Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 2, 2008 at 12:32 PM in reply to: All things being equal, I’d rather buy from an ugly realtor. #265299September 2, 2008 at 12:32 PM in reply to: All things being equal, I’d rather buy from an ugly realtor. #265337
urbanrealtor
ParticipantI only know them from bumping into them. Hard to forget.
September 2, 2008 at 11:35 AM in reply to: Deficit looms for California’s unemployment benefit fund #265010Participant[quote=EconProf]The seeds of today’s problems were planted with the 2001 near-doubling of benefits during the Grey Davis administration. Generous unemployment compensation benefits encourage the unemployed to turn down OK job possibilities and hold out for the perfect job. Many occupations such as farm workers and construction workers game the system by working half or two-thirds of the year, enough to get big benefits during the down months. Their overall annual income including benefits can be remarkably high as a result. [/quote]
Okay, seriously.
If you are an actual professor of economics, you should be able to throw about some clear, quantifiable evidence of this.I agree that there are major farm subsidies that amount to welfare en masse but I had always understood these to be primarily federally-originated. Most of the grunts in the fields don’t file a lot of paperwork of any sort (or have the socials or literacy with which to file).
It is possible to make that case intuitively about construction but bring data.
September 2, 2008 at 11:35 AM in reply to: Deficit looms for California’s unemployment benefit fund #265219Participant[quote=EconProf]The seeds of today’s problems were planted with the 2001 near-doubling of benefits during the Grey Davis administration. Generous unemployment compensation benefits encourage the unemployed to turn down OK job possibilities and hold out for the perfect job. Many occupations such as farm workers and construction workers game the system by working half or two-thirds of the year, enough to get big benefits during the down months. Their overall annual income including benefits can be remarkably high as a result. [/quote]
Okay, seriously.
If you are an actual professor of economics, you should be able to throw about some clear, quantifiable evidence of this.I agree that there are major farm subsidies that amount to welfare en masse but I had always understood these to be primarily federally-originated. Most of the grunts in the fields don’t file a lot of paperwork of any sort (or have the socials or literacy with which to file).
It is possible to make that case intuitively about construction but bring data.
September 2, 2008 at 11:35 AM in reply to: Deficit looms for California’s unemployment benefit fund #265224Participant[quote=EconProf]The seeds of today’s problems were planted with the 2001 near-doubling of benefits during the Grey Davis administration. Generous unemployment compensation benefits encourage the unemployed to turn down OK job possibilities and hold out for the perfect job. Many occupations such as farm workers and construction workers game the system by working half or two-thirds of the year, enough to get big benefits during the down months. Their overall annual income including benefits can be remarkably high as a result. [/quote]
Okay, seriously.
If you are an actual professor of economics, you should be able to throw about some clear, quantifiable evidence of this.I agree that there are major farm subsidies that amount to welfare en masse but I had always understood these to be primarily federally-originated. Most of the grunts in the fields don’t file a lot of paperwork of any sort (or have the socials or literacy with which to file).
It is possible to make that case intuitively about construction but bring data.
September 2, 2008 at 11:35 AM in reply to: Deficit looms for California’s unemployment benefit fund #265279Participant[quote=EconProf]The seeds of today’s problems were planted with the 2001 near-doubling of benefits during the Grey Davis administration. Generous unemployment compensation benefits encourage the unemployed to turn down OK job possibilities and hold out for the perfect job. Many occupations such as farm workers and construction workers game the system by working half or two-thirds of the year, enough to get big benefits during the down months. Their overall annual income including benefits can be remarkably high as a result. [/quote]
Okay, seriously.
If you are an actual professor of economics, you should be able to throw about some clear, quantifiable evidence of this.I agree that there are major farm subsidies that amount to welfare en masse but I had always understood these to be primarily federally-originated. Most of the grunts in the fields don’t file a lot of paperwork of any sort (or have the socials or literacy with which to file).
It is possible to make that case intuitively about construction but bring data.
September 2, 2008 at 11:35 AM in reply to: Deficit looms for California’s unemployment benefit fund #265319Participant[quote=EconProf]The seeds of today’s problems were planted with the 2001 near-doubling of benefits during the Grey Davis administration. Generous unemployment compensation benefits encourage the unemployed to turn down OK job possibilities and hold out for the perfect job. Many occupations such as farm workers and construction workers game the system by working half or two-thirds of the year, enough to get big benefits during the down months. Their overall annual income including benefits can be remarkably high as a result. [/quote]
Okay, seriously.
If you are an actual professor of economics, you should be able to throw about some clear, quantifiable evidence of this.I agree that there are major farm subsidies that amount to welfare en masse but I had always understood these to be primarily federally-originated. Most of the grunts in the fields don’t file a lot of paperwork of any sort (or have the socials or literacy with which to file).
It is possible to make that case intuitively about construction but bring data.
ParticipantI adore myself regularly.
Is there some way we can turn this thread into a discussion about sharks?
ParticipantI adore myself regularly.
Is there some way we can turn this thread into a discussion about sharks?
ParticipantI adore myself regularly.
Is there some way we can turn this thread into a discussion about sharks?
ParticipantI adore myself regularly.
Is there some way we can turn this thread into a discussion about sharks?
ParticipantI adore myself regularly.
Is there some way we can turn this thread into a discussion about sharks?
ParticipantI just find Casca hilarious.
ParticipantI just find Casca hilarious.
ParticipantI just find Casca hilarious.
-
AuthorPosts
