Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
ucodegen
ParticipantI can see that girl turn into a 200-pound woman. 20 years from now, she’ll be on Oprah (or whoever at that time) telling us about her food ordeal.
Either that or she will turn into a 70lb woman with anorexia nervosa – which is an eating disorder, often caused by excessive control on what a person eats and how much they weigh.
ucodegen
ParticipantI can see that girl turn into a 200-pound woman. 20 years from now, she’ll be on Oprah (or whoever at that time) telling us about her food ordeal.
Either that or she will turn into a 70lb woman with anorexia nervosa – which is an eating disorder, often caused by excessive control on what a person eats and how much they weigh.
ucodegen
ParticipantDouble check those orders you are hoping got made during the crash…. Looks like they are now talking about cancelling trades that happened during the worst of the crash.
And they consider themselves sophisticated investors.. I don’t get to ‘unwind’ a bad trade, or a bad decision on the market. Neither should they.
ucodegen
ParticipantDouble check those orders you are hoping got made during the crash…. Looks like they are now talking about cancelling trades that happened during the worst of the crash.
And they consider themselves sophisticated investors.. I don’t get to ‘unwind’ a bad trade, or a bad decision on the market. Neither should they.
ucodegen
ParticipantDouble check those orders you are hoping got made during the crash…. Looks like they are now talking about cancelling trades that happened during the worst of the crash.
And they consider themselves sophisticated investors.. I don’t get to ‘unwind’ a bad trade, or a bad decision on the market. Neither should they.
ucodegen
ParticipantDouble check those orders you are hoping got made during the crash…. Looks like they are now talking about cancelling trades that happened during the worst of the crash.
And they consider themselves sophisticated investors.. I don’t get to ‘unwind’ a bad trade, or a bad decision on the market. Neither should they.
ucodegen
ParticipantDouble check those orders you are hoping got made during the crash…. Looks like they are now talking about cancelling trades that happened during the worst of the crash.
And they consider themselves sophisticated investors.. I don’t get to ‘unwind’ a bad trade, or a bad decision on the market. Neither should they.
ucodegen
Participant@Jim Jones;
ucodegen
Participant@Jim Jones;
ucodegen
Participant@Jim Jones;
ucodegen
Participant@Jim Jones;
ucodegen
Participant@Jim Jones;
ucodegen
ParticipantFull disclosure: I don’t believe the “fat finger” cover story for today’s stock market panic. That was obviously floated to con the public, is absurd on its face, and doesn’t account for the snap back at 1000 down or stress leading up to the event in other financial markets.
I agree with you there. One fat finger won’t take down multiple stocks simultaneously. It could be someone attacking trailing stops on stocks in order to cause a ‘cascade’. This is done by looking at all the listed trailing stops.. and if there enough, placing a buy order to cover, several places below the trailing stops and then shorting hard to drive down the stock and trigger the stops to cause further stock sales.
It could also have been ‘automated’ transactions.. but any investment firm that puts all their triggers at the same relative price, could be setting themselves up for a loss. The only way they could profit is by ‘convincing’ someone else to part with their stocks at yet a lower price.
ucodegen
ParticipantFull disclosure: I don’t believe the “fat finger” cover story for today’s stock market panic. That was obviously floated to con the public, is absurd on its face, and doesn’t account for the snap back at 1000 down or stress leading up to the event in other financial markets.
I agree with you there. One fat finger won’t take down multiple stocks simultaneously. It could be someone attacking trailing stops on stocks in order to cause a ‘cascade’. This is done by looking at all the listed trailing stops.. and if there enough, placing a buy order to cover, several places below the trailing stops and then shorting hard to drive down the stock and trigger the stops to cause further stock sales.
It could also have been ‘automated’ transactions.. but any investment firm that puts all their triggers at the same relative price, could be setting themselves up for a loss. The only way they could profit is by ‘convincing’ someone else to part with their stocks at yet a lower price.
-
AuthorPosts
