Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
what_a_disasta
ParticipantApparently it was privatised in the 80’s and has been deteriorating ever since.
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/353/11/1165
I happened to see that new movie “Sicko” by Michael Moore, someone had it up on youtube for a while, but its gone now. You should watch it, I know it made my blood boil.
ParticipantApparently it was privatised in the 80’s and has been deteriorating ever since.
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/353/11/1165
I happened to see that new movie “Sicko” by Michael Moore, someone had it up on youtube for a while, but its gone now. You should watch it, I know it made my blood boil.
ParticipantThey would have paid over 120k in interest and they mayhave got back 30% of that – 36k. At least 1500 a month in tax, mello roos, hoa , maintenance & insurace – 72k. So the profit would be around 90k. The renter spent 120k on rent and saved about 80k (a net 40k loss). So its about a 130k spread.
Looks like people who bought in 03 are sitty pretty by all accounts. However, the almost identical house down the street sold for about 80k less than this one. So maybe there was a cash back on this deal.
ParticipantThey would have paid over 120k in interest and they mayhave got back 30% of that – 36k. At least 1500 a month in tax, mello roos, hoa , maintenance & insurace – 72k. So the profit would be around 90k. The renter spent 120k on rent and saved about 80k (a net 40k loss). So its about a 130k spread.
Looks like people who bought in 03 are sitty pretty by all accounts. However, the almost identical house down the street sold for about 80k less than this one. So maybe there was a cash back on this deal.
ParticipantAssuming no cash back at closing, and after transaction costs, interest, tax etc are factored in to calculate total ownership costs, I wonder how they would have faired against someone renting a similar house for 2.5k who invested the 1.5k (they saved by not buying) over the same 4 year period. I would estimate that this home buyer would have been up at least $2.5k a month over that period against the renter.
ParticipantAssuming no cash back at closing, and after transaction costs, interest, tax etc are factored in to calculate total ownership costs, I wonder how they would have faired against someone renting a similar house for 2.5k who invested the 1.5k (they saved by not buying) over the same 4 year period. I would estimate that this home buyer would have been up at least $2.5k a month over that period against the renter.
ParticipantHmm right on the Zestimate! What a coincidence.
What about 11294,11246 etc?
ParticipantHmm right on the Zestimate! What a coincidence.
What about 11294,11246 etc?
Participantshe is the most evil looking disingenuous old witch on the planet.
Participantshe is the most evil looking disingenuous old witch on the planet.
Participant“The law is the law and it’s perfectly legitimate for individuals to shelter their money.”
Actually this is false. There are no legitimate tax shelters/havens when you are a U.S. citizen. Living in CA it’s your worldwide income @ 40 something percent if you make it into the top band. There are ways and means to reduce this, but if you were to be investigated you would probably end up behind bars.
Participant“The law is the law and it’s perfectly legitimate for individuals to shelter their money.”
Actually this is false. There are no legitimate tax shelters/havens when you are a U.S. citizen. Living in CA it’s your worldwide income @ 40 something percent if you make it into the top band. There are ways and means to reduce this, but if you were to be investigated you would probably end up behind bars.
ParticipantChina do not have a socialized medical system. It’s entirely private.
ParticipantChina do not have a socialized medical system. It’s entirely private.
-
AuthorPosts
