Home › Forums › Housing › My girlfriend wants to buy a condo in north county. But what do the Piggs say?
- This topic has 70 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by
CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 8, 2009 at 10:38 PM #15254March 8, 2009 at 11:03 PM #362556
blahblahblah
ParticipantIf she wants to buy a place she shouldn’t spend more than 3X her annual income, 4X at the outside. So the max she should pay for her condo is $90-120K.
March 8, 2009 at 11:03 PM #362850blahblahblah
ParticipantIf she wants to buy a place she shouldn’t spend more than 3X her annual income, 4X at the outside. So the max she should pay for her condo is $90-120K.
March 8, 2009 at 11:03 PM #363000blahblahblah
ParticipantIf she wants to buy a place she shouldn’t spend more than 3X her annual income, 4X at the outside. So the max she should pay for her condo is $90-120K.
March 8, 2009 at 11:03 PM #363041blahblahblah
ParticipantIf she wants to buy a place she shouldn’t spend more than 3X her annual income, 4X at the outside. So the max she should pay for her condo is $90-120K.
March 8, 2009 at 11:03 PM #363150blahblahblah
ParticipantIf she wants to buy a place she shouldn’t spend more than 3X her annual income, 4X at the outside. So the max she should pay for her condo is $90-120K.
March 9, 2009 at 12:10 AM #362576TheBreeze
ParticipantI didn’t quite understand your post. The company she works for pays her $1600/month rent? If she bought, would she herself be making the monthly payments or would the company do it?
Why does she want to buy if her rent is paid for? This makes absolutely no sense. She would be giving up a $1600/month benefit in exchange for an approximately $1800-2000 month liability. That’s a $3,400 swing. How could anyone think this is a good idea?
Personally, I think it’s outrageous that someone in your girlfriend’s position could get a loan for $250K. After taxes, the monthly payment would consume almost all of her monthly nut. Unfortunately, FHA will probably welcome your girlfriend with open arms only to see her foreclosed upon in less than a year.
Plus, it’s almost guaranteed that the place your girlfriend ends up buying will be worse than her current condo. I can think of no reason why she should buy.
March 9, 2009 at 12:10 AM #362870TheBreeze
ParticipantI didn’t quite understand your post. The company she works for pays her $1600/month rent? If she bought, would she herself be making the monthly payments or would the company do it?
Why does she want to buy if her rent is paid for? This makes absolutely no sense. She would be giving up a $1600/month benefit in exchange for an approximately $1800-2000 month liability. That’s a $3,400 swing. How could anyone think this is a good idea?
Personally, I think it’s outrageous that someone in your girlfriend’s position could get a loan for $250K. After taxes, the monthly payment would consume almost all of her monthly nut. Unfortunately, FHA will probably welcome your girlfriend with open arms only to see her foreclosed upon in less than a year.
Plus, it’s almost guaranteed that the place your girlfriend ends up buying will be worse than her current condo. I can think of no reason why she should buy.
March 9, 2009 at 12:10 AM #363020TheBreeze
ParticipantI didn’t quite understand your post. The company she works for pays her $1600/month rent? If she bought, would she herself be making the monthly payments or would the company do it?
Why does she want to buy if her rent is paid for? This makes absolutely no sense. She would be giving up a $1600/month benefit in exchange for an approximately $1800-2000 month liability. That’s a $3,400 swing. How could anyone think this is a good idea?
Personally, I think it’s outrageous that someone in your girlfriend’s position could get a loan for $250K. After taxes, the monthly payment would consume almost all of her monthly nut. Unfortunately, FHA will probably welcome your girlfriend with open arms only to see her foreclosed upon in less than a year.
Plus, it’s almost guaranteed that the place your girlfriend ends up buying will be worse than her current condo. I can think of no reason why she should buy.
March 9, 2009 at 12:10 AM #363061TheBreeze
ParticipantI didn’t quite understand your post. The company she works for pays her $1600/month rent? If she bought, would she herself be making the monthly payments or would the company do it?
Why does she want to buy if her rent is paid for? This makes absolutely no sense. She would be giving up a $1600/month benefit in exchange for an approximately $1800-2000 month liability. That’s a $3,400 swing. How could anyone think this is a good idea?
Personally, I think it’s outrageous that someone in your girlfriend’s position could get a loan for $250K. After taxes, the monthly payment would consume almost all of her monthly nut. Unfortunately, FHA will probably welcome your girlfriend with open arms only to see her foreclosed upon in less than a year.
Plus, it’s almost guaranteed that the place your girlfriend ends up buying will be worse than her current condo. I can think of no reason why she should buy.
March 9, 2009 at 12:10 AM #363170TheBreeze
ParticipantI didn’t quite understand your post. The company she works for pays her $1600/month rent? If she bought, would she herself be making the monthly payments or would the company do it?
Why does she want to buy if her rent is paid for? This makes absolutely no sense. She would be giving up a $1600/month benefit in exchange for an approximately $1800-2000 month liability. That’s a $3,400 swing. How could anyone think this is a good idea?
Personally, I think it’s outrageous that someone in your girlfriend’s position could get a loan for $250K. After taxes, the monthly payment would consume almost all of her monthly nut. Unfortunately, FHA will probably welcome your girlfriend with open arms only to see her foreclosed upon in less than a year.
Plus, it’s almost guaranteed that the place your girlfriend ends up buying will be worse than her current condo. I can think of no reason why she should buy.
March 9, 2009 at 1:02 AM #362586surveyor
Participanthaha
Uh oh, she’s nesting! Better run!
Kidding!
March 9, 2009 at 1:02 AM #362880surveyor
Participanthaha
Uh oh, she’s nesting! Better run!
Kidding!
March 9, 2009 at 1:02 AM #363030surveyor
Participanthaha
Uh oh, she’s nesting! Better run!
Kidding!
March 9, 2009 at 1:02 AM #363071surveyor
Participanthaha
Uh oh, she’s nesting! Better run!
Kidding!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
