Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
zk
Participant[quote=NotCranky][quote=zk][quote=Blogstar]I didn’t say that. Even you , biased you , said I only frequently post irrational nonsense.[/quote]
Pull my finger! Quick!![/quote]
LOL.[/quote]
Yeah, my bad. I should’ve known earlier that this is really the only way to deal with an 11-year-old.
It’s ok to be an idiot troll 11-year-old, Blogstar. But when you falsely accuse someone of stalking and forcing, you’re crossing the line into being a genuine douchebag. Probably you’re just too immature to realize that, and if you haven’t figured it out by now, you probably never will. One thing that you do seem to have figured out, though, is that people will stop taking anything you say seriously after you show your true colors. Kudos to you for that.
Participant[quote=Blogstar]I didn’t say that. Even you , biased you , said I only frequently post irrational nonsense.[/quote]
Pull my finger! Quick!!
Participant[quote=Blogstar]It was all well done. Are you the one who thought Blogstar was a serious attempt at a self flattering pseudonym? Maybe that was a different cranky dude.[/quote]
So all your posts on piggington are purposely stupid? You must be so proud.
Participant[quote=Blogstar]Getting repeatedly trolled for repeatedly being an asshole doesn’t make one a sympathetic person who is just trying to save other people from their own embarrassment.
Does that make sense? Or, maybe you took the blue pill and can’t help yourself.[/quote]
I’m not sure if it makes sense or not. You’re saying you’re making a complete fool of yourself by posting irrational nonsense for the purpose of trolling me? I would believe that, and maybe even say, “Well done!” except for the fact that you frequently post the same kind of irrational nonsense when I’m not responding. Just out of curiosity, what’s that for?
Participant[quote=Blogstar]
And enigmas smile.[/quote]I guess just plain not making sense does make one an enigma of sorts.
Participant[quote=Blogstar]I just cut and pasted that from somewhere.[/quote]
Neither humility, nor self critique, nor responsibility for what he posts shall keep Blogstar from his appointed bullshit.
Participant[quote=Blogstar] As someone trained in a scientific field of inquiry, I have always been taught to view humility and self-critique as the highest values, and smug arrogance as the opposite.[/quote]
You may have been taught, but you clearly didn’t learn.
Humility involves taking a look at yourself and admitting your weaknesses and mistakes. When your weaknesses and mistakes are pointed out to you, you make attacks – and not even attacks that have substance, but rather ones that you made up – and then run away.
I see a lot of hypocrisy, but I don’t see any humility nor self critique.
ParticipantGod, what an asshole. And what a bunch of credulous morons lapping up his bullshit.
Participant[quote=Blogstar]I am not going to play these stupid games with you[/quote]
No? You’re just going to post lame, untruthful garbage and then run away when I point out that it’s lame, untruthful garbage?
Very manly.
Participant[quote=Blogstar][quote=zk][quote=Blogstar] feel all smug and genius and vindicated! [/quote]
You could be a reporter for Fox “News.” You see what you want to see and take it as fact when in reality it doesn’t exist.[/quote]
Did I ever mention that I don’t care what you think?
You should have gotten that message when I Ignored you when you tried to stalk me through PM and force me to let you win an argument that you were all fucked up about.[/quote]
Wow. That’s astoundingly pathetic. I was trying to help you avoid making a fool of yourself with that PM. If you can find the argument we were having when I sent you that PM, then you have my permission to post my PM (along with a link to that argument). And then I challenge you to back up your “stalk” and “force” and “fucked up” bullshit.
You won’t, because you can’t.
Participant[quote=Blogstar] feel all smug and genius and vindicated! [/quote]
You could be a reporter for Fox “News.” You see what you want to see and take it as fact when in reality it doesn’t exist.
ParticipantMaybe. And maybe this is why:
http://www.businessinsider.com/hillary-clinton-fbi-trump-2016-11
I’ve been busy (and I still am – the parade is tomorrow) following the World Champion Chicago Cubs around the country and watching them win, and there will be more to follow on the Clinton / FBI subject later. But for now, just this link.
Participant[quote=sdgrrl]Just another recap.
We absolutely love our home. My fiance is a bit of a snob and has was very unrealistic when we were house hunting. He said last night how happy he was and he is not the joyful type lol.
I’m from a small town about an hour outside Houston. I feel a bit like I am in Texas. People really do wave when you drive past. There is the group of retired guys I pass everything morning at 7:20 on the dot doing their team walk around the block.
Hawaii is my favorite place to travel since which isn’t too far away. When I drive down our little windy road each morning, there is a little glimpse of all of the mountains and there is always a little haze on top. For that little moment it feels like I am in Hawaii.
Just wanted to send a quick note.
Thank you all again for your input.[/quote]
What a nice story. So great to hear. Congratulations!!
Participant[quote=bearishgurl]
Also, I understand from friends who are on FB that Gilberthorpe is now in the US and has started the rounds on the US MSM today re: his eyewitness observations 36-37 years ago of Leeds on the plane with Trump. Can’t wait to see one of his taped interviews.Let the truth-tellers begin so these gold-digging, publicity-seeking has-been opportunists can crawl back in their holes with their tails between their legs. As it should be.[/quote]
This article and a little bit of common sense tells you this guy is full of shit.
The fact that trumpers give any credence to what a clown like this says shows their incredible desperation.
But, really, anti-trumpers are doing trumpers a favor by even arguing about it. We’re keeping the attention off of trumps even-more-serious flaws. We should stick to this:
[quote=zk]
In addition to the xenophobia and the misogyny, there are all these shocking and disgusting things:
His wanting nuclear weapons to proliferate.
His insistence that the military will follow illegal orders if he gives them.
His threats not to honor our NATO obligations.
His profound ignorance of foreign affairs (“Putin won’t go into Ukraine,” didn’t know what the nuclear triad is).
His desire to commit war crimes (killing terrorists’ families).
His threats not to pay our debts in full.
His birtherism.
His encouragement of Russian hacking.
His encouragement of violence against protesters and against Clinton.
His constant lying of a type and on a scale not seen in any previous presidential candidate (nor in most humans).
Each of these should cause shock and disgust. Put together, they’re so horrific that to not be shocked and disgusted by them indicates to me willful ignorance (or, more likely, a charade, as I explain in the last paragraph). And they don’t even include smaller reasons, many of them quite large, such as his completely unrealistic deportation force/wall ideas, his fascist tendencies, his claim that America is in a death spiral, his climate change denial, his refusal to release his tax returns, his business failures and his stiffing of thousands of workers, his lack of detailed policies, his draft dodging, his scam “university,” his abuse of his foundation, his desire to police speech, his claim that Obama founded ISIS, his frequently incoherent speech and general lack of intellect and knowledge, his refusal to admit/learn from/apologize for his mistakes, his demagoguery, his desire to decimate the Geneva Convention, and his bullying temperament.
And none of that even includes what is, in my opinion, his biggest, most dangerous flaw:
He can’t take an insult. He attacks anyone who says anything marginally negative about him. How is that going to work? The American president (every American president) is constantly being told his ideas and actions are bad ideas and actions. By citizens, by the news media, by foreign leaders, by other political parties, by people in his own party. By senators, congressmen, governors. Basically by everybody. Donald Trump, if elected president, will have to (because that’s who he is) attack all the people who say bad things about him. How is that going to work? A foreign leader says something negative about a Trump proposal or action. Trump attacks that leader. That leader condemns Trump’s attack. Trump gets angry about that and attacks again. Etc. How is that going to work? How is it going to work to give the nuclear codes to a thin-skinned, ill-tempered, petulant, foolish, ignorant, vindictive, disturbed child?[/quote]I have seen little to no defense of the above. Because there really isn’t any.
-
AuthorPosts
