- This topic has 30 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by DWCAP.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 14, 2008 at 8:14 AM #11818February 14, 2008 at 8:23 AM #153068RaybyrnesParticipant
Bank have 2 functions. Thye need to originate loans nd they also need to service the loasn. If they do not remain competitive they risk losing the fee income coming in off the loa. So banks will difinitely want to keep these loans on their books. Whether tthe approach is to be proactive by contacting their borrowers or to be reactive by waitive for loan payoffs form a different lender and then offering the loan at the same or better rate for keeping it with that organization.
February 14, 2008 at 8:23 AM #153346RaybyrnesParticipantBank have 2 functions. Thye need to originate loans nd they also need to service the loasn. If they do not remain competitive they risk losing the fee income coming in off the loa. So banks will difinitely want to keep these loans on their books. Whether tthe approach is to be proactive by contacting their borrowers or to be reactive by waitive for loan payoffs form a different lender and then offering the loan at the same or better rate for keeping it with that organization.
February 14, 2008 at 8:23 AM #153363RaybyrnesParticipantBank have 2 functions. Thye need to originate loans nd they also need to service the loasn. If they do not remain competitive they risk losing the fee income coming in off the loa. So banks will difinitely want to keep these loans on their books. Whether tthe approach is to be proactive by contacting their borrowers or to be reactive by waitive for loan payoffs form a different lender and then offering the loan at the same or better rate for keeping it with that organization.
February 14, 2008 at 8:23 AM #153370RaybyrnesParticipantBank have 2 functions. Thye need to originate loans nd they also need to service the loasn. If they do not remain competitive they risk losing the fee income coming in off the loa. So banks will difinitely want to keep these loans on their books. Whether tthe approach is to be proactive by contacting their borrowers or to be reactive by waitive for loan payoffs form a different lender and then offering the loan at the same or better rate for keeping it with that organization.
February 14, 2008 at 8:23 AM #153442RaybyrnesParticipantBank have 2 functions. Thye need to originate loans nd they also need to service the loasn. If they do not remain competitive they risk losing the fee income coming in off the loa. So banks will difinitely want to keep these loans on their books. Whether tthe approach is to be proactive by contacting their borrowers or to be reactive by waitive for loan payoffs form a different lender and then offering the loan at the same or better rate for keeping it with that organization.
February 14, 2008 at 1:51 PM #153206HereWeGoParticipantNow we watch the long end of the Treasury market, as well as the FNMA/FRM debt pricing.
February 14, 2008 at 1:51 PM #153481HereWeGoParticipantNow we watch the long end of the Treasury market, as well as the FNMA/FRM debt pricing.
February 14, 2008 at 1:51 PM #153498HereWeGoParticipantNow we watch the long end of the Treasury market, as well as the FNMA/FRM debt pricing.
February 14, 2008 at 1:51 PM #153506HereWeGoParticipantNow we watch the long end of the Treasury market, as well as the FNMA/FRM debt pricing.
February 14, 2008 at 1:51 PM #153578HereWeGoParticipantNow we watch the long end of the Treasury market, as well as the FNMA/FRM debt pricing.
February 14, 2008 at 4:16 PM #153289barnaby33ParticipantThe same people that didn’t have 20% down and verifiable assets/income before, still don’t. Raising the caps was pointless. Not to mention that the majority of mortgages, except in super frothy areas, were for less than 400k. Thats because you actually have to qualify for them, based on income.
Josh
February 14, 2008 at 4:16 PM #153561barnaby33ParticipantThe same people that didn’t have 20% down and verifiable assets/income before, still don’t. Raising the caps was pointless. Not to mention that the majority of mortgages, except in super frothy areas, were for less than 400k. Thats because you actually have to qualify for them, based on income.
Josh
February 14, 2008 at 4:16 PM #153580barnaby33ParticipantThe same people that didn’t have 20% down and verifiable assets/income before, still don’t. Raising the caps was pointless. Not to mention that the majority of mortgages, except in super frothy areas, were for less than 400k. Thats because you actually have to qualify for them, based on income.
Josh
February 14, 2008 at 4:16 PM #153584barnaby33ParticipantThe same people that didn’t have 20% down and verifiable assets/income before, still don’t. Raising the caps was pointless. Not to mention that the majority of mortgages, except in super frothy areas, were for less than 400k. Thats because you actually have to qualify for them, based on income.
Josh
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.