[urbanrealtor]

Parra building consultants.
619-232-1100

Notorious for kicking inspectors who were too profit-driven out of the associations.

Be careful.

There are a lot of inspectors who also do the work.

Thats a conflict of interest.

They show up offer a “free” inspection.
Find mold and charge you for the work.

[urbanrealtor]

Parra building consultants.
619-232-1100

Notorious for kicking inspectors who were too profit-driven out of the associations.

Be careful.

There are a lot of inspectors who also do the work.

Thats a conflict of interest.

They show up offer a “free” inspection.
Find mold and charge you for the work.

[urbanrealtor]

CAR:
While I find it kind of funny and ironic how you misuse terms and numbers to claim that you are “revealing fraud” or teaching us “reality” or “logic”, its really that I find it more humorous than enlightening.

Even when discussing your numbers of incarcerated offenders, the majority is non-black.

Hispanicism is not a race.

Its an ethnicity.

That is why Charlie Sheen is both white and hispanic (as am I).

You make this big argument that we need talk about this like adults and then you make these facile points about demographics.

Its not that I disagree its just that they are useless in everyday life.

You are right in that most white people who fear black people do not go through the whole chain of who owned who.
Most white people who fear blacks (I am guessing you are one)just think “black = bad”.
Then they try to dress it up with either some tortured chain of logic (like I put out) or some study about how 1 in 33 black men is in prison (like you did).
Either way its the same thing.
Its people using physical characteristics to impute social behavior.
The world does not actually work that way.
Evaluation for specific situations needs to focus on specific issues.
Its just as non-valid to deny a black tenant using your logic as it is to deny black patrons.
If you are screening tenants, you need to stick to what is important.
A rental applicant with a good rental history and solid credit is a better than one who is not.
Their national or racial religious background is not a good indicator.
What you are really arguing against here, CAR, is civil rights.
If one uses really broad studies of race or ethnic origin as a guide there is always some way to rationalize discrimination.
There were real problems with banking in pre-holocaust Germany.
There were real jobs shortages in some US cities prior to the Chinese Exclusion Act.
There are major gang issues now along the US-Mexican border.
Some argue that justifies ethnic-driven law enforcement.
This isn’t a new thing.

Here is one of my favorite cartoons on the subject.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:The_only_one_barred_out_cph.3b48680.jpg

[urbanrealtor]

CAR:
While I find it kind of funny and ironic how you misuse terms and numbers to claim that you are “revealing fraud” or teaching us “reality” or “logic”, its really that I find it more humorous than enlightening.

Even when discussing your numbers of incarcerated offenders, the majority is non-black.

Hispanicism is not a race.

Its an ethnicity.

That is why Charlie Sheen is both white and hispanic (as am I).

You make this big argument that we need talk about this like adults and then you make these facile points about demographics.

Its not that I disagree its just that they are useless in everyday life.

You are right in that most white people who fear black people do not go through the whole chain of who owned who.
Most white people who fear blacks (I am guessing you are one)just think “black = bad”.
Then they try to dress it up with either some tortured chain of logic (like I put out) or some study about how 1 in 33 black men is in prison (like you did).
Either way its the same thing.
Its people using physical characteristics to impute social behavior.
The world does not actually work that way.
Evaluation for specific situations needs to focus on specific issues.
Its just as non-valid to deny a black tenant using your logic as it is to deny black patrons.
If you are screening tenants, you need to stick to what is important.
A rental applicant with a good rental history and solid credit is a better than one who is not.
Their national or racial religious background is not a good indicator.
What you are really arguing against here, CAR, is civil rights.
If one uses really broad studies of race or ethnic origin as a guide there is always some way to rationalize discrimination.
There were real problems with banking in pre-holocaust Germany.
There were real jobs shortages in some US cities prior to the Chinese Exclusion Act.
There are major gang issues now along the US-Mexican border.
Some argue that justifies ethnic-driven law enforcement.
This isn’t a new thing.

Here is one of my favorite cartoons on the subject.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:The_only_one_barred_out_cph.3b48680.jpg

[urbanrealtor]

CAR:
While I find it kind of funny and ironic how you misuse terms and numbers to claim that you are “revealing fraud” or teaching us “reality” or “logic”, its really that I find it more humorous than enlightening.

Even when discussing your numbers of incarcerated offenders, the majority is non-black.

Hispanicism is not a race.

Its an ethnicity.

That is why Charlie Sheen is both white and hispanic (as am I).

You make this big argument that we need talk about this like adults and then you make these facile points about demographics.

Its not that I disagree its just that they are useless in everyday life.

You are right in that most white people who fear black people do not go through the whole chain of who owned who.
Most white people who fear blacks (I am guessing you are one)just think “black = bad”.
Then they try to dress it up with either some tortured chain of logic (like I put out) or some study about how 1 in 33 black men is in prison (like you did).
Either way its the same thing.
Its people using physical characteristics to impute social behavior.
The world does not actually work that way.
Evaluation for specific situations needs to focus on specific issues.
Its just as non-valid to deny a black tenant using your logic as it is to deny black patrons.
If you are screening tenants, you need to stick to what is important.
A rental applicant with a good rental history and solid credit is a better than one who is not.
Their national or racial religious background is not a good indicator.
What you are really arguing against here, CAR, is civil rights.
If one uses really broad studies of race or ethnic origin as a guide there is always some way to rationalize discrimination.
There were real problems with banking in pre-holocaust Germany.
There were real jobs shortages in some US cities prior to the Chinese Exclusion Act.
There are major gang issues now along the US-Mexican border.
Some argue that justifies ethnic-driven law enforcement.
This isn’t a new thing.

Here is one of my favorite cartoons on the subject.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:The_only_one_barred_out_cph.3b48680.jpg

[urbanrealtor]

CAR:
While I find it kind of funny and ironic how you misuse terms and numbers to claim that you are “revealing fraud” or teaching us “reality” or “logic”, its really that I find it more humorous than enlightening.

Even when discussing your numbers of incarcerated offenders, the majority is non-black.

Hispanicism is not a race.

Its an ethnicity.

That is why Charlie Sheen is both white and hispanic (as am I).

You make this big argument that we need talk about this like adults and then you make these facile points about demographics.

Its not that I disagree its just that they are useless in everyday life.

You are right in that most white people who fear black people do not go through the whole chain of who owned who.
Most white people who fear blacks (I am guessing you are one)just think “black = bad”.
Then they try to dress it up with either some tortured chain of logic (like I put out) or some study about how 1 in 33 black men is in prison (like you did).
Either way its the same thing.
Its people using physical characteristics to impute social behavior.
The world does not actually work that way.
Evaluation for specific situations needs to focus on specific issues.
Its just as non-valid to deny a black tenant using your logic as it is to deny black patrons.
If you are screening tenants, you need to stick to what is important.
A rental applicant with a good rental history and solid credit is a better than one who is not.
Their national or racial religious background is not a good indicator.
What you are really arguing against here, CAR, is civil rights.
If one uses really broad studies of race or ethnic origin as a guide there is always some way to rationalize discrimination.
There were real problems with banking in pre-holocaust Germany.
There were real jobs shortages in some US cities prior to the Chinese Exclusion Act.
There are major gang issues now along the US-Mexican border.
Some argue that justifies ethnic-driven law enforcement.
This isn’t a new thing.

Here is one of my favorite cartoons on the subject.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:The_only_one_barred_out_cph.3b48680.jpg

[urbanrealtor]

CAR:
While I find it kind of funny and ironic how you misuse terms and numbers to claim that you are “revealing fraud” or teaching us “reality” or “logic”, its really that I find it more humorous than enlightening.

Even when discussing your numbers of incarcerated offenders, the majority is non-black.

Hispanicism is not a race.

Its an ethnicity.

That is why Charlie Sheen is both white and hispanic (as am I).

You make this big argument that we need talk about this like adults and then you make these facile points about demographics.

Its not that I disagree its just that they are useless in everyday life.

You are right in that most white people who fear black people do not go through the whole chain of who owned who.
Most white people who fear blacks (I am guessing you are one)just think “black = bad”.
Then they try to dress it up with either some tortured chain of logic (like I put out) or some study about how 1 in 33 black men is in prison (like you did).
Either way its the same thing.
Its people using physical characteristics to impute social behavior.
The world does not actually work that way.
Evaluation for specific situations needs to focus on specific issues.
Its just as non-valid to deny a black tenant using your logic as it is to deny black patrons.
If you are screening tenants, you need to stick to what is important.
A rental applicant with a good rental history and solid credit is a better than one who is not.
Their national or racial religious background is not a good indicator.
What you are really arguing against here, CAR, is civil rights.
If one uses really broad studies of race or ethnic origin as a guide there is always some way to rationalize discrimination.
There were real problems with banking in pre-holocaust Germany.
There were real jobs shortages in some US cities prior to the Chinese Exclusion Act.
There are major gang issues now along the US-Mexican border.
Some argue that justifies ethnic-driven law enforcement.
This isn’t a new thing.

Here is one of my favorite cartoons on the subject.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:The_only_one_barred_out_cph.3b48680.jpg

[urbanrealtor]

Most Arabs in San Diego are Christian or non-religious.

[urbanrealtor]

Most Arabs in San Diego are Christian or non-religious.

[urbanrealtor]

Most Arabs in San Diego are Christian or non-religious.

[urbanrealtor]

Most Arabs in San Diego are Christian or non-religious.

[urbanrealtor]

Most Arabs in San Diego are Christian or non-religious.

[urbanrealtor]

California typically has tighter housing controls than the Federal government and most other states with regards to housing.

Here is the page delineating what qualifies as discrimination and what the exceptions are.

http://www.dca.ca.gov/publications/landlordbook/discrimination.shtml

basically there are 2 exceptions:

-Boarders:
If you rent out a single room to a single boarder in an SFR (including attached I think) then you are not subject to antidiscrimination rules.
That does not extend to renting out multiple rooms or to multiple people.
Just for a family renting out one room of their house.

-Roommates:
If you are going to share common areas (kitchens, bathrooms) you can express a gender preference.

There is also senior housing.

[urbanrealtor]

California typically has tighter housing controls than the Federal government and most other states with regards to housing.

Here is the page delineating what qualifies as discrimination and what the exceptions are.

http://www.dca.ca.gov/publications/landlordbook/discrimination.shtml

basically there are 2 exceptions:

-Boarders:
If you rent out a single room to a single boarder in an SFR (including attached I think) then you are not subject to antidiscrimination rules.
That does not extend to renting out multiple rooms or to multiple people.
Just for a family renting out one room of their house.

-Roommates:
If you are going to share common areas (kitchens, bathrooms) you can express a gender preference.

There is also senior housing.

[urbanrealtor]

California typically has tighter housing controls than the Federal government and most other states with regards to housing.

Here is the page delineating what qualifies as discrimination and what the exceptions are.

http://www.dca.ca.gov/publications/landlordbook/discrimination.shtml

basically there are 2 exceptions:

-Boarders:
If you rent out a single room to a single boarder in an SFR (including attached I think) then you are not subject to antidiscrimination rules.
That does not extend to renting out multiple rooms or to multiple people.
Just for a family renting out one room of their house.

-Roommates:
If you are going to share common areas (kitchens, bathrooms) you can express a gender preference.

There is also senior housing.

[Author]

Posts