[urbanrealtor]

JP:
It sounds like you are basically just saying that people who don’t do homework make poor decisions.

But getting back to the specific complaint:
Here is an example. I have a place with a market value of 200-250. If I insist on listing it with a 60 day contract for 400 I am certain I would find some agent dumb enough to list it on those terms.
Further, if I switched agents (staying with these terms) every 60 days for a year, those listings would all be separate. Would it be your preference that agent #6 “inherit” the listing that was originally penned by agent #1?

It seems unfair to make someone a part of an earlier contract. Creating a new contract (which necessitates a new listing entry) seems reasonable here. Would you disagree?

[urbanrealtor]

JP:
It sounds like you are basically just saying that people who don’t do homework make poor decisions.

But getting back to the specific complaint:
Here is an example. I have a place with a market value of 200-250. If I insist on listing it with a 60 day contract for 400 I am certain I would find some agent dumb enough to list it on those terms.
Further, if I switched agents (staying with these terms) every 60 days for a year, those listings would all be separate. Would it be your preference that agent #6 “inherit” the listing that was originally penned by agent #1?

It seems unfair to make someone a part of an earlier contract. Creating a new contract (which necessitates a new listing entry) seems reasonable here. Would you disagree?

[urbanrealtor]

I think that the assertion that Clinton was using extraordinary national security measures on the scale of Bush is about as believable as the assertion that we won (or almost won) Vietnam or perhaps that Castro was more cruel and retrograde than Bautista. And no, I don’t suspect I will convince you.

The difference with Bush is that he sought to instantiate this as formal policy. In other words to expand it into the domain of the rule of law.

Again, to rehash the earlier threadjack: WINE STEALS

This conversation would be far better over pizza and Chateauneuf-Du-Pape. Just sayin’

[urbanrealtor]

I think that the assertion that Clinton was using extraordinary national security measures on the scale of Bush is about as believable as the assertion that we won (or almost won) Vietnam or perhaps that Castro was more cruel and retrograde than Bautista. And no, I don’t suspect I will convince you.

The difference with Bush is that he sought to instantiate this as formal policy. In other words to expand it into the domain of the rule of law.

Again, to rehash the earlier threadjack: WINE STEALS

This conversation would be far better over pizza and Chateauneuf-Du-Pape. Just sayin’

[urbanrealtor]

I think that the assertion that Clinton was using extraordinary national security measures on the scale of Bush is about as believable as the assertion that we won (or almost won) Vietnam or perhaps that Castro was more cruel and retrograde than Bautista. And no, I don’t suspect I will convince you.

The difference with Bush is that he sought to instantiate this as formal policy. In other words to expand it into the domain of the rule of law.

Again, to rehash the earlier threadjack: WINE STEALS

This conversation would be far better over pizza and Chateauneuf-Du-Pape. Just sayin’

[urbanrealtor]

I think that the assertion that Clinton was using extraordinary national security measures on the scale of Bush is about as believable as the assertion that we won (or almost won) Vietnam or perhaps that Castro was more cruel and retrograde than Bautista. And no, I don’t suspect I will convince you.

The difference with Bush is that he sought to instantiate this as formal policy. In other words to expand it into the domain of the rule of law.

Again, to rehash the earlier threadjack: WINE STEALS

This conversation would be far better over pizza and Chateauneuf-Du-Pape. Just sayin’

[urbanrealtor]

I think that the assertion that Clinton was using extraordinary national security measures on the scale of Bush is about as believable as the assertion that we won (or almost won) Vietnam or perhaps that Castro was more cruel and retrograde than Bautista. And no, I don’t suspect I will convince you.

The difference with Bush is that he sought to instantiate this as formal policy. In other words to expand it into the domain of the rule of law.

Again, to rehash the earlier threadjack: WINE STEALS

This conversation would be far better over pizza and Chateauneuf-Du-Pape. Just sayin’

[urbanrealtor]

Regarding MP:
The most extreme liquidation seemed to be in their mapped but non-rehabbed places a few years ago.

Basically just people buying beat up apartments.

I still occasionally see one of their full conversion projects where they have 2 units at 70% of market and the rest at 120%.

They seem like they are still kicking.

Regarding Balboa Ridge and Capri:

I really think that the units selling for less than 250K would undermine any developer assertion of over 300k.

I would offer at (or 10% below) the lowest current listed price or lowest closed price in the last 6 months.

[urbanrealtor]

Regarding MP:
The most extreme liquidation seemed to be in their mapped but non-rehabbed places a few years ago.

Basically just people buying beat up apartments.

I still occasionally see one of their full conversion projects where they have 2 units at 70% of market and the rest at 120%.

They seem like they are still kicking.

Regarding Balboa Ridge and Capri:

I really think that the units selling for less than 250K would undermine any developer assertion of over 300k.

I would offer at (or 10% below) the lowest current listed price or lowest closed price in the last 6 months.

[urbanrealtor]

Regarding MP:
The most extreme liquidation seemed to be in their mapped but non-rehabbed places a few years ago.

Basically just people buying beat up apartments.

I still occasionally see one of their full conversion projects where they have 2 units at 70% of market and the rest at 120%.

They seem like they are still kicking.

Regarding Balboa Ridge and Capri:

I really think that the units selling for less than 250K would undermine any developer assertion of over 300k.

I would offer at (or 10% below) the lowest current listed price or lowest closed price in the last 6 months.

[urbanrealtor]

Regarding MP:
The most extreme liquidation seemed to be in their mapped but non-rehabbed places a few years ago.

Basically just people buying beat up apartments.

I still occasionally see one of their full conversion projects where they have 2 units at 70% of market and the rest at 120%.

They seem like they are still kicking.

Regarding Balboa Ridge and Capri:

I really think that the units selling for less than 250K would undermine any developer assertion of over 300k.

I would offer at (or 10% below) the lowest current listed price or lowest closed price in the last 6 months.

[urbanrealtor]

Regarding MP:
The most extreme liquidation seemed to be in their mapped but non-rehabbed places a few years ago.

Basically just people buying beat up apartments.

I still occasionally see one of their full conversion projects where they have 2 units at 70% of market and the rest at 120%.

They seem like they are still kicking.

Regarding Balboa Ridge and Capri:

I really think that the units selling for less than 250K would undermine any developer assertion of over 300k.

I would offer at (or 10% below) the lowest current listed price or lowest closed price in the last 6 months.

[urbanrealtor]

JP:
What do you see as being the net negative effect upon those who are fooled?

[urbanrealtor]

JP:
What do you see as being the net negative effect upon those who are fooled?

[urbanrealtor]

JP:
What do you see as being the net negative effect upon those who are fooled?

[Author]

Posts