Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
TheBreeze
Participant[quote=socrattt]
Now do I have to truly point out how ignorant you are once again?? There are plenty of left wingers here bashing Obama as well, so don’t think it is just right wing conservatives.
[/quote]Yes, there are left-wing nutjobs bashing Obama as well. Obama is rightly ignoring both the left-wing nutjobs and the right-wing nutjobs and focusing on the 70% of Americans who are moderates. The ‘moderate 70%’ are very pleased as evidenced by Obama’s 70% approval rating. Incredibly smart politics by Obama.
[quote=socrattt]
I am not going to waste my time pointing everything out to you because your 1 and 2 points can be broken down and shoved down your throat and you wouldn’t see it. You have no clue about GITMO, 45% of this nation is against the closing of GITMO only 35% approve.
[/quote]GITMO will only become an issue if someone released from there is able to launch a successful terrorist attack on the U.S. Otherwise, GITMO will be forgotten by 2012. If neither the U.S. nor U.S. interests are attacked between now and 2012, GITMO, Iraq, and even Afghanistan will likely be non-issues in 2012.
And if Obama is able to break Al Qaeda? You and Allan may be the only two people who vote Republican in 2012.
The Republicans may have to borrow the Army’s motto. But, instead of any army of one, it will be a party of one. LOL!
Participant[quote=socrattt]
Now do I have to truly point out how ignorant you are once again?? There are plenty of left wingers here bashing Obama as well, so don’t think it is just right wing conservatives.
[/quote]Yes, there are left-wing nutjobs bashing Obama as well. Obama is rightly ignoring both the left-wing nutjobs and the right-wing nutjobs and focusing on the 70% of Americans who are moderates. The ‘moderate 70%’ are very pleased as evidenced by Obama’s 70% approval rating. Incredibly smart politics by Obama.
[quote=socrattt]
I am not going to waste my time pointing everything out to you because your 1 and 2 points can be broken down and shoved down your throat and you wouldn’t see it. You have no clue about GITMO, 45% of this nation is against the closing of GITMO only 35% approve.
[/quote]GITMO will only become an issue if someone released from there is able to launch a successful terrorist attack on the U.S. Otherwise, GITMO will be forgotten by 2012. If neither the U.S. nor U.S. interests are attacked between now and 2012, GITMO, Iraq, and even Afghanistan will likely be non-issues in 2012.
And if Obama is able to break Al Qaeda? You and Allan may be the only two people who vote Republican in 2012.
The Republicans may have to borrow the Army’s motto. But, instead of any army of one, it will be a party of one. LOL!
Participant[quote=socrattt]
Now do I have to truly point out how ignorant you are once again?? There are plenty of left wingers here bashing Obama as well, so don’t think it is just right wing conservatives.
[/quote]Yes, there are left-wing nutjobs bashing Obama as well. Obama is rightly ignoring both the left-wing nutjobs and the right-wing nutjobs and focusing on the 70% of Americans who are moderates. The ‘moderate 70%’ are very pleased as evidenced by Obama’s 70% approval rating. Incredibly smart politics by Obama.
[quote=socrattt]
I am not going to waste my time pointing everything out to you because your 1 and 2 points can be broken down and shoved down your throat and you wouldn’t see it. You have no clue about GITMO, 45% of this nation is against the closing of GITMO only 35% approve.
[/quote]GITMO will only become an issue if someone released from there is able to launch a successful terrorist attack on the U.S. Otherwise, GITMO will be forgotten by 2012. If neither the U.S. nor U.S. interests are attacked between now and 2012, GITMO, Iraq, and even Afghanistan will likely be non-issues in 2012.
And if Obama is able to break Al Qaeda? You and Allan may be the only two people who vote Republican in 2012.
The Republicans may have to borrow the Army’s motto. But, instead of any army of one, it will be a party of one. LOL!
Participant[quote=socrattt]
Now do I have to truly point out how ignorant you are once again?? There are plenty of left wingers here bashing Obama as well, so don’t think it is just right wing conservatives.
[/quote]Yes, there are left-wing nutjobs bashing Obama as well. Obama is rightly ignoring both the left-wing nutjobs and the right-wing nutjobs and focusing on the 70% of Americans who are moderates. The ‘moderate 70%’ are very pleased as evidenced by Obama’s 70% approval rating. Incredibly smart politics by Obama.
[quote=socrattt]
I am not going to waste my time pointing everything out to you because your 1 and 2 points can be broken down and shoved down your throat and you wouldn’t see it. You have no clue about GITMO, 45% of this nation is against the closing of GITMO only 35% approve.
[/quote]GITMO will only become an issue if someone released from there is able to launch a successful terrorist attack on the U.S. Otherwise, GITMO will be forgotten by 2012. If neither the U.S. nor U.S. interests are attacked between now and 2012, GITMO, Iraq, and even Afghanistan will likely be non-issues in 2012.
And if Obama is able to break Al Qaeda? You and Allan may be the only two people who vote Republican in 2012.
The Republicans may have to borrow the Army’s motto. But, instead of any army of one, it will be a party of one. LOL!
Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Uh, Breezie, I hate to whiz in your Cheerios, but wasn’t it a right-wing nutjob (Paulson) who authored the document that Obama is using as his template?
[/quote]Are you deaf? This was a quote in my original post:
Officials have been grappling for nearly a year to figure out how to better oversee the financial system, particularly as a number of large and inadequately supervised companies have encountered problems. In a sweeping regulatory blueprint unveiled last March, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson Jr. proposed a broad consolidation of banking and financial agencies, including merging the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. That proposal is not included in the current plans.
It’s right there in black-and-white. Paulson’s proposal is not in Obama’s plan.
My gawd. I realize you right-wing nut jobs are desperate, but I guarantee you that Obama’s fellow citizens are going to see right through the righties attempts to take credit for Obama’s great policy decisions.
I can’t really blame the righties for trying though. Your choices are either (1) try and take credit for Obama’s awesome policies or (2) get behind some nitwit from Alaska who believes the Earth is 5,000 years old. You righties have chosen the best of two bad options.
Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Uh, Breezie, I hate to whiz in your Cheerios, but wasn’t it a right-wing nutjob (Paulson) who authored the document that Obama is using as his template?
[/quote]Are you deaf? This was a quote in my original post:
Officials have been grappling for nearly a year to figure out how to better oversee the financial system, particularly as a number of large and inadequately supervised companies have encountered problems. In a sweeping regulatory blueprint unveiled last March, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson Jr. proposed a broad consolidation of banking and financial agencies, including merging the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. That proposal is not included in the current plans.
It’s right there in black-and-white. Paulson’s proposal is not in Obama’s plan.
My gawd. I realize you right-wing nut jobs are desperate, but I guarantee you that Obama’s fellow citizens are going to see right through the righties attempts to take credit for Obama’s great policy decisions.
I can’t really blame the righties for trying though. Your choices are either (1) try and take credit for Obama’s awesome policies or (2) get behind some nitwit from Alaska who believes the Earth is 5,000 years old. You righties have chosen the best of two bad options.
Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Uh, Breezie, I hate to whiz in your Cheerios, but wasn’t it a right-wing nutjob (Paulson) who authored the document that Obama is using as his template?
[/quote]Are you deaf? This was a quote in my original post:
Officials have been grappling for nearly a year to figure out how to better oversee the financial system, particularly as a number of large and inadequately supervised companies have encountered problems. In a sweeping regulatory blueprint unveiled last March, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson Jr. proposed a broad consolidation of banking and financial agencies, including merging the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. That proposal is not included in the current plans.
It’s right there in black-and-white. Paulson’s proposal is not in Obama’s plan.
My gawd. I realize you right-wing nut jobs are desperate, but I guarantee you that Obama’s fellow citizens are going to see right through the righties attempts to take credit for Obama’s great policy decisions.
I can’t really blame the righties for trying though. Your choices are either (1) try and take credit for Obama’s awesome policies or (2) get behind some nitwit from Alaska who believes the Earth is 5,000 years old. You righties have chosen the best of two bad options.
Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Uh, Breezie, I hate to whiz in your Cheerios, but wasn’t it a right-wing nutjob (Paulson) who authored the document that Obama is using as his template?
[/quote]Are you deaf? This was a quote in my original post:
Officials have been grappling for nearly a year to figure out how to better oversee the financial system, particularly as a number of large and inadequately supervised companies have encountered problems. In a sweeping regulatory blueprint unveiled last March, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson Jr. proposed a broad consolidation of banking and financial agencies, including merging the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. That proposal is not included in the current plans.
It’s right there in black-and-white. Paulson’s proposal is not in Obama’s plan.
My gawd. I realize you right-wing nut jobs are desperate, but I guarantee you that Obama’s fellow citizens are going to see right through the righties attempts to take credit for Obama’s great policy decisions.
I can’t really blame the righties for trying though. Your choices are either (1) try and take credit for Obama’s awesome policies or (2) get behind some nitwit from Alaska who believes the Earth is 5,000 years old. You righties have chosen the best of two bad options.
Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Uh, Breezie, I hate to whiz in your Cheerios, but wasn’t it a right-wing nutjob (Paulson) who authored the document that Obama is using as his template?
[/quote]Are you deaf? This was a quote in my original post:
Officials have been grappling for nearly a year to figure out how to better oversee the financial system, particularly as a number of large and inadequately supervised companies have encountered problems. In a sweeping regulatory blueprint unveiled last March, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson Jr. proposed a broad consolidation of banking and financial agencies, including merging the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. That proposal is not included in the current plans.
It’s right there in black-and-white. Paulson’s proposal is not in Obama’s plan.
My gawd. I realize you right-wing nut jobs are desperate, but I guarantee you that Obama’s fellow citizens are going to see right through the righties attempts to take credit for Obama’s great policy decisions.
I can’t really blame the righties for trying though. Your choices are either (1) try and take credit for Obama’s awesome policies or (2) get behind some nitwit from Alaska who believes the Earth is 5,000 years old. You righties have chosen the best of two bad options.
ParticipantAre these recourse mods? If so, this doesn’t seem too bad. The taxpayers are giving this guy a subsidy on his interest rate, but he didn’t get a principal write-down.
I’m not convinced that these loan mods are going to work long-term, but it’s definitely not the most egregious give-away we’ve seen in this era of the housing bubble.
ParticipantAre these recourse mods? If so, this doesn’t seem too bad. The taxpayers are giving this guy a subsidy on his interest rate, but he didn’t get a principal write-down.
I’m not convinced that these loan mods are going to work long-term, but it’s definitely not the most egregious give-away we’ve seen in this era of the housing bubble.
ParticipantAre these recourse mods? If so, this doesn’t seem too bad. The taxpayers are giving this guy a subsidy on his interest rate, but he didn’t get a principal write-down.
I’m not convinced that these loan mods are going to work long-term, but it’s definitely not the most egregious give-away we’ve seen in this era of the housing bubble.
ParticipantAre these recourse mods? If so, this doesn’t seem too bad. The taxpayers are giving this guy a subsidy on his interest rate, but he didn’t get a principal write-down.
I’m not convinced that these loan mods are going to work long-term, but it’s definitely not the most egregious give-away we’ve seen in this era of the housing bubble.
ParticipantAre these recourse mods? If so, this doesn’t seem too bad. The taxpayers are giving this guy a subsidy on his interest rate, but he didn’t get a principal write-down.
I’m not convinced that these loan mods are going to work long-term, but it’s definitely not the most egregious give-away we’ve seen in this era of the housing bubble.
-
AuthorPosts
