Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
zzzParticipant
[quote=AN]I have another question, is MH more desirable than Point Loma?
The reason why I’m asking is because of this talk about MH, I decided to take a look at what’s available in PL and here is what I found:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100066664-3519_Tennyson_St_San_Diego_CA_92106
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100046777-2902_Poinsettia_Dr_San_Diego_CA_92106
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100030996-3362_Wisteria_Dr_San_Diego_CA_92106
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100018114-3715_Leland_St_San_Diego_CA_92106There are more but you get the idea. PL seems to be priced between 2-2.5x it’s mid to late 80s price. That’s very reasonable to me. Especially since these are PL’s low end homes too.[/quote]
AN, I think you have to look at PL as very distinct areas and some of those examples you gave are close to the flight path with airplane noise, IE Tennyson.
Pointsettia, Leland and Wisteria is a less desirable area close to the PL shopping center, that area is typically not as nice and doesn’t command the premium that homes further West do.
If you want to compare PL to MH on a more apples to apples basis, look for the homes SW of Canon
zzzParticipant[quote=AN]I have another question, is MH more desirable than Point Loma?
The reason why I’m asking is because of this talk about MH, I decided to take a look at what’s available in PL and here is what I found:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100066664-3519_Tennyson_St_San_Diego_CA_92106
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100046777-2902_Poinsettia_Dr_San_Diego_CA_92106
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100030996-3362_Wisteria_Dr_San_Diego_CA_92106
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100018114-3715_Leland_St_San_Diego_CA_92106There are more but you get the idea. PL seems to be priced between 2-2.5x it’s mid to late 80s price. That’s very reasonable to me. Especially since these are PL’s low end homes too.[/quote]
AN, I think you have to look at PL as very distinct areas and some of those examples you gave are close to the flight path with airplane noise, IE Tennyson.
Pointsettia, Leland and Wisteria is a less desirable area close to the PL shopping center, that area is typically not as nice and doesn’t command the premium that homes further West do.
If you want to compare PL to MH on a more apples to apples basis, look for the homes SW of Canon
zzzParticipant[quote=AN]I have another question, is MH more desirable than Point Loma?
The reason why I’m asking is because of this talk about MH, I decided to take a look at what’s available in PL and here is what I found:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100066664-3519_Tennyson_St_San_Diego_CA_92106
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100046777-2902_Poinsettia_Dr_San_Diego_CA_92106
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100030996-3362_Wisteria_Dr_San_Diego_CA_92106
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100018114-3715_Leland_St_San_Diego_CA_92106There are more but you get the idea. PL seems to be priced between 2-2.5x it’s mid to late 80s price. That’s very reasonable to me. Especially since these are PL’s low end homes too.[/quote]
AN, I think you have to look at PL as very distinct areas and some of those examples you gave are close to the flight path with airplane noise, IE Tennyson.
Pointsettia, Leland and Wisteria is a less desirable area close to the PL shopping center, that area is typically not as nice and doesn’t command the premium that homes further West do.
If you want to compare PL to MH on a more apples to apples basis, look for the homes SW of Canon
zzzParticipant[quote=AN]I have another question, is MH more desirable than Point Loma?
The reason why I’m asking is because of this talk about MH, I decided to take a look at what’s available in PL and here is what I found:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100066664-3519_Tennyson_St_San_Diego_CA_92106
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100046777-2902_Poinsettia_Dr_San_Diego_CA_92106
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100030996-3362_Wisteria_Dr_San_Diego_CA_92106
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100018114-3715_Leland_St_San_Diego_CA_92106There are more but you get the idea. PL seems to be priced between 2-2.5x it’s mid to late 80s price. That’s very reasonable to me. Especially since these are PL’s low end homes too.[/quote]
AN, I think you have to look at PL as very distinct areas and some of those examples you gave are close to the flight path with airplane noise, IE Tennyson.
Pointsettia, Leland and Wisteria is a less desirable area close to the PL shopping center, that area is typically not as nice and doesn’t command the premium that homes further West do.
If you want to compare PL to MH on a more apples to apples basis, look for the homes SW of Canon
zzzParticipant[quote=AN]I have another question, is MH more desirable than Point Loma?
The reason why I’m asking is because of this talk about MH, I decided to take a look at what’s available in PL and here is what I found:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100066664-3519_Tennyson_St_San_Diego_CA_92106
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100046777-2902_Poinsettia_Dr_San_Diego_CA_92106
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100030996-3362_Wisteria_Dr_San_Diego_CA_92106
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-100018114-3715_Leland_St_San_Diego_CA_92106There are more but you get the idea. PL seems to be priced between 2-2.5x it’s mid to late 80s price. That’s very reasonable to me. Especially since these are PL’s low end homes too.[/quote]
AN, I think you have to look at PL as very distinct areas and some of those examples you gave are close to the flight path with airplane noise, IE Tennyson.
Pointsettia, Leland and Wisteria is a less desirable area close to the PL shopping center, that area is typically not as nice and doesn’t command the premium that homes further West do.
If you want to compare PL to MH on a more apples to apples basis, look for the homes SW of Canon
zzzParticipant[quote=jpinpb]
AN – The only thing I can figure is lots of doctors want to be in MH and will spend extra to be there. But frankly, that doesn’t really account for the gap disparity still. All of the things MH has relative to LJ or MM has not changed. All the things that zzz mentioned are the same things that appealed to certain people to live in MH and draw the premium it has. It still does not account for why the gap is greater today. I don’t know what has changed and that’s enough to make me think eventually it will capitulate slowly over time.[/quote]JP, my opinion with no factual or historical context is that MH has evolved quite a bit in the last 20 years. There are more services, more restaurants, bars and also people are becoming more green and the traffic is getting worse. So the ideal of not driving or driving very little is very appealing. People also travel a great deal more.
I also imagine the neighborhood has gotten a bit younger with well to do late 20s, early 30s moving into the neighborhood, which will only attract more young affluent couples.
I don’t know how many openly gay people lived in MH in the 70s or 80s, much less gay couples, but I imagine that number has increased, which makes it more appealing for an affluent gay couple to live in MH vs LJ? Also as more gays are now openly coupled up, buying a home together with pooled income versus back in the day where they were buying homes on their own? This is just some anecdotal discussions I’ve had with my gay friends.
Just a couple of guesses as to why the premium has widened?
zzzParticipant[quote=jpinpb]
AN – The only thing I can figure is lots of doctors want to be in MH and will spend extra to be there. But frankly, that doesn’t really account for the gap disparity still. All of the things MH has relative to LJ or MM has not changed. All the things that zzz mentioned are the same things that appealed to certain people to live in MH and draw the premium it has. It still does not account for why the gap is greater today. I don’t know what has changed and that’s enough to make me think eventually it will capitulate slowly over time.[/quote]JP, my opinion with no factual or historical context is that MH has evolved quite a bit in the last 20 years. There are more services, more restaurants, bars and also people are becoming more green and the traffic is getting worse. So the ideal of not driving or driving very little is very appealing. People also travel a great deal more.
I also imagine the neighborhood has gotten a bit younger with well to do late 20s, early 30s moving into the neighborhood, which will only attract more young affluent couples.
I don’t know how many openly gay people lived in MH in the 70s or 80s, much less gay couples, but I imagine that number has increased, which makes it more appealing for an affluent gay couple to live in MH vs LJ? Also as more gays are now openly coupled up, buying a home together with pooled income versus back in the day where they were buying homes on their own? This is just some anecdotal discussions I’ve had with my gay friends.
Just a couple of guesses as to why the premium has widened?
zzzParticipant[quote=jpinpb]
AN – The only thing I can figure is lots of doctors want to be in MH and will spend extra to be there. But frankly, that doesn’t really account for the gap disparity still. All of the things MH has relative to LJ or MM has not changed. All the things that zzz mentioned are the same things that appealed to certain people to live in MH and draw the premium it has. It still does not account for why the gap is greater today. I don’t know what has changed and that’s enough to make me think eventually it will capitulate slowly over time.[/quote]JP, my opinion with no factual or historical context is that MH has evolved quite a bit in the last 20 years. There are more services, more restaurants, bars and also people are becoming more green and the traffic is getting worse. So the ideal of not driving or driving very little is very appealing. People also travel a great deal more.
I also imagine the neighborhood has gotten a bit younger with well to do late 20s, early 30s moving into the neighborhood, which will only attract more young affluent couples.
I don’t know how many openly gay people lived in MH in the 70s or 80s, much less gay couples, but I imagine that number has increased, which makes it more appealing for an affluent gay couple to live in MH vs LJ? Also as more gays are now openly coupled up, buying a home together with pooled income versus back in the day where they were buying homes on their own? This is just some anecdotal discussions I’ve had with my gay friends.
Just a couple of guesses as to why the premium has widened?
zzzParticipant[quote=jpinpb]
AN – The only thing I can figure is lots of doctors want to be in MH and will spend extra to be there. But frankly, that doesn’t really account for the gap disparity still. All of the things MH has relative to LJ or MM has not changed. All the things that zzz mentioned are the same things that appealed to certain people to live in MH and draw the premium it has. It still does not account for why the gap is greater today. I don’t know what has changed and that’s enough to make me think eventually it will capitulate slowly over time.[/quote]JP, my opinion with no factual or historical context is that MH has evolved quite a bit in the last 20 years. There are more services, more restaurants, bars and also people are becoming more green and the traffic is getting worse. So the ideal of not driving or driving very little is very appealing. People also travel a great deal more.
I also imagine the neighborhood has gotten a bit younger with well to do late 20s, early 30s moving into the neighborhood, which will only attract more young affluent couples.
I don’t know how many openly gay people lived in MH in the 70s or 80s, much less gay couples, but I imagine that number has increased, which makes it more appealing for an affluent gay couple to live in MH vs LJ? Also as more gays are now openly coupled up, buying a home together with pooled income versus back in the day where they were buying homes on their own? This is just some anecdotal discussions I’ve had with my gay friends.
Just a couple of guesses as to why the premium has widened?
zzzParticipant[quote=jpinpb]
AN – The only thing I can figure is lots of doctors want to be in MH and will spend extra to be there. But frankly, that doesn’t really account for the gap disparity still. All of the things MH has relative to LJ or MM has not changed. All the things that zzz mentioned are the same things that appealed to certain people to live in MH and draw the premium it has. It still does not account for why the gap is greater today. I don’t know what has changed and that’s enough to make me think eventually it will capitulate slowly over time.[/quote]JP, my opinion with no factual or historical context is that MH has evolved quite a bit in the last 20 years. There are more services, more restaurants, bars and also people are becoming more green and the traffic is getting worse. So the ideal of not driving or driving very little is very appealing. People also travel a great deal more.
I also imagine the neighborhood has gotten a bit younger with well to do late 20s, early 30s moving into the neighborhood, which will only attract more young affluent couples.
I don’t know how many openly gay people lived in MH in the 70s or 80s, much less gay couples, but I imagine that number has increased, which makes it more appealing for an affluent gay couple to live in MH vs LJ? Also as more gays are now openly coupled up, buying a home together with pooled income versus back in the day where they were buying homes on their own? This is just some anecdotal discussions I’ve had with my gay friends.
Just a couple of guesses as to why the premium has widened?
zzzParticipant[quote=CONCHO]Whoah, that house on Upas closed at $819K! I had been watching that one, it was listed in the low 7s. It’s a cool place, the location next to the park is neat. Probably would’ve been $1M+ back in 2007.[/quote]
Concho, I think 819k was a steal
zzzParticipant[quote=CONCHO]Whoah, that house on Upas closed at $819K! I had been watching that one, it was listed in the low 7s. It’s a cool place, the location next to the park is neat. Probably would’ve been $1M+ back in 2007.[/quote]
Concho, I think 819k was a steal
zzzParticipant[quote=CONCHO]Whoah, that house on Upas closed at $819K! I had been watching that one, it was listed in the low 7s. It’s a cool place, the location next to the park is neat. Probably would’ve been $1M+ back in 2007.[/quote]
Concho, I think 819k was a steal
zzzParticipant[quote=CONCHO]Whoah, that house on Upas closed at $819K! I had been watching that one, it was listed in the low 7s. It’s a cool place, the location next to the park is neat. Probably would’ve been $1M+ back in 2007.[/quote]
Concho, I think 819k was a steal
-
AuthorPosts