Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
urbanrealtor
ParticipantOkay.
I looked it up and yes, your use is well done.
It is consonant with both how you said it and how I vaguely remember my grandfather using it.For those not grasping our esoteric weirdness:
Fenian is essentially militant Irish nationalism.
This is distinct from being Irish or from (Irish) Republicanism.
Essentially how Zionism is distinct from Jewish nationalism which is also different from being Jewish.
I am not a Fenian.
The below image, which I saw while in Belfast, is a good example of why. It is an Orange (British loyalist) mural but I think it gets the sentiment of the city across. http://people.ku.edu/~kconrad/smural2.jpgA good thing to remember is that the nobody kills more Green Irish than the Sinn Fein and IRA.
Not the Orange Irish and not even the British.
But Allan, yes, I would still love to have my own highschool insurgent cell.
urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]What about “Red Dawn”? I remember laughing my ass off at that movie (I was in the Army at the time) and some foaming at the mouth redneck yelling that it could happen. Uh, okay.[/quote]
Phuk yew Allan.
That was the greatest movie I ever saw prior to the age of 10.I was always certain I would end up as that dead kid hanging out of the window at the beginning.
Meanwhile, you would be that dude in the re-education camp.
WOLVERINES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]What about “Red Dawn”? I remember laughing my ass off at that movie (I was in the Army at the time) and some foaming at the mouth redneck yelling that it could happen. Uh, okay.[/quote]
Phuk yew Allan.
That was the greatest movie I ever saw prior to the age of 10.I was always certain I would end up as that dead kid hanging out of the window at the beginning.
Meanwhile, you would be that dude in the re-education camp.
WOLVERINES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]What about “Red Dawn”? I remember laughing my ass off at that movie (I was in the Army at the time) and some foaming at the mouth redneck yelling that it could happen. Uh, okay.[/quote]
Phuk yew Allan.
That was the greatest movie I ever saw prior to the age of 10.I was always certain I would end up as that dead kid hanging out of the window at the beginning.
Meanwhile, you would be that dude in the re-education camp.
WOLVERINES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]What about “Red Dawn”? I remember laughing my ass off at that movie (I was in the Army at the time) and some foaming at the mouth redneck yelling that it could happen. Uh, okay.[/quote]
Phuk yew Allan.
That was the greatest movie I ever saw prior to the age of 10.I was always certain I would end up as that dead kid hanging out of the window at the beginning.
Meanwhile, you would be that dude in the re-education camp.
WOLVERINES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]What about “Red Dawn”? I remember laughing my ass off at that movie (I was in the Army at the time) and some foaming at the mouth redneck yelling that it could happen. Uh, okay.[/quote]
Phuk yew Allan.
That was the greatest movie I ever saw prior to the age of 10.I was always certain I would end up as that dead kid hanging out of the window at the beginning.
Meanwhile, you would be that dude in the re-education camp.
WOLVERINES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=qwerty007]The House of Lords is severely restricted in it’s ability to veto bills from the Commons, which is probably due to the strong conservative and therefore non-representative element residing within it. However, it now comprises mostly appointed members who are life peers, such as Lady Margaret Thatcher, as opposed to hereditary, which include some of the old British Aristocracy names with fancy titles like Viscount. The difference is that a life peer loses their title when they die, and is not inherited by offspring. But the Lords are not completely powerless as they can and do introduce bills, though not as many as the Commons. I guess their primary role is as a debating forum, and checks and balances for legislation.[/quote]
I would totally be a kick ass member of the HOL.First step: Arm the strong members and cull the rest.
Any suggestions for a next step?
urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=qwerty007]The House of Lords is severely restricted in it’s ability to veto bills from the Commons, which is probably due to the strong conservative and therefore non-representative element residing within it. However, it now comprises mostly appointed members who are life peers, such as Lady Margaret Thatcher, as opposed to hereditary, which include some of the old British Aristocracy names with fancy titles like Viscount. The difference is that a life peer loses their title when they die, and is not inherited by offspring. But the Lords are not completely powerless as they can and do introduce bills, though not as many as the Commons. I guess their primary role is as a debating forum, and checks and balances for legislation.[/quote]
I would totally be a kick ass member of the HOL.First step: Arm the strong members and cull the rest.
Any suggestions for a next step?
urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=qwerty007]The House of Lords is severely restricted in it’s ability to veto bills from the Commons, which is probably due to the strong conservative and therefore non-representative element residing within it. However, it now comprises mostly appointed members who are life peers, such as Lady Margaret Thatcher, as opposed to hereditary, which include some of the old British Aristocracy names with fancy titles like Viscount. The difference is that a life peer loses their title when they die, and is not inherited by offspring. But the Lords are not completely powerless as they can and do introduce bills, though not as many as the Commons. I guess their primary role is as a debating forum, and checks and balances for legislation.[/quote]
I would totally be a kick ass member of the HOL.First step: Arm the strong members and cull the rest.
Any suggestions for a next step?
urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=qwerty007]The House of Lords is severely restricted in it’s ability to veto bills from the Commons, which is probably due to the strong conservative and therefore non-representative element residing within it. However, it now comprises mostly appointed members who are life peers, such as Lady Margaret Thatcher, as opposed to hereditary, which include some of the old British Aristocracy names with fancy titles like Viscount. The difference is that a life peer loses their title when they die, and is not inherited by offspring. But the Lords are not completely powerless as they can and do introduce bills, though not as many as the Commons. I guess their primary role is as a debating forum, and checks and balances for legislation.[/quote]
I would totally be a kick ass member of the HOL.First step: Arm the strong members and cull the rest.
Any suggestions for a next step?
urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=qwerty007]The House of Lords is severely restricted in it’s ability to veto bills from the Commons, which is probably due to the strong conservative and therefore non-representative element residing within it. However, it now comprises mostly appointed members who are life peers, such as Lady Margaret Thatcher, as opposed to hereditary, which include some of the old British Aristocracy names with fancy titles like Viscount. The difference is that a life peer loses their title when they die, and is not inherited by offspring. But the Lords are not completely powerless as they can and do introduce bills, though not as many as the Commons. I guess their primary role is as a debating forum, and checks and balances for legislation.[/quote]
I would totally be a kick ass member of the HOL.First step: Arm the strong members and cull the rest.
Any suggestions for a next step?
March 26, 2009 at 12:08 AM in reply to: How do lenders deal with houses with un-permitted additions #373178urbanrealtor
ParticipantI basically am of the same inclination of HLS (which is rare).
Essentially, the appraisal is the only time the bank actually has anybody look at the place.
In my experience, it is best to have a conversation with my preferred appraiser first.But as Sheldon said, the industry is changing soon.
Therefore, I soon won’t have a preferred appraiser much longer.
March 26, 2009 at 12:08 AM in reply to: How do lenders deal with houses with un-permitted additions #373459urbanrealtor
ParticipantI basically am of the same inclination of HLS (which is rare).
Essentially, the appraisal is the only time the bank actually has anybody look at the place.
In my experience, it is best to have a conversation with my preferred appraiser first.But as Sheldon said, the industry is changing soon.
Therefore, I soon won’t have a preferred appraiser much longer.
March 26, 2009 at 12:08 AM in reply to: How do lenders deal with houses with un-permitted additions #373632urbanrealtor
ParticipantI basically am of the same inclination of HLS (which is rare).
Essentially, the appraisal is the only time the bank actually has anybody look at the place.
In my experience, it is best to have a conversation with my preferred appraiser first.But as Sheldon said, the industry is changing soon.
Therefore, I soon won’t have a preferred appraiser much longer.
-
AuthorPosts
