Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 12, 2009 at 7:40 PM in reply to: banks selling houses to friends for next to nothing #345450February 12, 2009 at 7:40 PM in reply to: banks selling houses to friends for next to nothing #345772
TheBreeze
ParticipantExcellent post, honest_abe. It seems as if no one gives a rat’s about having fair markets anymore. Everyone’s all about ‘how can I get mine?’
I would definitely encourage you to pursue this. I think SDR had a good suggestion above. If that doesn’t get you anywhere, you can try the FBI or even local law enforcement. Here’s the FBI’s contact in San Diego:
Unfortunately, it will probably be tough for you to get law enforcement to pursue a case like this. However, if the listing/RE agent committed fraud against the bank, and the bank wasn’t in on it, the bank might be able to get law enforcement involved.
I say pursue this thing to the hilt. I’m sick of seeing fraudulent transactions like this. My solution has been to just stay the heck away from the RE market since it seems to be the most crooked thing ever. However, if you really want to buy a house, you’re probably going to have to fight to get any kind of even moderately fair transaction. Our own government is going to be working against you getting a fair price pretty much every step of the way, so I wish you luck.
February 12, 2009 at 7:40 PM in reply to: banks selling houses to friends for next to nothing #345879ParticipantExcellent post, honest_abe. It seems as if no one gives a rat’s about having fair markets anymore. Everyone’s all about ‘how can I get mine?’
I would definitely encourage you to pursue this. I think SDR had a good suggestion above. If that doesn’t get you anywhere, you can try the FBI or even local law enforcement. Here’s the FBI’s contact in San Diego:
Unfortunately, it will probably be tough for you to get law enforcement to pursue a case like this. However, if the listing/RE agent committed fraud against the bank, and the bank wasn’t in on it, the bank might be able to get law enforcement involved.
I say pursue this thing to the hilt. I’m sick of seeing fraudulent transactions like this. My solution has been to just stay the heck away from the RE market since it seems to be the most crooked thing ever. However, if you really want to buy a house, you’re probably going to have to fight to get any kind of even moderately fair transaction. Our own government is going to be working against you getting a fair price pretty much every step of the way, so I wish you luck.
February 12, 2009 at 7:40 PM in reply to: banks selling houses to friends for next to nothing #345912ParticipantExcellent post, honest_abe. It seems as if no one gives a rat’s about having fair markets anymore. Everyone’s all about ‘how can I get mine?’
I would definitely encourage you to pursue this. I think SDR had a good suggestion above. If that doesn’t get you anywhere, you can try the FBI or even local law enforcement. Here’s the FBI’s contact in San Diego:
Unfortunately, it will probably be tough for you to get law enforcement to pursue a case like this. However, if the listing/RE agent committed fraud against the bank, and the bank wasn’t in on it, the bank might be able to get law enforcement involved.
I say pursue this thing to the hilt. I’m sick of seeing fraudulent transactions like this. My solution has been to just stay the heck away from the RE market since it seems to be the most crooked thing ever. However, if you really want to buy a house, you’re probably going to have to fight to get any kind of even moderately fair transaction. Our own government is going to be working against you getting a fair price pretty much every step of the way, so I wish you luck.
February 12, 2009 at 7:40 PM in reply to: banks selling houses to friends for next to nothing #346010ParticipantExcellent post, honest_abe. It seems as if no one gives a rat’s about having fair markets anymore. Everyone’s all about ‘how can I get mine?’
I would definitely encourage you to pursue this. I think SDR had a good suggestion above. If that doesn’t get you anywhere, you can try the FBI or even local law enforcement. Here’s the FBI’s contact in San Diego:
Unfortunately, it will probably be tough for you to get law enforcement to pursue a case like this. However, if the listing/RE agent committed fraud against the bank, and the bank wasn’t in on it, the bank might be able to get law enforcement involved.
I say pursue this thing to the hilt. I’m sick of seeing fraudulent transactions like this. My solution has been to just stay the heck away from the RE market since it seems to be the most crooked thing ever. However, if you really want to buy a house, you’re probably going to have to fight to get any kind of even moderately fair transaction. Our own government is going to be working against you getting a fair price pretty much every step of the way, so I wish you luck.
Participant[quote=rnen]Yep, thats the answer alright…. have the government control a single bank. That would solve all our problems, I mean look how successful the past administrations, BOTH Dem. and Rep., have been at running any programs. The astounding results of the Social Security program is all I need to see! How could we all have been so blind to the obvious answer to all of these problems… bigger and better government. Hey, we already have two people that could step in and run the bank so success would be assured and good times and prospierity for all would result… Barney Frank and Chuck Shumer!!
[/quote]
Not sure if you’ve been living under a rock or not, but pretty much all the big banks would be out of business if it weren’t for government/taxpayer dollars propping them up. The same fate would probably befall most of the small banks too. So what exactly is the point of your ridiculous rant?
Participant[quote=rnen]Yep, thats the answer alright…. have the government control a single bank. That would solve all our problems, I mean look how successful the past administrations, BOTH Dem. and Rep., have been at running any programs. The astounding results of the Social Security program is all I need to see! How could we all have been so blind to the obvious answer to all of these problems… bigger and better government. Hey, we already have two people that could step in and run the bank so success would be assured and good times and prospierity for all would result… Barney Frank and Chuck Shumer!!
[/quote]
Not sure if you’ve been living under a rock or not, but pretty much all the big banks would be out of business if it weren’t for government/taxpayer dollars propping them up. The same fate would probably befall most of the small banks too. So what exactly is the point of your ridiculous rant?
Participant[quote=rnen]Yep, thats the answer alright…. have the government control a single bank. That would solve all our problems, I mean look how successful the past administrations, BOTH Dem. and Rep., have been at running any programs. The astounding results of the Social Security program is all I need to see! How could we all have been so blind to the obvious answer to all of these problems… bigger and better government. Hey, we already have two people that could step in and run the bank so success would be assured and good times and prospierity for all would result… Barney Frank and Chuck Shumer!!
[/quote]
Not sure if you’ve been living under a rock or not, but pretty much all the big banks would be out of business if it weren’t for government/taxpayer dollars propping them up. The same fate would probably befall most of the small banks too. So what exactly is the point of your ridiculous rant?
Participant[quote=rnen]Yep, thats the answer alright…. have the government control a single bank. That would solve all our problems, I mean look how successful the past administrations, BOTH Dem. and Rep., have been at running any programs. The astounding results of the Social Security program is all I need to see! How could we all have been so blind to the obvious answer to all of these problems… bigger and better government. Hey, we already have two people that could step in and run the bank so success would be assured and good times and prospierity for all would result… Barney Frank and Chuck Shumer!!
[/quote]
Not sure if you’ve been living under a rock or not, but pretty much all the big banks would be out of business if it weren’t for government/taxpayer dollars propping them up. The same fate would probably befall most of the small banks too. So what exactly is the point of your ridiculous rant?
Participant[quote=rnen]Yep, thats the answer alright…. have the government control a single bank. That would solve all our problems, I mean look how successful the past administrations, BOTH Dem. and Rep., have been at running any programs. The astounding results of the Social Security program is all I need to see! How could we all have been so blind to the obvious answer to all of these problems… bigger and better government. Hey, we already have two people that could step in and run the bank so success would be assured and good times and prospierity for all would result… Barney Frank and Chuck Shumer!!
[/quote]
Not sure if you’ve been living under a rock or not, but pretty much all the big banks would be out of business if it weren’t for government/taxpayer dollars propping them up. The same fate would probably befall most of the small banks too. So what exactly is the point of your ridiculous rant?
Participant[quote=AN]flu, you took the words right out of my mouth. Breezie, where are you?[/quote]
LMAO! You faux fiscal conservatives are at it again. You jump all over a relatively measly $50 billion to the common man while totally ignoring the trillions in bailout money going to the super-rich banker class–can’t let the super-rich fall behind on their Maserati payments. Heaven forbid!
Let a hard-working common man who helped build this country get a half-a-food-stamp from the gubmint in order that he might not starve and you guys scream bloody murder. Meanwhile, the same rich a-holes who looted from all of us use the trillions in taxpayer bailout money to pay themselves hundreds of billions in bonuses and you guys look the other way. Pathetic.
I do have to say thought that I’m disappointed that Obama is not raising taxes on the super-rich. He’s looking more and more like a member of the good ol’ boys’ club all the time. It’s time for a change. Ralph Nader in ’12! If not Nader, we need an honest-to-goodness Marxist in charge. It’s better than this fascist, socialist BS we got going on now.
Participant[quote=AN]flu, you took the words right out of my mouth. Breezie, where are you?[/quote]
LMAO! You faux fiscal conservatives are at it again. You jump all over a relatively measly $50 billion to the common man while totally ignoring the trillions in bailout money going to the super-rich banker class–can’t let the super-rich fall behind on their Maserati payments. Heaven forbid!
Let a hard-working common man who helped build this country get a half-a-food-stamp from the gubmint in order that he might not starve and you guys scream bloody murder. Meanwhile, the same rich a-holes who looted from all of us use the trillions in taxpayer bailout money to pay themselves hundreds of billions in bonuses and you guys look the other way. Pathetic.
I do have to say thought that I’m disappointed that Obama is not raising taxes on the super-rich. He’s looking more and more like a member of the good ol’ boys’ club all the time. It’s time for a change. Ralph Nader in ’12! If not Nader, we need an honest-to-goodness Marxist in charge. It’s better than this fascist, socialist BS we got going on now.
Participant[quote=AN]flu, you took the words right out of my mouth. Breezie, where are you?[/quote]
LMAO! You faux fiscal conservatives are at it again. You jump all over a relatively measly $50 billion to the common man while totally ignoring the trillions in bailout money going to the super-rich banker class–can’t let the super-rich fall behind on their Maserati payments. Heaven forbid!
Let a hard-working common man who helped build this country get a half-a-food-stamp from the gubmint in order that he might not starve and you guys scream bloody murder. Meanwhile, the same rich a-holes who looted from all of us use the trillions in taxpayer bailout money to pay themselves hundreds of billions in bonuses and you guys look the other way. Pathetic.
I do have to say thought that I’m disappointed that Obama is not raising taxes on the super-rich. He’s looking more and more like a member of the good ol’ boys’ club all the time. It’s time for a change. Ralph Nader in ’12! If not Nader, we need an honest-to-goodness Marxist in charge. It’s better than this fascist, socialist BS we got going on now.
Participant[quote=AN]flu, you took the words right out of my mouth. Breezie, where are you?[/quote]
LMAO! You faux fiscal conservatives are at it again. You jump all over a relatively measly $50 billion to the common man while totally ignoring the trillions in bailout money going to the super-rich banker class–can’t let the super-rich fall behind on their Maserati payments. Heaven forbid!
Let a hard-working common man who helped build this country get a half-a-food-stamp from the gubmint in order that he might not starve and you guys scream bloody murder. Meanwhile, the same rich a-holes who looted from all of us use the trillions in taxpayer bailout money to pay themselves hundreds of billions in bonuses and you guys look the other way. Pathetic.
I do have to say thought that I’m disappointed that Obama is not raising taxes on the super-rich. He’s looking more and more like a member of the good ol’ boys’ club all the time. It’s time for a change. Ralph Nader in ’12! If not Nader, we need an honest-to-goodness Marxist in charge. It’s better than this fascist, socialist BS we got going on now.
Participant[quote=AN]flu, you took the words right out of my mouth. Breezie, where are you?[/quote]
LMAO! You faux fiscal conservatives are at it again. You jump all over a relatively measly $50 billion to the common man while totally ignoring the trillions in bailout money going to the super-rich banker class–can’t let the super-rich fall behind on their Maserati payments. Heaven forbid!
Let a hard-working common man who helped build this country get a half-a-food-stamp from the gubmint in order that he might not starve and you guys scream bloody murder. Meanwhile, the same rich a-holes who looted from all of us use the trillions in taxpayer bailout money to pay themselves hundreds of billions in bonuses and you guys look the other way. Pathetic.
I do have to say thought that I’m disappointed that Obama is not raising taxes on the super-rich. He’s looking more and more like a member of the good ol’ boys’ club all the time. It’s time for a change. Ralph Nader in ’12! If not Nader, we need an honest-to-goodness Marxist in charge. It’s better than this fascist, socialist BS we got going on now.
-
AuthorPosts
