- This topic has 130 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 4 months ago by
Jim Jones.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 3, 2008 at 4:57 AM #13502August 3, 2008 at 8:41 AM #251123
bsrsharma
ParticipantLeaving CA
This has been quite hot since at least 2004. But why MT & WY; what do they want to do there, other than just retiring? In terms of economic liveliness, South and Southeast seem to have some vitality. Also, with increasing energy costs, cold places are expensive to live.
August 3, 2008 at 8:41 AM #251282bsrsharma
ParticipantLeaving CA
This has been quite hot since at least 2004. But why MT & WY; what do they want to do there, other than just retiring? In terms of economic liveliness, South and Southeast seem to have some vitality. Also, with increasing energy costs, cold places are expensive to live.
August 3, 2008 at 8:41 AM #251290bsrsharma
ParticipantLeaving CA
This has been quite hot since at least 2004. But why MT & WY; what do they want to do there, other than just retiring? In terms of economic liveliness, South and Southeast seem to have some vitality. Also, with increasing energy costs, cold places are expensive to live.
August 3, 2008 at 8:41 AM #251346bsrsharma
ParticipantLeaving CA
This has been quite hot since at least 2004. But why MT & WY; what do they want to do there, other than just retiring? In terms of economic liveliness, South and Southeast seem to have some vitality. Also, with increasing energy costs, cold places are expensive to live.
August 3, 2008 at 8:41 AM #251354bsrsharma
ParticipantLeaving CA
This has been quite hot since at least 2004. But why MT & WY; what do they want to do there, other than just retiring? In terms of economic liveliness, South and Southeast seem to have some vitality. Also, with increasing energy costs, cold places are expensive to live.
August 3, 2008 at 8:57 AM #251133EconProf
ParticipantMT & WY have: lower taxes, cheaper housing, better schools, less congestion, way lower unemployment rates, clean and honest governments, nature in abundance.
CA has: better weather.August 3, 2008 at 8:57 AM #251292EconProf
ParticipantMT & WY have: lower taxes, cheaper housing, better schools, less congestion, way lower unemployment rates, clean and honest governments, nature in abundance.
CA has: better weather.August 3, 2008 at 8:57 AM #251300EconProf
ParticipantMT & WY have: lower taxes, cheaper housing, better schools, less congestion, way lower unemployment rates, clean and honest governments, nature in abundance.
CA has: better weather.August 3, 2008 at 8:57 AM #251356EconProf
ParticipantMT & WY have: lower taxes, cheaper housing, better schools, less congestion, way lower unemployment rates, clean and honest governments, nature in abundance.
CA has: better weather.August 3, 2008 at 8:57 AM #251364EconProf
ParticipantMT & WY have: lower taxes, cheaper housing, better schools, less congestion, way lower unemployment rates, clean and honest governments, nature in abundance.
CA has: better weather.August 3, 2008 at 9:39 AM #251173jficquette
ParticipantI think no one wants to leave but feel they should so they gather strength from others who feel the same way.
John
August 3, 2008 at 9:39 AM #251332jficquette
ParticipantI think no one wants to leave but feel they should so they gather strength from others who feel the same way.
John
August 3, 2008 at 9:39 AM #251340jficquette
ParticipantI think no one wants to leave but feel they should so they gather strength from others who feel the same way.
John
August 3, 2008 at 9:39 AM #251398jficquette
ParticipantI think no one wants to leave but feel they should so they gather strength from others who feel the same way.
John
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
