Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Michael Moore’s ‘Capitalism: A Love Story’
- This topic has 55 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 15, 2009 at 10:54 PM #16346September 15, 2009 at 11:56 PM #457164urbanrealtorParticipant
While I find his stuff entertaining (I am a liberal and he is funny) I think that the NY Times referred to him as a bumper sticker masquerading as political ideology (or something similar).
Thats about right.
He raises a few good points and questions and then keeps going on for like 2 hours.He is no John Stewart.
Stewart engages his opponents.
Moore just kind of screams in an echo chamber or chants against his opponents.
Not my favorite pundit or activist.September 15, 2009 at 11:56 PM #457360urbanrealtorParticipantWhile I find his stuff entertaining (I am a liberal and he is funny) I think that the NY Times referred to him as a bumper sticker masquerading as political ideology (or something similar).
Thats about right.
He raises a few good points and questions and then keeps going on for like 2 hours.He is no John Stewart.
Stewart engages his opponents.
Moore just kind of screams in an echo chamber or chants against his opponents.
Not my favorite pundit or activist.September 15, 2009 at 11:56 PM #457964urbanrealtorParticipantWhile I find his stuff entertaining (I am a liberal and he is funny) I think that the NY Times referred to him as a bumper sticker masquerading as political ideology (or something similar).
Thats about right.
He raises a few good points and questions and then keeps going on for like 2 hours.He is no John Stewart.
Stewart engages his opponents.
Moore just kind of screams in an echo chamber or chants against his opponents.
Not my favorite pundit or activist.September 15, 2009 at 11:56 PM #457773urbanrealtorParticipantWhile I find his stuff entertaining (I am a liberal and he is funny) I think that the NY Times referred to him as a bumper sticker masquerading as political ideology (or something similar).
Thats about right.
He raises a few good points and questions and then keeps going on for like 2 hours.He is no John Stewart.
Stewart engages his opponents.
Moore just kind of screams in an echo chamber or chants against his opponents.
Not my favorite pundit or activist.September 15, 2009 at 11:56 PM #457700urbanrealtorParticipantWhile I find his stuff entertaining (I am a liberal and he is funny) I think that the NY Times referred to him as a bumper sticker masquerading as political ideology (or something similar).
Thats about right.
He raises a few good points and questions and then keeps going on for like 2 hours.He is no John Stewart.
Stewart engages his opponents.
Moore just kind of screams in an echo chamber or chants against his opponents.
Not my favorite pundit or activist.September 16, 2009 at 7:33 AM #457214evolusdParticipantHaven’t seen it, but will probably rent it. Despite being a gun owner and proponent of the 2nd amendment, I really enjoyed his documentary Bowling for Columbine.
September 16, 2009 at 7:33 AM #457409evolusdParticipantHaven’t seen it, but will probably rent it. Despite being a gun owner and proponent of the 2nd amendment, I really enjoyed his documentary Bowling for Columbine.
September 16, 2009 at 7:33 AM #458014evolusdParticipantHaven’t seen it, but will probably rent it. Despite being a gun owner and proponent of the 2nd amendment, I really enjoyed his documentary Bowling for Columbine.
September 16, 2009 at 7:33 AM #457823evolusdParticipantHaven’t seen it, but will probably rent it. Despite being a gun owner and proponent of the 2nd amendment, I really enjoyed his documentary Bowling for Columbine.
September 16, 2009 at 7:33 AM #457750evolusdParticipantHaven’t seen it, but will probably rent it. Despite being a gun owner and proponent of the 2nd amendment, I really enjoyed his documentary Bowling for Columbine.
September 16, 2009 at 11:30 AM #457932yooklidParticipantI think what people ignored was that he said Gun ownership was NOT the problem. They just see it as an anti gun movie and don’t watch it.
September 16, 2009 at 11:30 AM #458119yooklidParticipantI think what people ignored was that he said Gun ownership was NOT the problem. They just see it as an anti gun movie and don’t watch it.
September 16, 2009 at 11:30 AM #457859yooklidParticipantI think what people ignored was that he said Gun ownership was NOT the problem. They just see it as an anti gun movie and don’t watch it.
September 16, 2009 at 11:30 AM #457324yooklidParticipantI think what people ignored was that he said Gun ownership was NOT the problem. They just see it as an anti gun movie and don’t watch it.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.