- This topic has 35 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 7 months ago by
sdduuuude.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 31, 2008 at 7:00 AM #11677January 31, 2008 at 1:53 PM #146137
JWM in SD
ParticipantJWM in SD
Yeah, too bad no one told her that the agent only has fiduciary responsibilty to the seller. Of course, she probably had Heloc $’s in mind when she signed the paperwork.January 31, 2008 at 1:53 PM #146381JWM in SD
ParticipantJWM in SD
Yeah, too bad no one told her that the agent only has fiduciary responsibilty to the seller. Of course, she probably had Heloc $’s in mind when she signed the paperwork.January 31, 2008 at 1:53 PM #146408JWM in SD
ParticipantJWM in SD
Yeah, too bad no one told her that the agent only has fiduciary responsibilty to the seller. Of course, she probably had Heloc $’s in mind when she signed the paperwork.January 31, 2008 at 1:53 PM #146419JWM in SD
ParticipantJWM in SD
Yeah, too bad no one told her that the agent only has fiduciary responsibilty to the seller. Of course, she probably had Heloc $’s in mind when she signed the paperwork.January 31, 2008 at 1:53 PM #146479JWM in SD
ParticipantJWM in SD
Yeah, too bad no one told her that the agent only has fiduciary responsibilty to the seller. Of course, she probably had Heloc $’s in mind when she signed the paperwork.January 31, 2008 at 3:04 PM #146157patientlywaiting
ParticipantWas Mr. Little Mrs Ummel’s buyer’s agent?
If the agent is the buyer’s agents, then of course, he had the fiduciary obligation to tell the buyer about all the comps in the neighborhood. I expect a big judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
Mrs. Ummel should have used the Internet and posted on Piggington before buying. It was stupid on her part to trust her real estate agent.
Who, these days, buys a house solely based on the information provided by the agent?
January 31, 2008 at 3:04 PM #146401patientlywaiting
ParticipantWas Mr. Little Mrs Ummel’s buyer’s agent?
If the agent is the buyer’s agents, then of course, he had the fiduciary obligation to tell the buyer about all the comps in the neighborhood. I expect a big judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
Mrs. Ummel should have used the Internet and posted on Piggington before buying. It was stupid on her part to trust her real estate agent.
Who, these days, buys a house solely based on the information provided by the agent?
January 31, 2008 at 3:04 PM #146498patientlywaiting
ParticipantWas Mr. Little Mrs Ummel’s buyer’s agent?
If the agent is the buyer’s agents, then of course, he had the fiduciary obligation to tell the buyer about all the comps in the neighborhood. I expect a big judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
Mrs. Ummel should have used the Internet and posted on Piggington before buying. It was stupid on her part to trust her real estate agent.
Who, these days, buys a house solely based on the information provided by the agent?
January 31, 2008 at 3:04 PM #146428patientlywaiting
ParticipantWas Mr. Little Mrs Ummel’s buyer’s agent?
If the agent is the buyer’s agents, then of course, he had the fiduciary obligation to tell the buyer about all the comps in the neighborhood. I expect a big judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
Mrs. Ummel should have used the Internet and posted on Piggington before buying. It was stupid on her part to trust her real estate agent.
Who, these days, buys a house solely based on the information provided by the agent?
January 31, 2008 at 3:04 PM #146439patientlywaiting
ParticipantWas Mr. Little Mrs Ummel’s buyer’s agent?
If the agent is the buyer’s agents, then of course, he had the fiduciary obligation to tell the buyer about all the comps in the neighborhood. I expect a big judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
Mrs. Ummel should have used the Internet and posted on Piggington before buying. It was stupid on her part to trust her real estate agent.
Who, these days, buys a house solely based on the information provided by the agent?
January 31, 2008 at 3:18 PM #146504Bugs
ParticipantBack in mid-2005 there were very few people listening to us.
January 31, 2008 at 3:18 PM #146433Bugs
ParticipantBack in mid-2005 there were very few people listening to us.
January 31, 2008 at 3:18 PM #146444Bugs
ParticipantBack in mid-2005 there were very few people listening to us.
January 31, 2008 at 3:18 PM #146406Bugs
ParticipantBack in mid-2005 there were very few people listening to us.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.