[SK in CV]

[quote=bake]That should not be a problem if it is the same line of work and you had a good reason to take the time off. [/quote]

What’s a good reason? Is losing your job good enough? And what if the break is more than a few months, say maybe 9 months? Is there a standard minimum length of verifiable new employment before lenders will even consider making a loan?

[SK in CV]

[quote=bake]That should not be a problem if it is the same line of work and you had a good reason to take the time off. [/quote]

What’s a good reason? Is losing your job good enough? And what if the break is more than a few months, say maybe 9 months? Is there a standard minimum length of verifiable new employment before lenders will even consider making a loan?

[SK in CV]

[quote=bake]That should not be a problem if it is the same line of work and you had a good reason to take the time off. [/quote]

What’s a good reason? Is losing your job good enough? And what if the break is more than a few months, say maybe 9 months? Is there a standard minimum length of verifiable new employment before lenders will even consider making a loan?

[SK in CV]

[quote=bake]That should not be a problem if it is the same line of work and you had a good reason to take the time off. [/quote]

What’s a good reason? Is losing your job good enough? And what if the break is more than a few months, say maybe 9 months? Is there a standard minimum length of verifiable new employment before lenders will even consider making a loan?

[SK in CV]

Poltergeist.

Seriously, at 2 AM, when there is no water running through your pipes, it’s really unlikely that it’s the water pipes making the sound. All of the responses so far seem to have followed your lead, and tried to explain why the pipes are creaking. In Vegas? During a summer night? If it’s not the toilets running, it probably has nothing to do with water unless there’s a leak. Water hammer is a result of moving water, as is the clicking that some older meters can cause. Thermal creaking is the result of rapidly changing temperature. All highly unlikely at 2 AM.

On the other hand, in the middle of the night?

Dude, it’s ghosts.

[SK in CV]

Poltergeist.

Seriously, at 2 AM, when there is no water running through your pipes, it’s really unlikely that it’s the water pipes making the sound. All of the responses so far seem to have followed your lead, and tried to explain why the pipes are creaking. In Vegas? During a summer night? If it’s not the toilets running, it probably has nothing to do with water unless there’s a leak. Water hammer is a result of moving water, as is the clicking that some older meters can cause. Thermal creaking is the result of rapidly changing temperature. All highly unlikely at 2 AM.

On the other hand, in the middle of the night?

Dude, it’s ghosts.

[SK in CV]

Poltergeist.

Seriously, at 2 AM, when there is no water running through your pipes, it’s really unlikely that it’s the water pipes making the sound. All of the responses so far seem to have followed your lead, and tried to explain why the pipes are creaking. In Vegas? During a summer night? If it’s not the toilets running, it probably has nothing to do with water unless there’s a leak. Water hammer is a result of moving water, as is the clicking that some older meters can cause. Thermal creaking is the result of rapidly changing temperature. All highly unlikely at 2 AM.

On the other hand, in the middle of the night?

Dude, it’s ghosts.

[SK in CV]

Poltergeist.

Seriously, at 2 AM, when there is no water running through your pipes, it’s really unlikely that it’s the water pipes making the sound. All of the responses so far seem to have followed your lead, and tried to explain why the pipes are creaking. In Vegas? During a summer night? If it’s not the toilets running, it probably has nothing to do with water unless there’s a leak. Water hammer is a result of moving water, as is the clicking that some older meters can cause. Thermal creaking is the result of rapidly changing temperature. All highly unlikely at 2 AM.

On the other hand, in the middle of the night?

Dude, it’s ghosts.

[SK in CV]

Poltergeist.

Seriously, at 2 AM, when there is no water running through your pipes, it’s really unlikely that it’s the water pipes making the sound. All of the responses so far seem to have followed your lead, and tried to explain why the pipes are creaking. In Vegas? During a summer night? If it’s not the toilets running, it probably has nothing to do with water unless there’s a leak. Water hammer is a result of moving water, as is the clicking that some older meters can cause. Thermal creaking is the result of rapidly changing temperature. All highly unlikely at 2 AM.

On the other hand, in the middle of the night?

Dude, it’s ghosts.

[SK in CV]

[quote=AN][quote=jpinpb][quote=AN]Here’s his view on abortion:
http://www.ronpaul.com/on-the-issues/abortion/
“Ron Paul believes that the ninth and tenth amendments to the U.S. Constitution do not grant the federal government any authority to legalize or ban abortion. Instead, it is up to the individual states to prohibit abortion.”
[/quote]

So I understand, libertarian means less government involvement, so less federal laws, but more state laws prohitibing things?[/quote]
Or more state law to allow/encourage things. Not all laws prohibit things. The main point is, not all laws work for everyone everywhere. In those cases, there shouldn’t be a federal law. Laws like no murdering people should be a federal law. Laws like legalizing marijuana should be left up to the states.[/quote]

You can frame it anyway you want, but Paul is in favor of state laws prohibiting gay marriage and abortion, and opposes the federal government enforcing the full faith and credit clause of the constitution. Neither libertarian nor constitutional. (And you are aware that there are only limited federal laws against murder? I think they’re just primarily applicable in cases of kidnapping and terrorism. And a few others, like…you can’t kill the President. It is primarily an issue of state jurisdiction.) I’m with Paul on the marijuana laws. It should be governed by states, just as the sale of alcohol is. Unfortunately the federal government has no respect for these state laws.

[SK in CV]

[quote=AN][quote=jpinpb][quote=AN]Here’s his view on abortion:
http://www.ronpaul.com/on-the-issues/abortion/
“Ron Paul believes that the ninth and tenth amendments to the U.S. Constitution do not grant the federal government any authority to legalize or ban abortion. Instead, it is up to the individual states to prohibit abortion.”
[/quote]

So I understand, libertarian means less government involvement, so less federal laws, but more state laws prohitibing things?[/quote]
Or more state law to allow/encourage things. Not all laws prohibit things. The main point is, not all laws work for everyone everywhere. In those cases, there shouldn’t be a federal law. Laws like no murdering people should be a federal law. Laws like legalizing marijuana should be left up to the states.[/quote]

You can frame it anyway you want, but Paul is in favor of state laws prohibiting gay marriage and abortion, and opposes the federal government enforcing the full faith and credit clause of the constitution. Neither libertarian nor constitutional. (And you are aware that there are only limited federal laws against murder? I think they’re just primarily applicable in cases of kidnapping and terrorism. And a few others, like…you can’t kill the President. It is primarily an issue of state jurisdiction.) I’m with Paul on the marijuana laws. It should be governed by states, just as the sale of alcohol is. Unfortunately the federal government has no respect for these state laws.

[SK in CV]

[quote=AN][quote=jpinpb][quote=AN]Here’s his view on abortion:
http://www.ronpaul.com/on-the-issues/abortion/
“Ron Paul believes that the ninth and tenth amendments to the U.S. Constitution do not grant the federal government any authority to legalize or ban abortion. Instead, it is up to the individual states to prohibit abortion.”
[/quote]

So I understand, libertarian means less government involvement, so less federal laws, but more state laws prohitibing things?[/quote]
Or more state law to allow/encourage things. Not all laws prohibit things. The main point is, not all laws work for everyone everywhere. In those cases, there shouldn’t be a federal law. Laws like no murdering people should be a federal law. Laws like legalizing marijuana should be left up to the states.[/quote]

You can frame it anyway you want, but Paul is in favor of state laws prohibiting gay marriage and abortion, and opposes the federal government enforcing the full faith and credit clause of the constitution. Neither libertarian nor constitutional. (And you are aware that there are only limited federal laws against murder? I think they’re just primarily applicable in cases of kidnapping and terrorism. And a few others, like…you can’t kill the President. It is primarily an issue of state jurisdiction.) I’m with Paul on the marijuana laws. It should be governed by states, just as the sale of alcohol is. Unfortunately the federal government has no respect for these state laws.

[SK in CV]

[quote=AN][quote=jpinpb][quote=AN]Here’s his view on abortion:
http://www.ronpaul.com/on-the-issues/abortion/
“Ron Paul believes that the ninth and tenth amendments to the U.S. Constitution do not grant the federal government any authority to legalize or ban abortion. Instead, it is up to the individual states to prohibit abortion.”
[/quote]

So I understand, libertarian means less government involvement, so less federal laws, but more state laws prohitibing things?[/quote]
Or more state law to allow/encourage things. Not all laws prohibit things. The main point is, not all laws work for everyone everywhere. In those cases, there shouldn’t be a federal law. Laws like no murdering people should be a federal law. Laws like legalizing marijuana should be left up to the states.[/quote]

You can frame it anyway you want, but Paul is in favor of state laws prohibiting gay marriage and abortion, and opposes the federal government enforcing the full faith and credit clause of the constitution. Neither libertarian nor constitutional. (And you are aware that there are only limited federal laws against murder? I think they’re just primarily applicable in cases of kidnapping and terrorism. And a few others, like…you can’t kill the President. It is primarily an issue of state jurisdiction.) I’m with Paul on the marijuana laws. It should be governed by states, just as the sale of alcohol is. Unfortunately the federal government has no respect for these state laws.

[SK in CV]

[quote=AN][quote=jpinpb][quote=AN]Here’s his view on abortion:
http://www.ronpaul.com/on-the-issues/abortion/
“Ron Paul believes that the ninth and tenth amendments to the U.S. Constitution do not grant the federal government any authority to legalize or ban abortion. Instead, it is up to the individual states to prohibit abortion.”
[/quote]

So I understand, libertarian means less government involvement, so less federal laws, but more state laws prohitibing things?[/quote]
Or more state law to allow/encourage things. Not all laws prohibit things. The main point is, not all laws work for everyone everywhere. In those cases, there shouldn’t be a federal law. Laws like no murdering people should be a federal law. Laws like legalizing marijuana should be left up to the states.[/quote]

You can frame it anyway you want, but Paul is in favor of state laws prohibiting gay marriage and abortion, and opposes the federal government enforcing the full faith and credit clause of the constitution. Neither libertarian nor constitutional. (And you are aware that there are only limited federal laws against murder? I think they’re just primarily applicable in cases of kidnapping and terrorism. And a few others, like…you can’t kill the President. It is primarily an issue of state jurisdiction.) I’m with Paul on the marijuana laws. It should be governed by states, just as the sale of alcohol is. Unfortunately the federal government has no respect for these state laws.

[SK in CV]

[quote=walterwhite]henry ford thought the jews were planning a giant conspiracy. he was kind of a wackadoodle.[/quote]

That’s a bit of an understatement. He bought a newspaper so he could publish the fraudulent “Protocols of the Elders of Zion”, and continued with daily additional anti-semetic rants, eventually publishing them as a book. A copy of which was found in Hitler’s bedroom, with laudatory handwritten notes. Understandable, they were brothers in thought. His name should be synonymous with Benedict Arnold. Treasonous, or guilty of sedition at least. I don’t really know much about Steve Jobs outside of Apple. But I suspect in comparison to Ford, he’s a saint.

[Author]

Posts