[ucodegen]

[quote investor]

Further, you had professionals like SK (CPA) and Davelj (banking and finance) weighing in and offering excellent insights on the subject and you’re retorting with Wiki entries and an added dollop of Griffin.

I didn’t bring up credentials first. SV from CV and Allen from Fallbrook did, as I have said.
[/quote]
Umm.. you are smoking something. You can’t claim it was offered up by davelj and SK.. it was not a ‘self-claim’, and as previously posted, it was relevant.. and not a ‘sword fight’.

Here is davelj’s statement
[quote davelj]
I have NEVER brought it up out of the blue because, frankly, I think it detracts from the conversation and, as I’ve noted, I think degrees are over-rated. Consequently, it is largely irrelevant. You, on the other hand, clearly believe the opposite, which is why you brought it up in the first place.
[/quote]
so was your quote in reply about bringing up degrees addressed to davelj or to Allan from Fallbrook who actually made the statements?

[ucodegen]

[quote investor]

Further, you had professionals like SK (CPA) and Davelj (banking and finance) weighing in and offering excellent insights on the subject and you’re retorting with Wiki entries and an added dollop of Griffin.

I didn’t bring up credentials first. SV from CV and Allen from Fallbrook did, as I have said.
[/quote]
Umm.. you are smoking something. You can’t claim it was offered up by davelj and SK.. it was not a ‘self-claim’, and as previously posted, it was relevant.. and not a ‘sword fight’.

Here is davelj’s statement
[quote davelj]
I have NEVER brought it up out of the blue because, frankly, I think it detracts from the conversation and, as I’ve noted, I think degrees are over-rated. Consequently, it is largely irrelevant. You, on the other hand, clearly believe the opposite, which is why you brought it up in the first place.
[/quote]
so was your quote in reply about bringing up degrees addressed to davelj or to Allan from Fallbrook who actually made the statements?

[ucodegen]

[quote investor]

Further, you had professionals like SK (CPA) and Davelj (banking and finance) weighing in and offering excellent insights on the subject and you’re retorting with Wiki entries and an added dollop of Griffin.

I didn’t bring up credentials first. SV from CV and Allen from Fallbrook did, as I have said.
[/quote]
Umm.. you are smoking something. You can’t claim it was offered up by davelj and SK.. it was not a ‘self-claim’, and as previously posted, it was relevant.. and not a ‘sword fight’.

Here is davelj’s statement
[quote davelj]
I have NEVER brought it up out of the blue because, frankly, I think it detracts from the conversation and, as I’ve noted, I think degrees are over-rated. Consequently, it is largely irrelevant. You, on the other hand, clearly believe the opposite, which is why you brought it up in the first place.
[/quote]
so was your quote in reply about bringing up degrees addressed to davelj or to Allan from Fallbrook who actually made the statements?

[ucodegen]

[quote investor]
I don’t know how to highlight parts of quotes so that is why it reads like a run on sentence. But, is that the only response you have to the topic? You point out typos as intelligent responses?
[/quote]
Try selecting portions you are addressing and pasting them instead of the entire page.

[ucodegen]

[quote investor]
I don’t know how to highlight parts of quotes so that is why it reads like a run on sentence. But, is that the only response you have to the topic? You point out typos as intelligent responses?
[/quote]
Try selecting portions you are addressing and pasting them instead of the entire page.

[ucodegen]

[quote investor]
I don’t know how to highlight parts of quotes so that is why it reads like a run on sentence. But, is that the only response you have to the topic? You point out typos as intelligent responses?
[/quote]
Try selecting portions you are addressing and pasting them instead of the entire page.

[ucodegen]

[quote investor]
I don’t know how to highlight parts of quotes so that is why it reads like a run on sentence. But, is that the only response you have to the topic? You point out typos as intelligent responses?
[/quote]
Try selecting portions you are addressing and pasting them instead of the entire page.

[ucodegen]

[quote investor]
I don’t know how to highlight parts of quotes so that is why it reads like a run on sentence. But, is that the only response you have to the topic? You point out typos as intelligent responses?
[/quote]
Try selecting portions you are addressing and pasting them instead of the entire page.

[ucodegen]

[quote investor]
I am running between people to see. As I have said, go ahead and shoot me for typo’s. Do you have nothing more relevant than that to contribute? (I think that I am doing pretty well considering the pace I am having to do in order to keep up the discussion).
[/quote]
Someone with a good education doesn’t need to proof read stuff that is as simple as this. The difference stood out as I read it, and I wouldn’t have typed it.

Also I have noticed that most of your posting is reposting the previous post you are replying to in bulk without addressing points and then re-blasting your statement. In fact, you have even done a post where you captured the page with other people’s quotes and formatting marks (a bit indiscriminately). Linky
Skim through it and you’ll see.

If you start addressing posts in a point by point lucid manner, I would give you credit with ‘keeping up the pace’. It is not the case so far.

[ucodegen]

[quote investor]
I am running between people to see. As I have said, go ahead and shoot me for typo’s. Do you have nothing more relevant than that to contribute? (I think that I am doing pretty well considering the pace I am having to do in order to keep up the discussion).
[/quote]
Someone with a good education doesn’t need to proof read stuff that is as simple as this. The difference stood out as I read it, and I wouldn’t have typed it.

Also I have noticed that most of your posting is reposting the previous post you are replying to in bulk without addressing points and then re-blasting your statement. In fact, you have even done a post where you captured the page with other people’s quotes and formatting marks (a bit indiscriminately). Linky
Skim through it and you’ll see.

If you start addressing posts in a point by point lucid manner, I would give you credit with ‘keeping up the pace’. It is not the case so far.

[ucodegen]

[quote investor]
I am running between people to see. As I have said, go ahead and shoot me for typo’s. Do you have nothing more relevant than that to contribute? (I think that I am doing pretty well considering the pace I am having to do in order to keep up the discussion).
[/quote]
Someone with a good education doesn’t need to proof read stuff that is as simple as this. The difference stood out as I read it, and I wouldn’t have typed it.

Also I have noticed that most of your posting is reposting the previous post you are replying to in bulk without addressing points and then re-blasting your statement. In fact, you have even done a post where you captured the page with other people’s quotes and formatting marks (a bit indiscriminately). Linky
Skim through it and you’ll see.

If you start addressing posts in a point by point lucid manner, I would give you credit with ‘keeping up the pace’. It is not the case so far.

[ucodegen]

[quote investor]
I am running between people to see. As I have said, go ahead and shoot me for typo’s. Do you have nothing more relevant than that to contribute? (I think that I am doing pretty well considering the pace I am having to do in order to keep up the discussion).
[/quote]
Someone with a good education doesn’t need to proof read stuff that is as simple as this. The difference stood out as I read it, and I wouldn’t have typed it.

Also I have noticed that most of your posting is reposting the previous post you are replying to in bulk without addressing points and then re-blasting your statement. In fact, you have even done a post where you captured the page with other people’s quotes and formatting marks (a bit indiscriminately). Linky
Skim through it and you’ll see.

If you start addressing posts in a point by point lucid manner, I would give you credit with ‘keeping up the pace’. It is not the case so far.

[ucodegen]

[quote investor]
I am running between people to see. As I have said, go ahead and shoot me for typo’s. Do you have nothing more relevant than that to contribute? (I think that I am doing pretty well considering the pace I am having to do in order to keep up the discussion).
[/quote]
Someone with a good education doesn’t need to proof read stuff that is as simple as this. The difference stood out as I read it, and I wouldn’t have typed it.

Also I have noticed that most of your posting is reposting the previous post you are replying to in bulk without addressing points and then re-blasting your statement. In fact, you have even done a post where you captured the page with other people’s quotes and formatting marks (a bit indiscriminately). Linky
Skim through it and you’ll see.

If you start addressing posts in a point by point lucid manner, I would give you credit with ‘keeping up the pace’. It is not the case so far.

[ucodegen]

[quote FormerSanDiegan]
I don’t have time to write a response to this very interesting topic, so this is a post to tell people that I would have a very well-thought out reponse, if only I had the time two do so, but I don’t and I have a PhD too so don’t think I am stupid or something, so if I had more time I would read the 237 word (or so) post further up that has no paragraph breaks and try to decipher something that is debatable in it because surely there is something to it that I could either agree with or disagree with and provide links to supporting third party opinions or facts to back up my position as to whether or not the post has merit.
[/quote]
Aww.. you can join in too… pretty good run-on sentence too.

[ucodegen]

[quote FormerSanDiegan]
I don’t have time to write a response to this very interesting topic, so this is a post to tell people that I would have a very well-thought out reponse, if only I had the time two do so, but I don’t and I have a PhD too so don’t think I am stupid or something, so if I had more time I would read the 237 word (or so) post further up that has no paragraph breaks and try to decipher something that is debatable in it because surely there is something to it that I could either agree with or disagree with and provide links to supporting third party opinions or facts to back up my position as to whether or not the post has merit.
[/quote]
Aww.. you can join in too… pretty good run-on sentence too.

[Author]

Posts