- This topic has 65 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 4 months ago by
bubba99.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 3, 2007 at 12:32 PM #11057December 3, 2007 at 1:12 PM #108158
patientlywaiting
ParticipantLooks to me like Paulson is trying to help his buddies on Wall- Street. I’m sure his phone has been ringing off the hook since Wall Street got hammered.
December 3, 2007 at 1:12 PM #108314patientlywaiting
ParticipantLooks to me like Paulson is trying to help his buddies on Wall- Street. I’m sure his phone has been ringing off the hook since Wall Street got hammered.
December 3, 2007 at 1:12 PM #108300patientlywaiting
ParticipantLooks to me like Paulson is trying to help his buddies on Wall- Street. I’m sure his phone has been ringing off the hook since Wall Street got hammered.
December 3, 2007 at 1:12 PM #108296patientlywaiting
ParticipantLooks to me like Paulson is trying to help his buddies on Wall- Street. I’m sure his phone has been ringing off the hook since Wall Street got hammered.
December 3, 2007 at 1:12 PM #108262patientlywaiting
ParticipantLooks to me like Paulson is trying to help his buddies on Wall- Street. I’m sure his phone has been ringing off the hook since Wall Street got hammered.
December 3, 2007 at 1:16 PM #108319NeetaT
ParticipantGood point!!!!!
This is all about keeping property prices high so that more tax money can be usurped from the public. I rent also and will soon be renting in San Diego. I guess I should cry to the ACLU.
December 3, 2007 at 1:16 PM #108267NeetaT
ParticipantGood point!!!!!
This is all about keeping property prices high so that more tax money can be usurped from the public. I rent also and will soon be renting in San Diego. I guess I should cry to the ACLU.
December 3, 2007 at 1:16 PM #108305NeetaT
ParticipantGood point!!!!!
This is all about keeping property prices high so that more tax money can be usurped from the public. I rent also and will soon be renting in San Diego. I guess I should cry to the ACLU.
December 3, 2007 at 1:16 PM #108301NeetaT
ParticipantGood point!!!!!
This is all about keeping property prices high so that more tax money can be usurped from the public. I rent also and will soon be renting in San Diego. I guess I should cry to the ACLU.
December 3, 2007 at 1:16 PM #108163NeetaT
ParticipantGood point!!!!!
This is all about keeping property prices high so that more tax money can be usurped from the public. I rent also and will soon be renting in San Diego. I guess I should cry to the ACLU.
December 3, 2007 at 1:37 PM #108330nostradamus
ParticipantI have yet to hear any concrete details about how FB’s will be helped.
I don’t think it’s possible to keep prices high, but I didn’t think anything in the past couple RE years was possible. When I graduated UCSD in ’93 I thought SD was overpriced. Man oh man look at it now.
I think the likely “bailouts” will be bailing out the lender and shagging the FB. They’ll stay in “their” homes alright, shackled to some sort of recourse loan with lower interest and a longer term, as their home value goes down like a (_fill in the blank_). Anyone else care to speculate what the details of the bailout might involve?
December 3, 2007 at 1:37 PM #108315nostradamus
ParticipantI have yet to hear any concrete details about how FB’s will be helped.
I don’t think it’s possible to keep prices high, but I didn’t think anything in the past couple RE years was possible. When I graduated UCSD in ’93 I thought SD was overpriced. Man oh man look at it now.
I think the likely “bailouts” will be bailing out the lender and shagging the FB. They’ll stay in “their” homes alright, shackled to some sort of recourse loan with lower interest and a longer term, as their home value goes down like a (_fill in the blank_). Anyone else care to speculate what the details of the bailout might involve?
December 3, 2007 at 1:37 PM #108311nostradamus
ParticipantI have yet to hear any concrete details about how FB’s will be helped.
I don’t think it’s possible to keep prices high, but I didn’t think anything in the past couple RE years was possible. When I graduated UCSD in ’93 I thought SD was overpriced. Man oh man look at it now.
I think the likely “bailouts” will be bailing out the lender and shagging the FB. They’ll stay in “their” homes alright, shackled to some sort of recourse loan with lower interest and a longer term, as their home value goes down like a (_fill in the blank_). Anyone else care to speculate what the details of the bailout might involve?
December 3, 2007 at 1:37 PM #108175nostradamus
ParticipantI have yet to hear any concrete details about how FB’s will be helped.
I don’t think it’s possible to keep prices high, but I didn’t think anything in the past couple RE years was possible. When I graduated UCSD in ’93 I thought SD was overpriced. Man oh man look at it now.
I think the likely “bailouts” will be bailing out the lender and shagging the FB. They’ll stay in “their” homes alright, shackled to some sort of recourse loan with lower interest and a longer term, as their home value goes down like a (_fill in the blank_). Anyone else care to speculate what the details of the bailout might involve?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.