Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
UCGal
Participant[quote=AN]What? MMHS ranked higher than Coronado, Scripps, and RB? Wow, that’s definitely surprising to say the least. The best we can do in SD is Westview @181? That’s pretty sad.[/quote]
Preuss was #10 and one of the 4 schools at SDHS’s campus was #60.
But I was surprised by the rankings also. To see University City HS so close to Torrey Pines HS was a shocker to me.
Participant[quote=AN]What? MMHS ranked higher than Coronado, Scripps, and RB? Wow, that’s definitely surprising to say the least. The best we can do in SD is Westview @181? That’s pretty sad.[/quote]
Preuss was #10 and one of the 4 schools at SDHS’s campus was #60.
But I was surprised by the rankings also. To see University City HS so close to Torrey Pines HS was a shocker to me.
ParticipantOk… People who need mortgage mods are those that have mortgages they contractually committed to, but are now looking for reductions in interest or principal. Why is it considered bad to look at ALL of that persons assets as “fair game” before putting a mod through? If the person had non-retirement savings would that be exempt from consideration? Probably not.
Truthfully, I don’t see why 401ks should be considered as untouchable. Loan mods are a renegotiation of the contract – and there should be a give and take.
Hypothetical example: “Bob” has $500k in 401k. He has a mortgage for $400k. His house is now worth $350k. He’s looking for a loan mod. Why should the bank reduce his payments or principal when he’s got a significant chunk of money sitting there?
ParticipantOk… People who need mortgage mods are those that have mortgages they contractually committed to, but are now looking for reductions in interest or principal. Why is it considered bad to look at ALL of that persons assets as “fair game” before putting a mod through? If the person had non-retirement savings would that be exempt from consideration? Probably not.
Truthfully, I don’t see why 401ks should be considered as untouchable. Loan mods are a renegotiation of the contract – and there should be a give and take.
Hypothetical example: “Bob” has $500k in 401k. He has a mortgage for $400k. His house is now worth $350k. He’s looking for a loan mod. Why should the bank reduce his payments or principal when he’s got a significant chunk of money sitting there?
ParticipantOk… People who need mortgage mods are those that have mortgages they contractually committed to, but are now looking for reductions in interest or principal. Why is it considered bad to look at ALL of that persons assets as “fair game” before putting a mod through? If the person had non-retirement savings would that be exempt from consideration? Probably not.
Truthfully, I don’t see why 401ks should be considered as untouchable. Loan mods are a renegotiation of the contract – and there should be a give and take.
Hypothetical example: “Bob” has $500k in 401k. He has a mortgage for $400k. His house is now worth $350k. He’s looking for a loan mod. Why should the bank reduce his payments or principal when he’s got a significant chunk of money sitting there?
ParticipantOk… People who need mortgage mods are those that have mortgages they contractually committed to, but are now looking for reductions in interest or principal. Why is it considered bad to look at ALL of that persons assets as “fair game” before putting a mod through? If the person had non-retirement savings would that be exempt from consideration? Probably not.
Truthfully, I don’t see why 401ks should be considered as untouchable. Loan mods are a renegotiation of the contract – and there should be a give and take.
Hypothetical example: “Bob” has $500k in 401k. He has a mortgage for $400k. His house is now worth $350k. He’s looking for a loan mod. Why should the bank reduce his payments or principal when he’s got a significant chunk of money sitting there?
ParticipantOk… People who need mortgage mods are those that have mortgages they contractually committed to, but are now looking for reductions in interest or principal. Why is it considered bad to look at ALL of that persons assets as “fair game” before putting a mod through? If the person had non-retirement savings would that be exempt from consideration? Probably not.
Truthfully, I don’t see why 401ks should be considered as untouchable. Loan mods are a renegotiation of the contract – and there should be a give and take.
Hypothetical example: “Bob” has $500k in 401k. He has a mortgage for $400k. His house is now worth $350k. He’s looking for a loan mod. Why should the bank reduce his payments or principal when he’s got a significant chunk of money sitting there?
ParticipantYou get one homeowners exemption. I assume you have it on your main tax bill, not the supplemental.
When we built our companion unit we got a supplemental tax bill. We can’t claim homeowners exemption on that since we’re claiming it on the main tax bill for our property.
ParticipantYou get one homeowners exemption. I assume you have it on your main tax bill, not the supplemental.
When we built our companion unit we got a supplemental tax bill. We can’t claim homeowners exemption on that since we’re claiming it on the main tax bill for our property.
ParticipantYou get one homeowners exemption. I assume you have it on your main tax bill, not the supplemental.
When we built our companion unit we got a supplemental tax bill. We can’t claim homeowners exemption on that since we’re claiming it on the main tax bill for our property.
ParticipantYou get one homeowners exemption. I assume you have it on your main tax bill, not the supplemental.
When we built our companion unit we got a supplemental tax bill. We can’t claim homeowners exemption on that since we’re claiming it on the main tax bill for our property.
ParticipantYou get one homeowners exemption. I assume you have it on your main tax bill, not the supplemental.
When we built our companion unit we got a supplemental tax bill. We can’t claim homeowners exemption on that since we’re claiming it on the main tax bill for our property.
ParticipantRegional numbers just came out today.
CA had a whoppin’ 11.5% unemployment again.http://www.bls.gov/news.release/laus.nr0.htm
San Diego tends to be lower than the state by about a percent.
ParticipantRegional numbers just came out today.
CA had a whoppin’ 11.5% unemployment again.http://www.bls.gov/news.release/laus.nr0.htm
San Diego tends to be lower than the state by about a percent.
-
AuthorPosts
