- This topic has 240 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 10 months ago by afx114.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 25, 2008 at 7:15 PM #13964September 25, 2008 at 7:22 PM #275421EugeneParticipant
From blog comments:
“Eight years of Bush have not been kind to science. And given the challenges we are facing (e.g., how to sustain well over 6 billion people without destroying our planet), this is not the time to short-change the scientific enterprise. Sadly, there is much evidence that McCain will carry on the Republican trend. Picking a running-mate that believes the Earth is 3000 years old, and that humans have nothing to do with global warming, does not inspire confidence.”
September 25, 2008 at 7:22 PM #275673EugeneParticipantFrom blog comments:
“Eight years of Bush have not been kind to science. And given the challenges we are facing (e.g., how to sustain well over 6 billion people without destroying our planet), this is not the time to short-change the scientific enterprise. Sadly, there is much evidence that McCain will carry on the Republican trend. Picking a running-mate that believes the Earth is 3000 years old, and that humans have nothing to do with global warming, does not inspire confidence.”
September 25, 2008 at 7:22 PM #275675EugeneParticipantFrom blog comments:
“Eight years of Bush have not been kind to science. And given the challenges we are facing (e.g., how to sustain well over 6 billion people without destroying our planet), this is not the time to short-change the scientific enterprise. Sadly, there is much evidence that McCain will carry on the Republican trend. Picking a running-mate that believes the Earth is 3000 years old, and that humans have nothing to do with global warming, does not inspire confidence.”
September 25, 2008 at 7:22 PM #275724EugeneParticipantFrom blog comments:
“Eight years of Bush have not been kind to science. And given the challenges we are facing (e.g., how to sustain well over 6 billion people without destroying our planet), this is not the time to short-change the scientific enterprise. Sadly, there is much evidence that McCain will carry on the Republican trend. Picking a running-mate that believes the Earth is 3000 years old, and that humans have nothing to do with global warming, does not inspire confidence.”
September 25, 2008 at 7:22 PM #275742EugeneParticipantFrom blog comments:
“Eight years of Bush have not been kind to science. And given the challenges we are facing (e.g., how to sustain well over 6 billion people without destroying our planet), this is not the time to short-change the scientific enterprise. Sadly, there is much evidence that McCain will carry on the Republican trend. Picking a running-mate that believes the Earth is 3000 years old, and that humans have nothing to do with global warming, does not inspire confidence.”
September 25, 2008 at 9:45 PM #275521nostradamusParticipantCheck these out. If it wasn’t so scary to live in a country that might elect her, it would be funny.
On Foreign Policy
On the Bush Doctrine
September 25, 2008 at 9:45 PM #275773nostradamusParticipantCheck these out. If it wasn’t so scary to live in a country that might elect her, it would be funny.
On Foreign Policy
On the Bush Doctrine
September 25, 2008 at 9:45 PM #275775nostradamusParticipantCheck these out. If it wasn’t so scary to live in a country that might elect her, it would be funny.
On Foreign Policy
On the Bush Doctrine
September 25, 2008 at 9:45 PM #275824nostradamusParticipantCheck these out. If it wasn’t so scary to live in a country that might elect her, it would be funny.
On Foreign Policy
On the Bush Doctrine
September 25, 2008 at 9:45 PM #275840nostradamusParticipantCheck these out. If it wasn’t so scary to live in a country that might elect her, it would be funny.
On Foreign Policy
On the Bush Doctrine
September 25, 2008 at 9:45 PM #275526patientlywaitingParticipantI liked the Year 2000 McCain much better.
I’ll be voting for Obama since of the two, he’s clearly the superior choice.
September 25, 2008 at 9:45 PM #275778patientlywaitingParticipantI liked the Year 2000 McCain much better.
I’ll be voting for Obama since of the two, he’s clearly the superior choice.
September 25, 2008 at 9:45 PM #275780patientlywaitingParticipantI liked the Year 2000 McCain much better.
I’ll be voting for Obama since of the two, he’s clearly the superior choice.
September 25, 2008 at 9:45 PM #275829patientlywaitingParticipantI liked the Year 2000 McCain much better.
I’ll be voting for Obama since of the two, he’s clearly the superior choice.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.