- This topic has 70 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 16 years ago by AK.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 16, 2008 at 11:48 PM #14640December 17, 2008 at 10:03 AM #316821peterbParticipant
These are all worth reading if for no other reason than you can get alternative points of view. Then decide for yourself which are more logical. I’ve followed Mish for a while and the guy not only thinks outside the box, but his logic and data are excellent. Mr Mortgage can be a bit one-sided, but he give data and insight that’s really hard to get anywhere else!! Jim Rogers is way over rated, IMO.
Naked is interesting. Have you checked out Jesse? He’s got some thinking that’s not mainstream and he’s not tin foily.December 17, 2008 at 10:03 AM #317309peterbParticipantThese are all worth reading if for no other reason than you can get alternative points of view. Then decide for yourself which are more logical. I’ve followed Mish for a while and the guy not only thinks outside the box, but his logic and data are excellent. Mr Mortgage can be a bit one-sided, but he give data and insight that’s really hard to get anywhere else!! Jim Rogers is way over rated, IMO.
Naked is interesting. Have you checked out Jesse? He’s got some thinking that’s not mainstream and he’s not tin foily.December 17, 2008 at 10:03 AM #317236peterbParticipantThese are all worth reading if for no other reason than you can get alternative points of view. Then decide for yourself which are more logical. I’ve followed Mish for a while and the guy not only thinks outside the box, but his logic and data are excellent. Mr Mortgage can be a bit one-sided, but he give data and insight that’s really hard to get anywhere else!! Jim Rogers is way over rated, IMO.
Naked is interesting. Have you checked out Jesse? He’s got some thinking that’s not mainstream and he’s not tin foily.December 17, 2008 at 10:03 AM #317213peterbParticipantThese are all worth reading if for no other reason than you can get alternative points of view. Then decide for yourself which are more logical. I’ve followed Mish for a while and the guy not only thinks outside the box, but his logic and data are excellent. Mr Mortgage can be a bit one-sided, but he give data and insight that’s really hard to get anywhere else!! Jim Rogers is way over rated, IMO.
Naked is interesting. Have you checked out Jesse? He’s got some thinking that’s not mainstream and he’s not tin foily.December 17, 2008 at 10:03 AM #317171peterbParticipantThese are all worth reading if for no other reason than you can get alternative points of view. Then decide for yourself which are more logical. I’ve followed Mish for a while and the guy not only thinks outside the box, but his logic and data are excellent. Mr Mortgage can be a bit one-sided, but he give data and insight that’s really hard to get anywhere else!! Jim Rogers is way over rated, IMO.
Naked is interesting. Have you checked out Jesse? He’s got some thinking that’s not mainstream and he’s not tin foily.December 17, 2008 at 10:21 AM #317256sdrealtorParticipantAlternative points of view? C’mon those are all the same points of view. If you want alternative points of view you need to listen to the bulls also no matter how wrong they are they will help you achieve a balanced perspective.
December 17, 2008 at 10:21 AM #317330sdrealtorParticipantAlternative points of view? C’mon those are all the same points of view. If you want alternative points of view you need to listen to the bulls also no matter how wrong they are they will help you achieve a balanced perspective.
December 17, 2008 at 10:21 AM #317234sdrealtorParticipantAlternative points of view? C’mon those are all the same points of view. If you want alternative points of view you need to listen to the bulls also no matter how wrong they are they will help you achieve a balanced perspective.
December 17, 2008 at 10:21 AM #317192sdrealtorParticipantAlternative points of view? C’mon those are all the same points of view. If you want alternative points of view you need to listen to the bulls also no matter how wrong they are they will help you achieve a balanced perspective.
December 17, 2008 at 10:21 AM #316841sdrealtorParticipantAlternative points of view? C’mon those are all the same points of view. If you want alternative points of view you need to listen to the bulls also no matter how wrong they are they will help you achieve a balanced perspective.
December 17, 2008 at 10:40 AM #317359peterbParticipantMSM is pervasive and takes virtually zero effort to pay attention to them since one is bombarded with their viewpoints on a daily basis. That’s why it’s called “main stream media”. They are always way late with a call on investments and talk the book of their sponsors. Hardly what I would call “alternative”. I would define “alternative” as that which is not commonly available.
MSM offers the same story which ever one you would chose to listen to. Rogers differs with Mish on many investments. If you had done your homework you’d know how there’s often many disagreements between these blogs. But that would take some effort and thought.
December 17, 2008 at 10:40 AM #317222peterbParticipantMSM is pervasive and takes virtually zero effort to pay attention to them since one is bombarded with their viewpoints on a daily basis. That’s why it’s called “main stream media”. They are always way late with a call on investments and talk the book of their sponsors. Hardly what I would call “alternative”. I would define “alternative” as that which is not commonly available.
MSM offers the same story which ever one you would chose to listen to. Rogers differs with Mish on many investments. If you had done your homework you’d know how there’s often many disagreements between these blogs. But that would take some effort and thought.
December 17, 2008 at 10:40 AM #317265peterbParticipantMSM is pervasive and takes virtually zero effort to pay attention to them since one is bombarded with their viewpoints on a daily basis. That’s why it’s called “main stream media”. They are always way late with a call on investments and talk the book of their sponsors. Hardly what I would call “alternative”. I would define “alternative” as that which is not commonly available.
MSM offers the same story which ever one you would chose to listen to. Rogers differs with Mish on many investments. If you had done your homework you’d know how there’s often many disagreements between these blogs. But that would take some effort and thought.
December 17, 2008 at 10:40 AM #316871peterbParticipantMSM is pervasive and takes virtually zero effort to pay attention to them since one is bombarded with their viewpoints on a daily basis. That’s why it’s called “main stream media”. They are always way late with a call on investments and talk the book of their sponsors. Hardly what I would call “alternative”. I would define “alternative” as that which is not commonly available.
MSM offers the same story which ever one you would chose to listen to. Rogers differs with Mish on many investments. If you had done your homework you’d know how there’s often many disagreements between these blogs. But that would take some effort and thought.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.