- This topic has 35 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 3 months ago by
sdduuuude.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 31, 2008 at 3:18 PM #146162January 31, 2008 at 11:34 PM #146447
j
ParticipantJust proves that buyers agents are not needed, if you can read (most can’t look at all the option ARM loans). Save the 3% and have only one agent working against you.
January 31, 2008 at 11:34 PM #146790j
ParticipantJust proves that buyers agents are not needed, if you can read (most can’t look at all the option ARM loans). Save the 3% and have only one agent working against you.
January 31, 2008 at 11:34 PM #146730j
ParticipantJust proves that buyers agents are not needed, if you can read (most can’t look at all the option ARM loans). Save the 3% and have only one agent working against you.
January 31, 2008 at 11:34 PM #146718j
ParticipantJust proves that buyers agents are not needed, if you can read (most can’t look at all the option ARM loans). Save the 3% and have only one agent working against you.
January 31, 2008 at 11:34 PM #146691j
ParticipantJust proves that buyers agents are not needed, if you can read (most can’t look at all the option ARM loans). Save the 3% and have only one agent working against you.
February 1, 2008 at 8:15 AM #146839sdrealtor
ParticipantI guess our friend J throws out the whole bunch when he finds one sour grape.
February 1, 2008 at 8:15 AM #146741sdrealtor
ParticipantI guess our friend J throws out the whole bunch when he finds one sour grape.
February 1, 2008 at 8:15 AM #146497sdrealtor
ParticipantI guess our friend J throws out the whole bunch when he finds one sour grape.
February 1, 2008 at 8:15 AM #146767sdrealtor
ParticipantI guess our friend J throws out the whole bunch when he finds one sour grape.
February 1, 2008 at 8:15 AM #146779sdrealtor
ParticipantI guess our friend J throws out the whole bunch when he finds one sour grape.
February 1, 2008 at 8:26 AM #146844Bugs
ParticipantI would say that most buyers are better off having some representation in the transaction. I think any conflicts of interest could be resolved by changing the compensation structure a little.
Pick an arbitrary price point that’s well below what the buyer is prepared to spend and base their agent’s commission on that rather than the actual sale price they negotiate. Bump the percentate up a little to make up the difference. That eliminates all motivation for steering the buyer to properties above that price point so that the agent can concentrate on matching the buyer to the right property at the right price.
Either that, or become a much more active participant in researching and analyzing the sales data so that you can make a more informed decision on your own, hence reducing the need to rely so heavily on your agent’s advice.
February 1, 2008 at 8:26 AM #146746Bugs
ParticipantI would say that most buyers are better off having some representation in the transaction. I think any conflicts of interest could be resolved by changing the compensation structure a little.
Pick an arbitrary price point that’s well below what the buyer is prepared to spend and base their agent’s commission on that rather than the actual sale price they negotiate. Bump the percentate up a little to make up the difference. That eliminates all motivation for steering the buyer to properties above that price point so that the agent can concentrate on matching the buyer to the right property at the right price.
Either that, or become a much more active participant in researching and analyzing the sales data so that you can make a more informed decision on your own, hence reducing the need to rely so heavily on your agent’s advice.
February 1, 2008 at 8:26 AM #146784Bugs
ParticipantI would say that most buyers are better off having some representation in the transaction. I think any conflicts of interest could be resolved by changing the compensation structure a little.
Pick an arbitrary price point that’s well below what the buyer is prepared to spend and base their agent’s commission on that rather than the actual sale price they negotiate. Bump the percentate up a little to make up the difference. That eliminates all motivation for steering the buyer to properties above that price point so that the agent can concentrate on matching the buyer to the right property at the right price.
Either that, or become a much more active participant in researching and analyzing the sales data so that you can make a more informed decision on your own, hence reducing the need to rely so heavily on your agent’s advice.
February 1, 2008 at 8:26 AM #146773Bugs
ParticipantI would say that most buyers are better off having some representation in the transaction. I think any conflicts of interest could be resolved by changing the compensation structure a little.
Pick an arbitrary price point that’s well below what the buyer is prepared to spend and base their agent’s commission on that rather than the actual sale price they negotiate. Bump the percentate up a little to make up the difference. That eliminates all motivation for steering the buyer to properties above that price point so that the agent can concentrate on matching the buyer to the right property at the right price.
Either that, or become a much more active participant in researching and analyzing the sales data so that you can make a more informed decision on your own, hence reducing the need to rely so heavily on your agent’s advice.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.