- This topic has 10 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 7 months ago by
drunkle.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 23, 2008 at 3:49 PM #11615January 23, 2008 at 4:55 PM #141491
alarmclock
ParticipantHow does someone like Lou Dobbs not understand ‘trade deficit’? He uses the words ‘trade debt’ — he is talking about the cumulative trade deficit of 6+ trillion. I don’t understand how someone can make a mistake like that and it gets by the editors.
I just realized today that I am running a trade deficit with the grocery store of about 8% GPP (gross personal product). I appointed a representative to go to the store to shout at them angrily, saying they need to reduce the value of chips & salsa versus the dollar so I can reduce my trade deficit with them. We’ll see how that goes.
January 23, 2008 at 4:55 PM #141716alarmclock
ParticipantHow does someone like Lou Dobbs not understand ‘trade deficit’? He uses the words ‘trade debt’ — he is talking about the cumulative trade deficit of 6+ trillion. I don’t understand how someone can make a mistake like that and it gets by the editors.
I just realized today that I am running a trade deficit with the grocery store of about 8% GPP (gross personal product). I appointed a representative to go to the store to shout at them angrily, saying they need to reduce the value of chips & salsa versus the dollar so I can reduce my trade deficit with them. We’ll see how that goes.
January 23, 2008 at 4:55 PM #141733alarmclock
ParticipantHow does someone like Lou Dobbs not understand ‘trade deficit’? He uses the words ‘trade debt’ — he is talking about the cumulative trade deficit of 6+ trillion. I don’t understand how someone can make a mistake like that and it gets by the editors.
I just realized today that I am running a trade deficit with the grocery store of about 8% GPP (gross personal product). I appointed a representative to go to the store to shout at them angrily, saying they need to reduce the value of chips & salsa versus the dollar so I can reduce my trade deficit with them. We’ll see how that goes.
January 23, 2008 at 4:55 PM #141758alarmclock
ParticipantHow does someone like Lou Dobbs not understand ‘trade deficit’? He uses the words ‘trade debt’ — he is talking about the cumulative trade deficit of 6+ trillion. I don’t understand how someone can make a mistake like that and it gets by the editors.
I just realized today that I am running a trade deficit with the grocery store of about 8% GPP (gross personal product). I appointed a representative to go to the store to shout at them angrily, saying they need to reduce the value of chips & salsa versus the dollar so I can reduce my trade deficit with them. We’ll see how that goes.
January 23, 2008 at 4:55 PM #141819alarmclock
ParticipantHow does someone like Lou Dobbs not understand ‘trade deficit’? He uses the words ‘trade debt’ — he is talking about the cumulative trade deficit of 6+ trillion. I don’t understand how someone can make a mistake like that and it gets by the editors.
I just realized today that I am running a trade deficit with the grocery store of about 8% GPP (gross personal product). I appointed a representative to go to the store to shout at them angrily, saying they need to reduce the value of chips & salsa versus the dollar so I can reduce my trade deficit with them. We’ll see how that goes.
January 23, 2008 at 5:13 PM #141495drunkle
Participantsomeone was ranting about unfair trade agreements… bush? he was talking about import tariffs and how we have “no” tariffs and therefore, they shouldn’t either. does that make any sense? isn’t it our perogative to have or not have import tariffs?
January 23, 2008 at 5:13 PM #141720drunkle
Participantsomeone was ranting about unfair trade agreements… bush? he was talking about import tariffs and how we have “no” tariffs and therefore, they shouldn’t either. does that make any sense? isn’t it our perogative to have or not have import tariffs?
January 23, 2008 at 5:13 PM #141738drunkle
Participantsomeone was ranting about unfair trade agreements… bush? he was talking about import tariffs and how we have “no” tariffs and therefore, they shouldn’t either. does that make any sense? isn’t it our perogative to have or not have import tariffs?
January 23, 2008 at 5:13 PM #141763drunkle
Participantsomeone was ranting about unfair trade agreements… bush? he was talking about import tariffs and how we have “no” tariffs and therefore, they shouldn’t either. does that make any sense? isn’t it our perogative to have or not have import tariffs?
January 23, 2008 at 5:13 PM #141824drunkle
Participantsomeone was ranting about unfair trade agreements… bush? he was talking about import tariffs and how we have “no” tariffs and therefore, they shouldn’t either. does that make any sense? isn’t it our perogative to have or not have import tariffs?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.