- This topic has 30 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 1 month ago by
DWCAP.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
February 14, 2008 at 8:14 AM #11818
-
February 14, 2008 at 8:23 AM #153068
Raybyrnes
ParticipantBank have 2 functions. Thye need to originate loans nd they also need to service the loasn. If they do not remain competitive they risk losing the fee income coming in off the loa. So banks will difinitely want to keep these loans on their books. Whether tthe approach is to be proactive by contacting their borrowers or to be reactive by waitive for loan payoffs form a different lender and then offering the loan at the same or better rate for keeping it with that organization.
-
February 14, 2008 at 1:51 PM #153206
HereWeGo
ParticipantNow we watch the long end of the Treasury market, as well as the FNMA/FRM debt pricing.
-
February 14, 2008 at 1:51 PM #153481
HereWeGo
ParticipantNow we watch the long end of the Treasury market, as well as the FNMA/FRM debt pricing.
-
February 14, 2008 at 1:51 PM #153498
HereWeGo
ParticipantNow we watch the long end of the Treasury market, as well as the FNMA/FRM debt pricing.
-
February 14, 2008 at 1:51 PM #153506
HereWeGo
ParticipantNow we watch the long end of the Treasury market, as well as the FNMA/FRM debt pricing.
-
February 14, 2008 at 1:51 PM #153578
HereWeGo
ParticipantNow we watch the long end of the Treasury market, as well as the FNMA/FRM debt pricing.
-
-
February 14, 2008 at 8:23 AM #153346
Raybyrnes
ParticipantBank have 2 functions. Thye need to originate loans nd they also need to service the loasn. If they do not remain competitive they risk losing the fee income coming in off the loa. So banks will difinitely want to keep these loans on their books. Whether tthe approach is to be proactive by contacting their borrowers or to be reactive by waitive for loan payoffs form a different lender and then offering the loan at the same or better rate for keeping it with that organization.
-
February 14, 2008 at 8:23 AM #153363
Raybyrnes
ParticipantBank have 2 functions. Thye need to originate loans nd they also need to service the loasn. If they do not remain competitive they risk losing the fee income coming in off the loa. So banks will difinitely want to keep these loans on their books. Whether tthe approach is to be proactive by contacting their borrowers or to be reactive by waitive for loan payoffs form a different lender and then offering the loan at the same or better rate for keeping it with that organization.
-
February 14, 2008 at 8:23 AM #153370
Raybyrnes
ParticipantBank have 2 functions. Thye need to originate loans nd they also need to service the loasn. If they do not remain competitive they risk losing the fee income coming in off the loa. So banks will difinitely want to keep these loans on their books. Whether tthe approach is to be proactive by contacting their borrowers or to be reactive by waitive for loan payoffs form a different lender and then offering the loan at the same or better rate for keeping it with that organization.
-
February 14, 2008 at 8:23 AM #153442
Raybyrnes
ParticipantBank have 2 functions. Thye need to originate loans nd they also need to service the loasn. If they do not remain competitive they risk losing the fee income coming in off the loa. So banks will difinitely want to keep these loans on their books. Whether tthe approach is to be proactive by contacting their borrowers or to be reactive by waitive for loan payoffs form a different lender and then offering the loan at the same or better rate for keeping it with that organization.
-
February 14, 2008 at 4:16 PM #153289
barnaby33
ParticipantThe same people that didn’t have 20% down and verifiable assets/income before, still don’t. Raising the caps was pointless. Not to mention that the majority of mortgages, except in super frothy areas, were for less than 400k. Thats because you actually have to qualify for them, based on income.
Josh
-
February 14, 2008 at 4:38 PM #153299
Chris Scoreboard Johnston
ParticipantThe sell off on the long end of the yield curve ( rate rise ) is raising rates anyway, so this effect is offset already to some degree. It would have helped people like me who could have paid down my balance to the conforming level then refi’d, but the rates have already gone up quite a bit in the last couple of weeks, so it is now not worth it.
The problem is, I am not the demographic that needs help, so maybe in the end this move by the govt does not help much.
-
February 14, 2008 at 8:29 PM #153369
sdrealtor
ParticipantThe GSE’s are targeting early April for the roll out of the new loan programs from what I have heard.
-
February 14, 2008 at 8:29 PM #153641
sdrealtor
ParticipantThe GSE’s are targeting early April for the roll out of the new loan programs from what I have heard.
-
February 14, 2008 at 8:29 PM #153661
sdrealtor
ParticipantThe GSE’s are targeting early April for the roll out of the new loan programs from what I have heard.
-
February 14, 2008 at 8:29 PM #153664
sdrealtor
ParticipantThe GSE’s are targeting early April for the roll out of the new loan programs from what I have heard.
-
February 14, 2008 at 8:29 PM #153738
sdrealtor
ParticipantThe GSE’s are targeting early April for the roll out of the new loan programs from what I have heard.
-
-
February 14, 2008 at 4:38 PM #153571
Chris Scoreboard Johnston
ParticipantThe sell off on the long end of the yield curve ( rate rise ) is raising rates anyway, so this effect is offset already to some degree. It would have helped people like me who could have paid down my balance to the conforming level then refi’d, but the rates have already gone up quite a bit in the last couple of weeks, so it is now not worth it.
The problem is, I am not the demographic that needs help, so maybe in the end this move by the govt does not help much.
-
February 14, 2008 at 4:38 PM #153590
Chris Scoreboard Johnston
ParticipantThe sell off on the long end of the yield curve ( rate rise ) is raising rates anyway, so this effect is offset already to some degree. It would have helped people like me who could have paid down my balance to the conforming level then refi’d, but the rates have already gone up quite a bit in the last couple of weeks, so it is now not worth it.
The problem is, I am not the demographic that needs help, so maybe in the end this move by the govt does not help much.
-
February 14, 2008 at 4:38 PM #153594
Chris Scoreboard Johnston
ParticipantThe sell off on the long end of the yield curve ( rate rise ) is raising rates anyway, so this effect is offset already to some degree. It would have helped people like me who could have paid down my balance to the conforming level then refi’d, but the rates have already gone up quite a bit in the last couple of weeks, so it is now not worth it.
The problem is, I am not the demographic that needs help, so maybe in the end this move by the govt does not help much.
-
February 14, 2008 at 4:38 PM #153669
Chris Scoreboard Johnston
ParticipantThe sell off on the long end of the yield curve ( rate rise ) is raising rates anyway, so this effect is offset already to some degree. It would have helped people like me who could have paid down my balance to the conforming level then refi’d, but the rates have already gone up quite a bit in the last couple of weeks, so it is now not worth it.
The problem is, I am not the demographic that needs help, so maybe in the end this move by the govt does not help much.
-
-
February 14, 2008 at 4:16 PM #153561
barnaby33
ParticipantThe same people that didn’t have 20% down and verifiable assets/income before, still don’t. Raising the caps was pointless. Not to mention that the majority of mortgages, except in super frothy areas, were for less than 400k. Thats because you actually have to qualify for them, based on income.
Josh
-
February 14, 2008 at 4:16 PM #153580
barnaby33
ParticipantThe same people that didn’t have 20% down and verifiable assets/income before, still don’t. Raising the caps was pointless. Not to mention that the majority of mortgages, except in super frothy areas, were for less than 400k. Thats because you actually have to qualify for them, based on income.
Josh
-
February 14, 2008 at 4:16 PM #153584
barnaby33
ParticipantThe same people that didn’t have 20% down and verifiable assets/income before, still don’t. Raising the caps was pointless. Not to mention that the majority of mortgages, except in super frothy areas, were for less than 400k. Thats because you actually have to qualify for them, based on income.
Josh
-
February 14, 2008 at 4:16 PM #153659
barnaby33
ParticipantThe same people that didn’t have 20% down and verifiable assets/income before, still don’t. Raising the caps was pointless. Not to mention that the majority of mortgages, except in super frothy areas, were for less than 400k. Thats because you actually have to qualify for them, based on income.
Josh
-
February 14, 2008 at 11:55 PM #153449
DWCAP
ParticipantSD R,
So the GSE’s are going for early April. So we should be up and running in late May since NOTHING in government is done on time, especially when the regulator isnt too happy about all this. Isnt this suppose to end in dec 2008? So we will get what, 7 months outa this? Most of which is in the slowest time of the year for home sales. Just enough time for the banks to try to get alot of people to refi the risk to the GSE’s, and pass all their crap to the american tax payer. And they said this wasnt a bail out.
-
February 14, 2008 at 11:55 PM #153720
DWCAP
ParticipantSD R,
So the GSE’s are going for early April. So we should be up and running in late May since NOTHING in government is done on time, especially when the regulator isnt too happy about all this. Isnt this suppose to end in dec 2008? So we will get what, 7 months outa this? Most of which is in the slowest time of the year for home sales. Just enough time for the banks to try to get alot of people to refi the risk to the GSE’s, and pass all their crap to the american tax payer. And they said this wasnt a bail out.
-
February 14, 2008 at 11:55 PM #153741
DWCAP
ParticipantSD R,
So the GSE’s are going for early April. So we should be up and running in late May since NOTHING in government is done on time, especially when the regulator isnt too happy about all this. Isnt this suppose to end in dec 2008? So we will get what, 7 months outa this? Most of which is in the slowest time of the year for home sales. Just enough time for the banks to try to get alot of people to refi the risk to the GSE’s, and pass all their crap to the american tax payer. And they said this wasnt a bail out.
-
February 14, 2008 at 11:55 PM #153743
DWCAP
ParticipantSD R,
So the GSE’s are going for early April. So we should be up and running in late May since NOTHING in government is done on time, especially when the regulator isnt too happy about all this. Isnt this suppose to end in dec 2008? So we will get what, 7 months outa this? Most of which is in the slowest time of the year for home sales. Just enough time for the banks to try to get alot of people to refi the risk to the GSE’s, and pass all their crap to the american tax payer. And they said this wasnt a bail out.
-
February 14, 2008 at 11:55 PM #153821
DWCAP
ParticipantSD R,
So the GSE’s are going for early April. So we should be up and running in late May since NOTHING in government is done on time, especially when the regulator isnt too happy about all this. Isnt this suppose to end in dec 2008? So we will get what, 7 months outa this? Most of which is in the slowest time of the year for home sales. Just enough time for the banks to try to get alot of people to refi the risk to the GSE’s, and pass all their crap to the american tax payer. And they said this wasnt a bail out.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.