- This topic has 65 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 6 months ago by gdcox.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 6, 2008 at 11:53 AM #12966June 6, 2008 at 12:51 PM #218407sd_bearParticipant
Who says anybody has to pay the money back? I believe nobody should foot any bill, so people/banks who made bad investments will go bankrupt.
June 6, 2008 at 12:51 PM #218569sd_bearParticipantWho says anybody has to pay the money back? I believe nobody should foot any bill, so people/banks who made bad investments will go bankrupt.
June 6, 2008 at 12:51 PM #218550sd_bearParticipantWho says anybody has to pay the money back? I believe nobody should foot any bill, so people/banks who made bad investments will go bankrupt.
June 6, 2008 at 12:51 PM #218516sd_bearParticipantWho says anybody has to pay the money back? I believe nobody should foot any bill, so people/banks who made bad investments will go bankrupt.
June 6, 2008 at 12:51 PM #218500sd_bearParticipantWho says anybody has to pay the money back? I believe nobody should foot any bill, so people/banks who made bad investments will go bankrupt.
June 6, 2008 at 1:00 PM #218596XBoxBoyParticipantThe best scenario would be for the government to stay out of things, and to let the markets do what they need to do. That would return prices to where they are valued by the market, and would greatly discourage people from participating in a future bubble like the one we are witnessing pop. It might be unpleasant medicine, but it would be far better in the long run.
However, I can pretty much guarantee that won’t happen. Of course what will happen is a constant flow of government bailouts, either to investment banks as loans, or to joe6pack in the form of stimulus checks. Mix with that a healthy dose of inflation (does anyone seriously believe the government reported figures of only 2-3%?)
As to what’s the best we can hope for? Personally, I think it would be for those investing money in the US to get a clue as to how bad their investments are turning out and to do something about it.
Ironically, that might be starting to happen. A while back a Saudi oil minister was quoted as saying that for every percent the dollar fell, oil prices had to rise by $5. I’ve started to wonder if OPEC isn’t quietly telling Bush and Paulson behind doors that if they don’t stop the dollar’s decline, the oil countries are going to make them pay. This would explain a number of recent comments by fed officials and others about stopping lowering interest rates. Of course I could be all wet, and in desperate need of removing my tin foil hat.
Just my thoughts,
XBoxBoy
June 6, 2008 at 1:00 PM #218580XBoxBoyParticipantThe best scenario would be for the government to stay out of things, and to let the markets do what they need to do. That would return prices to where they are valued by the market, and would greatly discourage people from participating in a future bubble like the one we are witnessing pop. It might be unpleasant medicine, but it would be far better in the long run.
However, I can pretty much guarantee that won’t happen. Of course what will happen is a constant flow of government bailouts, either to investment banks as loans, or to joe6pack in the form of stimulus checks. Mix with that a healthy dose of inflation (does anyone seriously believe the government reported figures of only 2-3%?)
As to what’s the best we can hope for? Personally, I think it would be for those investing money in the US to get a clue as to how bad their investments are turning out and to do something about it.
Ironically, that might be starting to happen. A while back a Saudi oil minister was quoted as saying that for every percent the dollar fell, oil prices had to rise by $5. I’ve started to wonder if OPEC isn’t quietly telling Bush and Paulson behind doors that if they don’t stop the dollar’s decline, the oil countries are going to make them pay. This would explain a number of recent comments by fed officials and others about stopping lowering interest rates. Of course I could be all wet, and in desperate need of removing my tin foil hat.
Just my thoughts,
XBoxBoy
June 6, 2008 at 1:00 PM #218436XBoxBoyParticipantThe best scenario would be for the government to stay out of things, and to let the markets do what they need to do. That would return prices to where they are valued by the market, and would greatly discourage people from participating in a future bubble like the one we are witnessing pop. It might be unpleasant medicine, but it would be far better in the long run.
However, I can pretty much guarantee that won’t happen. Of course what will happen is a constant flow of government bailouts, either to investment banks as loans, or to joe6pack in the form of stimulus checks. Mix with that a healthy dose of inflation (does anyone seriously believe the government reported figures of only 2-3%?)
As to what’s the best we can hope for? Personally, I think it would be for those investing money in the US to get a clue as to how bad their investments are turning out and to do something about it.
Ironically, that might be starting to happen. A while back a Saudi oil minister was quoted as saying that for every percent the dollar fell, oil prices had to rise by $5. I’ve started to wonder if OPEC isn’t quietly telling Bush and Paulson behind doors that if they don’t stop the dollar’s decline, the oil countries are going to make them pay. This would explain a number of recent comments by fed officials and others about stopping lowering interest rates. Of course I could be all wet, and in desperate need of removing my tin foil hat.
Just my thoughts,
XBoxBoy
June 6, 2008 at 1:00 PM #218546XBoxBoyParticipantThe best scenario would be for the government to stay out of things, and to let the markets do what they need to do. That would return prices to where they are valued by the market, and would greatly discourage people from participating in a future bubble like the one we are witnessing pop. It might be unpleasant medicine, but it would be far better in the long run.
However, I can pretty much guarantee that won’t happen. Of course what will happen is a constant flow of government bailouts, either to investment banks as loans, or to joe6pack in the form of stimulus checks. Mix with that a healthy dose of inflation (does anyone seriously believe the government reported figures of only 2-3%?)
As to what’s the best we can hope for? Personally, I think it would be for those investing money in the US to get a clue as to how bad their investments are turning out and to do something about it.
Ironically, that might be starting to happen. A while back a Saudi oil minister was quoted as saying that for every percent the dollar fell, oil prices had to rise by $5. I’ve started to wonder if OPEC isn’t quietly telling Bush and Paulson behind doors that if they don’t stop the dollar’s decline, the oil countries are going to make them pay. This would explain a number of recent comments by fed officials and others about stopping lowering interest rates. Of course I could be all wet, and in desperate need of removing my tin foil hat.
Just my thoughts,
XBoxBoy
June 6, 2008 at 1:00 PM #218528XBoxBoyParticipantThe best scenario would be for the government to stay out of things, and to let the markets do what they need to do. That would return prices to where they are valued by the market, and would greatly discourage people from participating in a future bubble like the one we are witnessing pop. It might be unpleasant medicine, but it would be far better in the long run.
However, I can pretty much guarantee that won’t happen. Of course what will happen is a constant flow of government bailouts, either to investment banks as loans, or to joe6pack in the form of stimulus checks. Mix with that a healthy dose of inflation (does anyone seriously believe the government reported figures of only 2-3%?)
As to what’s the best we can hope for? Personally, I think it would be for those investing money in the US to get a clue as to how bad their investments are turning out and to do something about it.
Ironically, that might be starting to happen. A while back a Saudi oil minister was quoted as saying that for every percent the dollar fell, oil prices had to rise by $5. I’ve started to wonder if OPEC isn’t quietly telling Bush and Paulson behind doors that if they don’t stop the dollar’s decline, the oil countries are going to make them pay. This would explain a number of recent comments by fed officials and others about stopping lowering interest rates. Of course I could be all wet, and in desperate need of removing my tin foil hat.
Just my thoughts,
XBoxBoy
June 6, 2008 at 1:03 PM #218533HarryBoschParticipantI have friends and relatives who are not in debt and who have lived by a policy of living below their means. My brother-in-law used to say “It’s not about how much money you make but how much you save.”
He will have his house paid off very soon, will collect a pension and has no credit card or car loans debt. I know he and his wife have made far less per year than myself and my wife have over the years.
All he – and others like him – should do is continue to pay his own fixed rate mortgage. He lived conservatively. It would be unfair – outrageous – to ask him and others to pay for other people’s losses.
June 6, 2008 at 1:03 PM #218441HarryBoschParticipantI have friends and relatives who are not in debt and who have lived by a policy of living below their means. My brother-in-law used to say “It’s not about how much money you make but how much you save.”
He will have his house paid off very soon, will collect a pension and has no credit card or car loans debt. I know he and his wife have made far less per year than myself and my wife have over the years.
All he – and others like him – should do is continue to pay his own fixed rate mortgage. He lived conservatively. It would be unfair – outrageous – to ask him and others to pay for other people’s losses.
June 6, 2008 at 1:03 PM #218551HarryBoschParticipantI have friends and relatives who are not in debt and who have lived by a policy of living below their means. My brother-in-law used to say “It’s not about how much money you make but how much you save.”
He will have his house paid off very soon, will collect a pension and has no credit card or car loans debt. I know he and his wife have made far less per year than myself and my wife have over the years.
All he – and others like him – should do is continue to pay his own fixed rate mortgage. He lived conservatively. It would be unfair – outrageous – to ask him and others to pay for other people’s losses.
June 6, 2008 at 1:03 PM #218601HarryBoschParticipantI have friends and relatives who are not in debt and who have lived by a policy of living below their means. My brother-in-law used to say “It’s not about how much money you make but how much you save.”
He will have his house paid off very soon, will collect a pension and has no credit card or car loans debt. I know he and his wife have made far less per year than myself and my wife have over the years.
All he – and others like him – should do is continue to pay his own fixed rate mortgage. He lived conservatively. It would be unfair – outrageous – to ask him and others to pay for other people’s losses.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.