- This topic has 70 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by Nor-LA-SD-guy.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 12, 2009 at 5:59 AM #16176August 12, 2009 at 9:33 AM #443857UCGalParticipant
It’s not the renters fault in the second house. They are (presumeably) paying the rent and the owner is the one not paying the bills.
In both cases the residents of the homes have permission to be in the homes.
Should the bank forclose on both properties. Probably. Is it the renters fault, especially if they’ve been paying their rent. No.
Be angry at the owners and the banks. Don’t accuse renters of being squatters.
August 12, 2009 at 9:33 AM #444458UCGalParticipantIt’s not the renters fault in the second house. They are (presumeably) paying the rent and the owner is the one not paying the bills.
In both cases the residents of the homes have permission to be in the homes.
Should the bank forclose on both properties. Probably. Is it the renters fault, especially if they’ve been paying their rent. No.
Be angry at the owners and the banks. Don’t accuse renters of being squatters.
August 12, 2009 at 9:33 AM #444389UCGalParticipantIt’s not the renters fault in the second house. They are (presumeably) paying the rent and the owner is the one not paying the bills.
In both cases the residents of the homes have permission to be in the homes.
Should the bank forclose on both properties. Probably. Is it the renters fault, especially if they’ve been paying their rent. No.
Be angry at the owners and the banks. Don’t accuse renters of being squatters.
August 12, 2009 at 9:33 AM #444637UCGalParticipantIt’s not the renters fault in the second house. They are (presumeably) paying the rent and the owner is the one not paying the bills.
In both cases the residents of the homes have permission to be in the homes.
Should the bank forclose on both properties. Probably. Is it the renters fault, especially if they’ve been paying their rent. No.
Be angry at the owners and the banks. Don’t accuse renters of being squatters.
August 12, 2009 at 9:33 AM #444052UCGalParticipantIt’s not the renters fault in the second house. They are (presumeably) paying the rent and the owner is the one not paying the bills.
In both cases the residents of the homes have permission to be in the homes.
Should the bank forclose on both properties. Probably. Is it the renters fault, especially if they’ve been paying their rent. No.
Be angry at the owners and the banks. Don’t accuse renters of being squatters.
August 12, 2009 at 9:35 AM #444057ArrayaParticipantWith the current economic climate and the amount of empty housing, squatting will be an increasing trend.
August 12, 2009 at 9:35 AM #444642ArrayaParticipantWith the current economic climate and the amount of empty housing, squatting will be an increasing trend.
August 12, 2009 at 9:35 AM #443862ArrayaParticipantWith the current economic climate and the amount of empty housing, squatting will be an increasing trend.
August 12, 2009 at 9:35 AM #444394ArrayaParticipantWith the current economic climate and the amount of empty housing, squatting will be an increasing trend.
August 12, 2009 at 9:35 AM #444463ArrayaParticipantWith the current economic climate and the amount of empty housing, squatting will be an increasing trend.
August 12, 2009 at 12:30 PM #444132AKParticipantGiven lenders’ obvious preference for all-cash offers … those houses may get sold, but they may not get owner occupied.
August 12, 2009 at 12:30 PM #444716AKParticipantGiven lenders’ obvious preference for all-cash offers … those houses may get sold, but they may not get owner occupied.
August 12, 2009 at 12:30 PM #443938AKParticipantGiven lenders’ obvious preference for all-cash offers … those houses may get sold, but they may not get owner occupied.
August 12, 2009 at 12:30 PM #444538AKParticipantGiven lenders’ obvious preference for all-cash offers … those houses may get sold, but they may not get owner occupied.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.