fast lane and eating lunch!
That is the “move over” law we really need in California…
April 7, 2010 at 7:54 AM #537199svelteParticipantThis law does not go near far enough!
Oklahoma and a few other states have recently passed laws stating that the #1 lane (the fast lane) can be used for passing only! No more parking their 60 mph white Camrys in the fast lane and eating lunch!
That is the “move over” law we really need in California…
April 7, 2010 at 7:54 AM #537297svelteParticipantThis law does not go near far enough!
Oklahoma and a few other states have recently passed laws stating that the #1 lane (the fast lane) can be used for passing only! No more parking their 60 mph white Camrys in the fast lane and eating lunch!
That is the “move over” law we really need in California…
April 7, 2010 at 7:54 AM #537561svelteParticipantThis law does not go near far enough!
Oklahoma and a few other states have recently passed laws stating that the #1 lane (the fast lane) can be used for passing only! No more parking their 60 mph white Camrys in the fast lane and eating lunch!
That is the “move over” law we really need in California…
April 7, 2010 at 8:18 AM #536633DataAgent
Participant“No more parking their 60 mph white Camrys in the fast lane and eating lunch!”
I was stuck behind one of those bozo’s this morning!
April 7, 2010 at 8:18 AM #536758Participant“No more parking their 60 mph white Camrys in the fast lane and eating lunch!”
I was stuck behind one of those bozo’s this morning!
April 7, 2010 at 8:18 AM #537214Participant“No more parking their 60 mph white Camrys in the fast lane and eating lunch!”
I was stuck behind one of those bozo’s this morning!
April 7, 2010 at 8:18 AM #537312Participant“No more parking their 60 mph white Camrys in the fast lane and eating lunch!”
I was stuck behind one of those bozo’s this morning!
April 7, 2010 at 8:18 AM #537576Participant“No more parking their 60 mph white Camrys in the fast lane and eating lunch!”
I was stuck behind one of those bozo’s this morning!
April 7, 2010 at 8:32 AM #536638pencilneck
Participanthttp://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_0151-0200/sb_159_bill_20090806_chaptered.html
(1) Make a lane change into an available lane not immediately adjacent to the authorized emergency vehicle or tow truck with due regard for safety and traffic conditions, if practicable and not prohibited by law.
(2) If the maneuver described in paragraph (1) would be unsafe or impracticable, slow to a reasonable and prudent speed that is safe for existing weather, road, and vehicular or pedestrian traffic conditions.I knew of the law, but just read the second paragraph. Seems a little vague, no?
April 7, 2010 at 8:32 AM #536763Participanthttp://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_0151-0200/sb_159_bill_20090806_chaptered.html
(1) Make a lane change into an available lane not immediately adjacent to the authorized emergency vehicle or tow truck with due regard for safety and traffic conditions, if practicable and not prohibited by law.
(2) If the maneuver described in paragraph (1) would be unsafe or impracticable, slow to a reasonable and prudent speed that is safe for existing weather, road, and vehicular or pedestrian traffic conditions.I knew of the law, but just read the second paragraph. Seems a little vague, no?
April 7, 2010 at 8:32 AM #537219Participanthttp://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_0151-0200/sb_159_bill_20090806_chaptered.html
(1) Make a lane change into an available lane not immediately adjacent to the authorized emergency vehicle or tow truck with due regard for safety and traffic conditions, if practicable and not prohibited by law.
(2) If the maneuver described in paragraph (1) would be unsafe or impracticable, slow to a reasonable and prudent speed that is safe for existing weather, road, and vehicular or pedestrian traffic conditions.I knew of the law, but just read the second paragraph. Seems a little vague, no?
April 7, 2010 at 8:32 AM #537317Participanthttp://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_0151-0200/sb_159_bill_20090806_chaptered.html
(1) Make a lane change into an available lane not immediately adjacent to the authorized emergency vehicle or tow truck with due regard for safety and traffic conditions, if practicable and not prohibited by law.
(2) If the maneuver described in paragraph (1) would be unsafe or impracticable, slow to a reasonable and prudent speed that is safe for existing weather, road, and vehicular or pedestrian traffic conditions.I knew of the law, but just read the second paragraph. Seems a little vague, no?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.