- This topic has 65 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 17 years ago by bubba99.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 3, 2007 at 12:32 PM #11057December 3, 2007 at 1:12 PM #108158patientlywaitingParticipant
Looks to me like Paulson is trying to help his buddies on Wall- Street. I’m sure his phone has been ringing off the hook since Wall Street got hammered.
December 3, 2007 at 1:12 PM #108314patientlywaitingParticipantLooks to me like Paulson is trying to help his buddies on Wall- Street. I’m sure his phone has been ringing off the hook since Wall Street got hammered.
December 3, 2007 at 1:12 PM #108300patientlywaitingParticipantLooks to me like Paulson is trying to help his buddies on Wall- Street. I’m sure his phone has been ringing off the hook since Wall Street got hammered.
December 3, 2007 at 1:12 PM #108296patientlywaitingParticipantLooks to me like Paulson is trying to help his buddies on Wall- Street. I’m sure his phone has been ringing off the hook since Wall Street got hammered.
December 3, 2007 at 1:12 PM #108262patientlywaitingParticipantLooks to me like Paulson is trying to help his buddies on Wall- Street. I’m sure his phone has been ringing off the hook since Wall Street got hammered.
December 3, 2007 at 1:16 PM #108319NeetaTParticipantGood point!!!!!
This is all about keeping property prices high so that more tax money can be usurped from the public. I rent also and will soon be renting in San Diego. I guess I should cry to the ACLU.
December 3, 2007 at 1:16 PM #108267NeetaTParticipantGood point!!!!!
This is all about keeping property prices high so that more tax money can be usurped from the public. I rent also and will soon be renting in San Diego. I guess I should cry to the ACLU.
December 3, 2007 at 1:16 PM #108305NeetaTParticipantGood point!!!!!
This is all about keeping property prices high so that more tax money can be usurped from the public. I rent also and will soon be renting in San Diego. I guess I should cry to the ACLU.
December 3, 2007 at 1:16 PM #108301NeetaTParticipantGood point!!!!!
This is all about keeping property prices high so that more tax money can be usurped from the public. I rent also and will soon be renting in San Diego. I guess I should cry to the ACLU.
December 3, 2007 at 1:16 PM #108163NeetaTParticipantGood point!!!!!
This is all about keeping property prices high so that more tax money can be usurped from the public. I rent also and will soon be renting in San Diego. I guess I should cry to the ACLU.
December 3, 2007 at 1:37 PM #108330nostradamusParticipantI have yet to hear any concrete details about how FB’s will be helped.
I don’t think it’s possible to keep prices high, but I didn’t think anything in the past couple RE years was possible. When I graduated UCSD in ’93 I thought SD was overpriced. Man oh man look at it now.
I think the likely “bailouts” will be bailing out the lender and shagging the FB. They’ll stay in “their” homes alright, shackled to some sort of recourse loan with lower interest and a longer term, as their home value goes down like a (_fill in the blank_). Anyone else care to speculate what the details of the bailout might involve?
December 3, 2007 at 1:37 PM #108315nostradamusParticipantI have yet to hear any concrete details about how FB’s will be helped.
I don’t think it’s possible to keep prices high, but I didn’t think anything in the past couple RE years was possible. When I graduated UCSD in ’93 I thought SD was overpriced. Man oh man look at it now.
I think the likely “bailouts” will be bailing out the lender and shagging the FB. They’ll stay in “their” homes alright, shackled to some sort of recourse loan with lower interest and a longer term, as their home value goes down like a (_fill in the blank_). Anyone else care to speculate what the details of the bailout might involve?
December 3, 2007 at 1:37 PM #108311nostradamusParticipantI have yet to hear any concrete details about how FB’s will be helped.
I don’t think it’s possible to keep prices high, but I didn’t think anything in the past couple RE years was possible. When I graduated UCSD in ’93 I thought SD was overpriced. Man oh man look at it now.
I think the likely “bailouts” will be bailing out the lender and shagging the FB. They’ll stay in “their” homes alright, shackled to some sort of recourse loan with lower interest and a longer term, as their home value goes down like a (_fill in the blank_). Anyone else care to speculate what the details of the bailout might involve?
December 3, 2007 at 1:37 PM #108175nostradamusParticipantI have yet to hear any concrete details about how FB’s will be helped.
I don’t think it’s possible to keep prices high, but I didn’t think anything in the past couple RE years was possible. When I graduated UCSD in ’93 I thought SD was overpriced. Man oh man look at it now.
I think the likely “bailouts” will be bailing out the lender and shagging the FB. They’ll stay in “their” homes alright, shackled to some sort of recourse loan with lower interest and a longer term, as their home value goes down like a (_fill in the blank_). Anyone else care to speculate what the details of the bailout might involve?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.