- This topic has 605 replies, 30 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 6 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 28, 2009 at 12:42 AM #14927January 28, 2009 at 8:00 AM #337512alarmclockParticipant
Ayn Rand and objectivism are something like a crazy loner uncle (or aunt, I guess). The ideas are frankly very interesting, but it’s almost impossible to get past her complete inability to write about interpersonal relationships. Neglecting the many stupid things I’ve written here, I “won” the brain raffle, as did everyone who places into the top quartile (probably everyone on this site, who uses a computer, etc). The key thing to understand is that I did not do a single thing to earn this brain; granted, I have honed my skills over the years, but I didn’t do anything to earn my brain, just as Shaq/%%WELL_KNOWN_ATHLETE%% didn’t do anything to earn his height, or his fast twitch to slow twitch muscle ratio [although he has obviously honed his physical skills].
In my personal “tribal” view of humanity, if you receive a windfall that you did nothing to earn, you are obligated to share it with your tribe. Period. That’s the rules of the game, for me. For this reason, I can’t really support Ayn Rand’s ideas.
January 28, 2009 at 8:00 AM #337843alarmclockParticipantAyn Rand and objectivism are something like a crazy loner uncle (or aunt, I guess). The ideas are frankly very interesting, but it’s almost impossible to get past her complete inability to write about interpersonal relationships. Neglecting the many stupid things I’ve written here, I “won” the brain raffle, as did everyone who places into the top quartile (probably everyone on this site, who uses a computer, etc). The key thing to understand is that I did not do a single thing to earn this brain; granted, I have honed my skills over the years, but I didn’t do anything to earn my brain, just as Shaq/%%WELL_KNOWN_ATHLETE%% didn’t do anything to earn his height, or his fast twitch to slow twitch muscle ratio [although he has obviously honed his physical skills].
In my personal “tribal” view of humanity, if you receive a windfall that you did nothing to earn, you are obligated to share it with your tribe. Period. That’s the rules of the game, for me. For this reason, I can’t really support Ayn Rand’s ideas.
January 28, 2009 at 8:00 AM #337934alarmclockParticipantAyn Rand and objectivism are something like a crazy loner uncle (or aunt, I guess). The ideas are frankly very interesting, but it’s almost impossible to get past her complete inability to write about interpersonal relationships. Neglecting the many stupid things I’ve written here, I “won” the brain raffle, as did everyone who places into the top quartile (probably everyone on this site, who uses a computer, etc). The key thing to understand is that I did not do a single thing to earn this brain; granted, I have honed my skills over the years, but I didn’t do anything to earn my brain, just as Shaq/%%WELL_KNOWN_ATHLETE%% didn’t do anything to earn his height, or his fast twitch to slow twitch muscle ratio [although he has obviously honed his physical skills].
In my personal “tribal” view of humanity, if you receive a windfall that you did nothing to earn, you are obligated to share it with your tribe. Period. That’s the rules of the game, for me. For this reason, I can’t really support Ayn Rand’s ideas.
January 28, 2009 at 8:00 AM #337960alarmclockParticipantAyn Rand and objectivism are something like a crazy loner uncle (or aunt, I guess). The ideas are frankly very interesting, but it’s almost impossible to get past her complete inability to write about interpersonal relationships. Neglecting the many stupid things I’ve written here, I “won” the brain raffle, as did everyone who places into the top quartile (probably everyone on this site, who uses a computer, etc). The key thing to understand is that I did not do a single thing to earn this brain; granted, I have honed my skills over the years, but I didn’t do anything to earn my brain, just as Shaq/%%WELL_KNOWN_ATHLETE%% didn’t do anything to earn his height, or his fast twitch to slow twitch muscle ratio [although he has obviously honed his physical skills].
In my personal “tribal” view of humanity, if you receive a windfall that you did nothing to earn, you are obligated to share it with your tribe. Period. That’s the rules of the game, for me. For this reason, I can’t really support Ayn Rand’s ideas.
January 28, 2009 at 8:00 AM #338053alarmclockParticipantAyn Rand and objectivism are something like a crazy loner uncle (or aunt, I guess). The ideas are frankly very interesting, but it’s almost impossible to get past her complete inability to write about interpersonal relationships. Neglecting the many stupid things I’ve written here, I “won” the brain raffle, as did everyone who places into the top quartile (probably everyone on this site, who uses a computer, etc). The key thing to understand is that I did not do a single thing to earn this brain; granted, I have honed my skills over the years, but I didn’t do anything to earn my brain, just as Shaq/%%WELL_KNOWN_ATHLETE%% didn’t do anything to earn his height, or his fast twitch to slow twitch muscle ratio [although he has obviously honed his physical skills].
In my personal “tribal” view of humanity, if you receive a windfall that you did nothing to earn, you are obligated to share it with your tribe. Period. That’s the rules of the game, for me. For this reason, I can’t really support Ayn Rand’s ideas.
January 28, 2009 at 9:07 AM #337552sdduuuudeParticipantThe recession proves that systems which are called “free market economies,” but really aren’t free-market economies really don’t work.
January 28, 2009 at 9:07 AM #337883sdduuuudeParticipantThe recession proves that systems which are called “free market economies,” but really aren’t free-market economies really don’t work.
January 28, 2009 at 9:07 AM #337974sdduuuudeParticipantThe recession proves that systems which are called “free market economies,” but really aren’t free-market economies really don’t work.
January 28, 2009 at 9:07 AM #338000sdduuuudeParticipantThe recession proves that systems which are called “free market economies,” but really aren’t free-market economies really don’t work.
January 28, 2009 at 9:07 AM #338093sdduuuudeParticipantThe recession proves that systems which are called “free market economies,” but really aren’t free-market economies really don’t work.
January 28, 2009 at 9:14 AM #337587AnonymousGuestI don’t think its fair to compare today’s economy with a true capitalist/laissez faire economy/society. Having said that, I don’t think Mr Galt would be leading the captains of industry if he knew what greedy scoundrels they turned out to be. To have free market society you have to have integrity.
An engineer by trade, Galt’s actions include withdrawing his talents, “stopping the motor of the world,” and leading the “strikers” (in this case the captains of industry) against the “looters” (in this case the mob rule of strikers and the common man). The
January 28, 2009 at 9:14 AM #337918AnonymousGuestI don’t think its fair to compare today’s economy with a true capitalist/laissez faire economy/society. Having said that, I don’t think Mr Galt would be leading the captains of industry if he knew what greedy scoundrels they turned out to be. To have free market society you have to have integrity.
An engineer by trade, Galt’s actions include withdrawing his talents, “stopping the motor of the world,” and leading the “strikers” (in this case the captains of industry) against the “looters” (in this case the mob rule of strikers and the common man). The
January 28, 2009 at 9:14 AM #338009AnonymousGuestI don’t think its fair to compare today’s economy with a true capitalist/laissez faire economy/society. Having said that, I don’t think Mr Galt would be leading the captains of industry if he knew what greedy scoundrels they turned out to be. To have free market society you have to have integrity.
An engineer by trade, Galt’s actions include withdrawing his talents, “stopping the motor of the world,” and leading the “strikers” (in this case the captains of industry) against the “looters” (in this case the mob rule of strikers and the common man). The
January 28, 2009 at 9:14 AM #338035AnonymousGuestI don’t think its fair to compare today’s economy with a true capitalist/laissez faire economy/society. Having said that, I don’t think Mr Galt would be leading the captains of industry if he knew what greedy scoundrels they turned out to be. To have free market society you have to have integrity.
An engineer by trade, Galt’s actions include withdrawing his talents, “stopping the motor of the world,” and leading the “strikers” (in this case the captains of industry) against the “looters” (in this case the mob rule of strikers and the common man). The
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.