[TheBreeze]

AN,

It sounds like you would be happiest in an anarcho-capitalist society. Anarcho-capitalism is capitalism in its purest form — with no rules or regulations to inhibit it.

Somalia is considered by many to be an anarcho-capitalist society. You should consider moving there so that you won’t have to be stifled by all the laws and regulations in America:

http://ethicalcorporation.blogspot.com/2007/04/anarcho-capitalism-in-somalia.html

[TheBreeze]

AN,

It sounds like you would be happiest in an anarcho-capitalist society. Anarcho-capitalism is capitalism in its purest form — with no rules or regulations to inhibit it.

Somalia is considered by many to be an anarcho-capitalist society. You should consider moving there so that you won’t have to be stifled by all the laws and regulations in America:

http://ethicalcorporation.blogspot.com/2007/04/anarcho-capitalism-in-somalia.html

[TheBreeze]

AN,

It sounds like you would be happiest in an anarcho-capitalist society. Anarcho-capitalism is capitalism in its purest form — with no rules or regulations to inhibit it.

Somalia is considered by many to be an anarcho-capitalist society. You should consider moving there so that you won’t have to be stifled by all the laws and regulations in America:

http://ethicalcorporation.blogspot.com/2007/04/anarcho-capitalism-in-somalia.html

[TheBreeze]

AN,

It sounds like you would be happiest in an anarcho-capitalist society. Anarcho-capitalism is capitalism in its purest form — with no rules or regulations to inhibit it.

Somalia is considered by many to be an anarcho-capitalist society. You should consider moving there so that you won’t have to be stifled by all the laws and regulations in America:

http://ethicalcorporation.blogspot.com/2007/04/anarcho-capitalism-in-somalia.html

[TheBreeze]

AN,

It sounds like you would be happiest in an anarcho-capitalist society. Anarcho-capitalism is capitalism in its purest form — with no rules or regulations to inhibit it.

Somalia is considered by many to be an anarcho-capitalist society. You should consider moving there so that you won’t have to be stifled by all the laws and regulations in America:

http://ethicalcorporation.blogspot.com/2007/04/anarcho-capitalism-in-somalia.html

[TheBreeze]

[quote=asianautica]
Why stop at $250k. We all know family making $100k or more is only ~15% of the total population. Why not increase taxes on any family making $100k and single making $50k or more to help the 85% of the population that make less than that. We should strive for this equality. I mean, it’s such a big injustice that 15% of the population probably control 99% of the wealth. I say, tax them all and tax them hard.[/quote]

Unlike you, I’m a moderate realist. Unbridled capitalism is as bad as unbridled communism in my opinion. I like Obama because he has a balanced approach. He’s going to raise taxes on the richards, but keep taxes about the same for those making less than $250K. You keep trying to mischaracterize Obama’s plan as communism when all it is really is a slight increase in tax burden on those who can best afford it.

As for small businesses, those under a certain number of employees should be exempted from having to pay health benefits and complying with regulations that larger businesses have to comply with. It’s called ‘balance’ and it’s what makes American society work.

[TheBreeze]

[quote=asianautica]
Why stop at $250k. We all know family making $100k or more is only ~15% of the total population. Why not increase taxes on any family making $100k and single making $50k or more to help the 85% of the population that make less than that. We should strive for this equality. I mean, it’s such a big injustice that 15% of the population probably control 99% of the wealth. I say, tax them all and tax them hard.[/quote]

Unlike you, I’m a moderate realist. Unbridled capitalism is as bad as unbridled communism in my opinion. I like Obama because he has a balanced approach. He’s going to raise taxes on the richards, but keep taxes about the same for those making less than $250K. You keep trying to mischaracterize Obama’s plan as communism when all it is really is a slight increase in tax burden on those who can best afford it.

As for small businesses, those under a certain number of employees should be exempted from having to pay health benefits and complying with regulations that larger businesses have to comply with. It’s called ‘balance’ and it’s what makes American society work.

[TheBreeze]

[quote=asianautica]
Why stop at $250k. We all know family making $100k or more is only ~15% of the total population. Why not increase taxes on any family making $100k and single making $50k or more to help the 85% of the population that make less than that. We should strive for this equality. I mean, it’s such a big injustice that 15% of the population probably control 99% of the wealth. I say, tax them all and tax them hard.[/quote]

Unlike you, I’m a moderate realist. Unbridled capitalism is as bad as unbridled communism in my opinion. I like Obama because he has a balanced approach. He’s going to raise taxes on the richards, but keep taxes about the same for those making less than $250K. You keep trying to mischaracterize Obama’s plan as communism when all it is really is a slight increase in tax burden on those who can best afford it.

As for small businesses, those under a certain number of employees should be exempted from having to pay health benefits and complying with regulations that larger businesses have to comply with. It’s called ‘balance’ and it’s what makes American society work.

[TheBreeze]

[quote=asianautica]
Why stop at $250k. We all know family making $100k or more is only ~15% of the total population. Why not increase taxes on any family making $100k and single making $50k or more to help the 85% of the population that make less than that. We should strive for this equality. I mean, it’s such a big injustice that 15% of the population probably control 99% of the wealth. I say, tax them all and tax them hard.[/quote]

Unlike you, I’m a moderate realist. Unbridled capitalism is as bad as unbridled communism in my opinion. I like Obama because he has a balanced approach. He’s going to raise taxes on the richards, but keep taxes about the same for those making less than $250K. You keep trying to mischaracterize Obama’s plan as communism when all it is really is a slight increase in tax burden on those who can best afford it.

As for small businesses, those under a certain number of employees should be exempted from having to pay health benefits and complying with regulations that larger businesses have to comply with. It’s called ‘balance’ and it’s what makes American society work.

[TheBreeze]

[quote=asianautica]
Why stop at $250k. We all know family making $100k or more is only ~15% of the total population. Why not increase taxes on any family making $100k and single making $50k or more to help the 85% of the population that make less than that. We should strive for this equality. I mean, it’s such a big injustice that 15% of the population probably control 99% of the wealth. I say, tax them all and tax them hard.[/quote]

Unlike you, I’m a moderate realist. Unbridled capitalism is as bad as unbridled communism in my opinion. I like Obama because he has a balanced approach. He’s going to raise taxes on the richards, but keep taxes about the same for those making less than $250K. You keep trying to mischaracterize Obama’s plan as communism when all it is really is a slight increase in tax burden on those who can best afford it.

As for small businesses, those under a certain number of employees should be exempted from having to pay health benefits and complying with regulations that larger businesses have to comply with. It’s called ‘balance’ and it’s what makes American society work.

[TheBreeze]

[quote=asianautica]
Not so fast. These are multinational companies. They could then have their permanent resident in some other country and get taxed in that country. [/quote]

Then we just change that rule too. Anyone deriving income from the U.S., regardless of citizenship, gets taxed.

I think we can both agree that the rich are scum and will try to do whatever they can to get out of paying taxes. You won’t get an argument from me on that. However, that doesn’t mean the government should just roll over and not try to tax these scumbags.

[TheBreeze]

[quote=asianautica]
Not so fast. These are multinational companies. They could then have their permanent resident in some other country and get taxed in that country. [/quote]

Then we just change that rule too. Anyone deriving income from the U.S., regardless of citizenship, gets taxed.

I think we can both agree that the rich are scum and will try to do whatever they can to get out of paying taxes. You won’t get an argument from me on that. However, that doesn’t mean the government should just roll over and not try to tax these scumbags.

[TheBreeze]

[quote=asianautica]
Not so fast. These are multinational companies. They could then have their permanent resident in some other country and get taxed in that country. [/quote]

Then we just change that rule too. Anyone deriving income from the U.S., regardless of citizenship, gets taxed.

I think we can both agree that the rich are scum and will try to do whatever they can to get out of paying taxes. You won’t get an argument from me on that. However, that doesn’t mean the government should just roll over and not try to tax these scumbags.

[TheBreeze]

[quote=asianautica]
Not so fast. These are multinational companies. They could then have their permanent resident in some other country and get taxed in that country. [/quote]

Then we just change that rule too. Anyone deriving income from the U.S., regardless of citizenship, gets taxed.

I think we can both agree that the rich are scum and will try to do whatever they can to get out of paying taxes. You won’t get an argument from me on that. However, that doesn’t mean the government should just roll over and not try to tax these scumbags.

[TheBreeze]

[quote=asianautica]
Not so fast. These are multinational companies. They could then have their permanent resident in some other country and get taxed in that country. [/quote]

Then we just change that rule too. Anyone deriving income from the U.S., regardless of citizenship, gets taxed.

I think we can both agree that the rich are scum and will try to do whatever they can to get out of paying taxes. You won’t get an argument from me on that. However, that doesn’t mean the government should just roll over and not try to tax these scumbags.

[Author]

Posts