[TheBreeze]

[quote=FormerSanDiegan]

OK. SO it’s not really about “public policy” is it ? It’s about how government policy can help people in the same position as you, which you equate to being in the best interest of the public. I get it. Do you or a spouse work in R&D by chance ?

My civil Engineering buddies think it’s in the public best interest to spend the country’s future tax dollars on bridges and infrastructure. My teacher friend think it’s in the public’s best interest to spend more on educating our children.

I understand where you are coming from.
[/quote]

No, you stupid motherf****er. I said end all housing subsidies. No one gets a subsidy. Let’s have the housing market go back to being straight up capitalist. Stop twisting my words you jackass.

And I said the government grants should go to universities. You can’t see me but rest assured that I’m giving you the finger you Marxist, slumlord-owning piece of crap.

[TheBreeze]

[quote=FormerSanDiegan]

OK. SO it’s not really about “public policy” is it ? It’s about how government policy can help people in the same position as you, which you equate to being in the best interest of the public. I get it. Do you or a spouse work in R&D by chance ?

My civil Engineering buddies think it’s in the public best interest to spend the country’s future tax dollars on bridges and infrastructure. My teacher friend think it’s in the public’s best interest to spend more on educating our children.

I understand where you are coming from.
[/quote]

No, you stupid motherf****er. I said end all housing subsidies. No one gets a subsidy. Let’s have the housing market go back to being straight up capitalist. Stop twisting my words you jackass.

And I said the government grants should go to universities. You can’t see me but rest assured that I’m giving you the finger you Marxist, slumlord-owning piece of crap.

[TheBreeze]

[quote=FormerSanDiegan]

OK. SO it’s not really about “public policy” is it ? It’s about how government policy can help people in the same position as you, which you equate to being in the best interest of the public. I get it. Do you or a spouse work in R&D by chance ?

My civil Engineering buddies think it’s in the public best interest to spend the country’s future tax dollars on bridges and infrastructure. My teacher friend think it’s in the public’s best interest to spend more on educating our children.

I understand where you are coming from.
[/quote]

No, you stupid motherf****er. I said end all housing subsidies. No one gets a subsidy. Let’s have the housing market go back to being straight up capitalist. Stop twisting my words you jackass.

And I said the government grants should go to universities. You can’t see me but rest assured that I’m giving you the finger you Marxist, slumlord-owning piece of crap.

[TheBreeze]

[quote=FormerSanDiegan]

OK. SO it’s not really about “public policy” is it ? It’s about how government policy can help people in the same position as you, which you equate to being in the best interest of the public. I get it. Do you or a spouse work in R&D by chance ?

My civil Engineering buddies think it’s in the public best interest to spend the country’s future tax dollars on bridges and infrastructure. My teacher friend think it’s in the public’s best interest to spend more on educating our children.

I understand where you are coming from.
[/quote]

No, you stupid motherf****er. I said end all housing subsidies. No one gets a subsidy. Let’s have the housing market go back to being straight up capitalist. Stop twisting my words you jackass.

And I said the government grants should go to universities. You can’t see me but rest assured that I’m giving you the finger you Marxist, slumlord-owning piece of crap.

[TheBreeze]

[quote=FormerSanDiegan]

OK. SO it’s not really about “public policy” is it ? It’s about how government policy can help people in the same position as you, which you equate to being in the best interest of the public. I get it. Do you or a spouse work in R&D by chance ?

My civil Engineering buddies think it’s in the public best interest to spend the country’s future tax dollars on bridges and infrastructure. My teacher friend think it’s in the public’s best interest to spend more on educating our children.

I understand where you are coming from.
[/quote]

No, you stupid motherf****er. I said end all housing subsidies. No one gets a subsidy. Let’s have the housing market go back to being straight up capitalist. Stop twisting my words you jackass.

And I said the government grants should go to universities. You can’t see me but rest assured that I’m giving you the finger you Marxist, slumlord-owning piece of crap.

[TheBreeze]

And not only is the government subsidizing housing for rich a-holes, they are allowing banks to keep their REOs off the market. According the Mr. Mortgage, banks are hoarding 2/3rds of their REOs:

Additionally, they also forget about ’shadow inventory’ in the form of REO that is not listed. Realty Trac said in a recent story that they show that only about a third of all REO is listed and trackable as inventory. The rest is sitting rotting at the banks/servicers.

http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/

So now those of us looking to buy a house get screwed two ways: Government subsidies have pushed up the price of housing and the government is allowing banks to keep a large chunk of housing inventory off the market which further drives up housing costs.

F***! F***! F***! I’m tired of getting shafted by the government.

I hope all that shadow REO inventory hits the market soon and breaks all the ‘mom and pops’. You probably see the ‘mom and pops’ as some type of American hero. I just see them as slumlords who are basically equivalent to a welfare queen in my mind as they both suck off the government teat.

I’m surprised to see so many Piggs in favor of all this government housing assistance. I thought most of you guys were in favor of capitalism. Instead, most of you are more socialist than Marx.

[TheBreeze]

And not only is the government subsidizing housing for rich a-holes, they are allowing banks to keep their REOs off the market. According the Mr. Mortgage, banks are hoarding 2/3rds of their REOs:

Additionally, they also forget about ’shadow inventory’ in the form of REO that is not listed. Realty Trac said in a recent story that they show that only about a third of all REO is listed and trackable as inventory. The rest is sitting rotting at the banks/servicers.

http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/

So now those of us looking to buy a house get screwed two ways: Government subsidies have pushed up the price of housing and the government is allowing banks to keep a large chunk of housing inventory off the market which further drives up housing costs.

F***! F***! F***! I’m tired of getting shafted by the government.

I hope all that shadow REO inventory hits the market soon and breaks all the ‘mom and pops’. You probably see the ‘mom and pops’ as some type of American hero. I just see them as slumlords who are basically equivalent to a welfare queen in my mind as they both suck off the government teat.

I’m surprised to see so many Piggs in favor of all this government housing assistance. I thought most of you guys were in favor of capitalism. Instead, most of you are more socialist than Marx.

[TheBreeze]

And not only is the government subsidizing housing for rich a-holes, they are allowing banks to keep their REOs off the market. According the Mr. Mortgage, banks are hoarding 2/3rds of their REOs:

Additionally, they also forget about ’shadow inventory’ in the form of REO that is not listed. Realty Trac said in a recent story that they show that only about a third of all REO is listed and trackable as inventory. The rest is sitting rotting at the banks/servicers.

http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/

So now those of us looking to buy a house get screwed two ways: Government subsidies have pushed up the price of housing and the government is allowing banks to keep a large chunk of housing inventory off the market which further drives up housing costs.

F***! F***! F***! I’m tired of getting shafted by the government.

I hope all that shadow REO inventory hits the market soon and breaks all the ‘mom and pops’. You probably see the ‘mom and pops’ as some type of American hero. I just see them as slumlords who are basically equivalent to a welfare queen in my mind as they both suck off the government teat.

I’m surprised to see so many Piggs in favor of all this government housing assistance. I thought most of you guys were in favor of capitalism. Instead, most of you are more socialist than Marx.

[TheBreeze]

And not only is the government subsidizing housing for rich a-holes, they are allowing banks to keep their REOs off the market. According the Mr. Mortgage, banks are hoarding 2/3rds of their REOs:

Additionally, they also forget about ’shadow inventory’ in the form of REO that is not listed. Realty Trac said in a recent story that they show that only about a third of all REO is listed and trackable as inventory. The rest is sitting rotting at the banks/servicers.

http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/

So now those of us looking to buy a house get screwed two ways: Government subsidies have pushed up the price of housing and the government is allowing banks to keep a large chunk of housing inventory off the market which further drives up housing costs.

F***! F***! F***! I’m tired of getting shafted by the government.

I hope all that shadow REO inventory hits the market soon and breaks all the ‘mom and pops’. You probably see the ‘mom and pops’ as some type of American hero. I just see them as slumlords who are basically equivalent to a welfare queen in my mind as they both suck off the government teat.

I’m surprised to see so many Piggs in favor of all this government housing assistance. I thought most of you guys were in favor of capitalism. Instead, most of you are more socialist than Marx.

[TheBreeze]

And not only is the government subsidizing housing for rich a-holes, they are allowing banks to keep their REOs off the market. According the Mr. Mortgage, banks are hoarding 2/3rds of their REOs:

Additionally, they also forget about ’shadow inventory’ in the form of REO that is not listed. Realty Trac said in a recent story that they show that only about a third of all REO is listed and trackable as inventory. The rest is sitting rotting at the banks/servicers.

http://mrmortgage.ml-implode.com/

So now those of us looking to buy a house get screwed two ways: Government subsidies have pushed up the price of housing and the government is allowing banks to keep a large chunk of housing inventory off the market which further drives up housing costs.

F***! F***! F***! I’m tired of getting shafted by the government.

I hope all that shadow REO inventory hits the market soon and breaks all the ‘mom and pops’. You probably see the ‘mom and pops’ as some type of American hero. I just see them as slumlords who are basically equivalent to a welfare queen in my mind as they both suck off the government teat.

I’m surprised to see so many Piggs in favor of all this government housing assistance. I thought most of you guys were in favor of capitalism. Instead, most of you are more socialist than Marx.

[TheBreeze]

[quote=FormerSanDiegan]

Those who are hindered by this rule are those who buy a second house and rent out their first house as a rental property. These are your typical Mom & Pop landlords. Unlike the corporate-run large box apartment complexes, these are the people who typically rent out single-family homes. These are the folks you rent from that never raise the rent until you leave.

Perhaps you are right, maybe we should not encourage the mom & pops. The better approach is to allow all investment property to end up in the hands of corporate entities. To hell with the little guy.

[/quote]

Oh joy! So instead of being able to buy my own place, I can instead rent from some rich ‘mom and pop’ a-holes who were able to drive up the prices of multiple homes on the backs of government subsidies funded by me and other taxpayers. No thanks. I say end all housing subsidies so that the average person can afford a house again.

BTW, the only people I see raising rents these days are those same ‘mom and pops’ you speak so lovingly of. These are the same f***heads who will charge you a deposit equal to two months’ rent. I’ll stick to the big corporations and not get ripped off. Besides, the big corporations are actually lowering rents.

[TheBreeze]

[quote=FormerSanDiegan]

Those who are hindered by this rule are those who buy a second house and rent out their first house as a rental property. These are your typical Mom & Pop landlords. Unlike the corporate-run large box apartment complexes, these are the people who typically rent out single-family homes. These are the folks you rent from that never raise the rent until you leave.

Perhaps you are right, maybe we should not encourage the mom & pops. The better approach is to allow all investment property to end up in the hands of corporate entities. To hell with the little guy.

[/quote]

Oh joy! So instead of being able to buy my own place, I can instead rent from some rich ‘mom and pop’ a-holes who were able to drive up the prices of multiple homes on the backs of government subsidies funded by me and other taxpayers. No thanks. I say end all housing subsidies so that the average person can afford a house again.

BTW, the only people I see raising rents these days are those same ‘mom and pops’ you speak so lovingly of. These are the same f***heads who will charge you a deposit equal to two months’ rent. I’ll stick to the big corporations and not get ripped off. Besides, the big corporations are actually lowering rents.

[TheBreeze]

[quote=FormerSanDiegan]

Those who are hindered by this rule are those who buy a second house and rent out their first house as a rental property. These are your typical Mom & Pop landlords. Unlike the corporate-run large box apartment complexes, these are the people who typically rent out single-family homes. These are the folks you rent from that never raise the rent until you leave.

Perhaps you are right, maybe we should not encourage the mom & pops. The better approach is to allow all investment property to end up in the hands of corporate entities. To hell with the little guy.

[/quote]

Oh joy! So instead of being able to buy my own place, I can instead rent from some rich ‘mom and pop’ a-holes who were able to drive up the prices of multiple homes on the backs of government subsidies funded by me and other taxpayers. No thanks. I say end all housing subsidies so that the average person can afford a house again.

BTW, the only people I see raising rents these days are those same ‘mom and pops’ you speak so lovingly of. These are the same f***heads who will charge you a deposit equal to two months’ rent. I’ll stick to the big corporations and not get ripped off. Besides, the big corporations are actually lowering rents.

[TheBreeze]

[quote=FormerSanDiegan]

Those who are hindered by this rule are those who buy a second house and rent out their first house as a rental property. These are your typical Mom & Pop landlords. Unlike the corporate-run large box apartment complexes, these are the people who typically rent out single-family homes. These are the folks you rent from that never raise the rent until you leave.

Perhaps you are right, maybe we should not encourage the mom & pops. The better approach is to allow all investment property to end up in the hands of corporate entities. To hell with the little guy.

[/quote]

Oh joy! So instead of being able to buy my own place, I can instead rent from some rich ‘mom and pop’ a-holes who were able to drive up the prices of multiple homes on the backs of government subsidies funded by me and other taxpayers. No thanks. I say end all housing subsidies so that the average person can afford a house again.

BTW, the only people I see raising rents these days are those same ‘mom and pops’ you speak so lovingly of. These are the same f***heads who will charge you a deposit equal to two months’ rent. I’ll stick to the big corporations and not get ripped off. Besides, the big corporations are actually lowering rents.

[TheBreeze]

[quote=FormerSanDiegan]

Those who are hindered by this rule are those who buy a second house and rent out their first house as a rental property. These are your typical Mom & Pop landlords. Unlike the corporate-run large box apartment complexes, these are the people who typically rent out single-family homes. These are the folks you rent from that never raise the rent until you leave.

Perhaps you are right, maybe we should not encourage the mom & pops. The better approach is to allow all investment property to end up in the hands of corporate entities. To hell with the little guy.

[/quote]

Oh joy! So instead of being able to buy my own place, I can instead rent from some rich ‘mom and pop’ a-holes who were able to drive up the prices of multiple homes on the backs of government subsidies funded by me and other taxpayers. No thanks. I say end all housing subsidies so that the average person can afford a house again.

BTW, the only people I see raising rents these days are those same ‘mom and pops’ you speak so lovingly of. These are the same f***heads who will charge you a deposit equal to two months’ rent. I’ll stick to the big corporations and not get ripped off. Besides, the big corporations are actually lowering rents.

[Author]

Posts