- This topic has 315 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 15, 2008 at 9:05 PM #13039June 15, 2008 at 9:15 PM #222879meadandaleParticipant
Disclaimer: I’m not voting for McCain and he represents everything that is turning me off about the current GOP.
Having said that, are you suggesting that we (conservatives) or we (voters in general) should hold McCain to a higher standard than we hold someone like, oh I don’t know, Bill Clinton?
He had quite the moral compass, didn’t he? Will you judge McCain differently than you’ve judged Bill?
June 15, 2008 at 9:15 PM #222986meadandaleParticipantDisclaimer: I’m not voting for McCain and he represents everything that is turning me off about the current GOP.
Having said that, are you suggesting that we (conservatives) or we (voters in general) should hold McCain to a higher standard than we hold someone like, oh I don’t know, Bill Clinton?
He had quite the moral compass, didn’t he? Will you judge McCain differently than you’ve judged Bill?
June 15, 2008 at 9:15 PM #222998meadandaleParticipantDisclaimer: I’m not voting for McCain and he represents everything that is turning me off about the current GOP.
Having said that, are you suggesting that we (conservatives) or we (voters in general) should hold McCain to a higher standard than we hold someone like, oh I don’t know, Bill Clinton?
He had quite the moral compass, didn’t he? Will you judge McCain differently than you’ve judged Bill?
June 15, 2008 at 9:15 PM #223032meadandaleParticipantDisclaimer: I’m not voting for McCain and he represents everything that is turning me off about the current GOP.
Having said that, are you suggesting that we (conservatives) or we (voters in general) should hold McCain to a higher standard than we hold someone like, oh I don’t know, Bill Clinton?
He had quite the moral compass, didn’t he? Will you judge McCain differently than you’ve judged Bill?
June 15, 2008 at 9:15 PM #223045meadandaleParticipantDisclaimer: I’m not voting for McCain and he represents everything that is turning me off about the current GOP.
Having said that, are you suggesting that we (conservatives) or we (voters in general) should hold McCain to a higher standard than we hold someone like, oh I don’t know, Bill Clinton?
He had quite the moral compass, didn’t he? Will you judge McCain differently than you’ve judged Bill?
June 15, 2008 at 9:22 PM #222885TheBreezeParticipantBill needed the occasional BJ from a third-party every now and then, but he was a damn fine president. America has never been stronger than it was under Clinton. No way would Clinton have fallen asleep on the job and allowed 4,000 Americans to be killed in a terrorist attack.
McCain on the other hand is a moral trainwreck. He was a proud member of the Keating Five and his entire election team is made up of lobbyists. I’m not so sure that McCain wouldn’t be even worse than Bush — if such a thing were even possible.
June 15, 2008 at 9:22 PM #222991TheBreezeParticipantBill needed the occasional BJ from a third-party every now and then, but he was a damn fine president. America has never been stronger than it was under Clinton. No way would Clinton have fallen asleep on the job and allowed 4,000 Americans to be killed in a terrorist attack.
McCain on the other hand is a moral trainwreck. He was a proud member of the Keating Five and his entire election team is made up of lobbyists. I’m not so sure that McCain wouldn’t be even worse than Bush — if such a thing were even possible.
June 15, 2008 at 9:22 PM #223003TheBreezeParticipantBill needed the occasional BJ from a third-party every now and then, but he was a damn fine president. America has never been stronger than it was under Clinton. No way would Clinton have fallen asleep on the job and allowed 4,000 Americans to be killed in a terrorist attack.
McCain on the other hand is a moral trainwreck. He was a proud member of the Keating Five and his entire election team is made up of lobbyists. I’m not so sure that McCain wouldn’t be even worse than Bush — if such a thing were even possible.
June 15, 2008 at 9:22 PM #223035TheBreezeParticipantBill needed the occasional BJ from a third-party every now and then, but he was a damn fine president. America has never been stronger than it was under Clinton. No way would Clinton have fallen asleep on the job and allowed 4,000 Americans to be killed in a terrorist attack.
McCain on the other hand is a moral trainwreck. He was a proud member of the Keating Five and his entire election team is made up of lobbyists. I’m not so sure that McCain wouldn’t be even worse than Bush — if such a thing were even possible.
June 15, 2008 at 9:22 PM #223050TheBreezeParticipantBill needed the occasional BJ from a third-party every now and then, but he was a damn fine president. America has never been stronger than it was under Clinton. No way would Clinton have fallen asleep on the job and allowed 4,000 Americans to be killed in a terrorist attack.
McCain on the other hand is a moral trainwreck. He was a proud member of the Keating Five and his entire election team is made up of lobbyists. I’m not so sure that McCain wouldn’t be even worse than Bush — if such a thing were even possible.
June 15, 2008 at 9:28 PM #222890AnonymousGuestmeandandale, I guess you missed my point.
June 15, 2008 at 9:28 PM #222996AnonymousGuestmeandandale, I guess you missed my point.
June 15, 2008 at 9:28 PM #223008AnonymousGuestmeandandale, I guess you missed my point.
June 15, 2008 at 9:28 PM #223040AnonymousGuestmeandandale, I guess you missed my point.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.