Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
sdsurfer
Participant[quote=Kingside]I also live in Encinitas and have investment property in both Encinitas and Escondido.
I agree with the statement that Encinitas is easier to self manage than Escondido.
I would not consider currently buying a SFR in Encinitas for investment based on current prices since they don’t really cash flow, even with the current record low rates.
I think it is a mistake to think in terms of only SFRs if part of your thinking is that you want to invest in a place that you yourself would consider living in. That is a false comfort zone. Also, if you are new and not sure you are comfortable being a landlord, going very low end might be less risk if you decide you don’t like being a landlord and want to bail. The lower end is a bit more liquid of a market.
So I would not only be looking at condos, but would be looking at 2-4 unit multifamily as well. There are a lot of older 2-4 multi=family properties in Escondido. They tend to cash flow much better than SFRs, if you can buy right.[/quote]
Thanks for the sound advice Kingside. Having done it in both areas would you say the peace of mind or closer to it is a good trade off for the additional cash flow from the Escondido properties? I just had a look and there actually are a couple triplexes out there in the 4s that would cash flow better, but they look pretty old. The ones I noticed were on the fruit streets (grape & orange) and appeared to cash flow pretty good from day one. Any experience in those areas yourself? Thank you!sdsurfer
Participant[quote=Kingside]I also live in Encinitas and have investment property in both Encinitas and Escondido.
I agree with the statement that Encinitas is easier to self manage than Escondido.
I would not consider currently buying a SFR in Encinitas for investment based on current prices since they don’t really cash flow, even with the current record low rates.
I think it is a mistake to think in terms of only SFRs if part of your thinking is that you want to invest in a place that you yourself would consider living in. That is a false comfort zone. Also, if you are new and not sure you are comfortable being a landlord, going very low end might be less risk if you decide you don’t like being a landlord and want to bail. The lower end is a bit more liquid of a market.
So I would not only be looking at condos, but would be looking at 2-4 unit multifamily as well. There are a lot of older 2-4 multi=family properties in Escondido. They tend to cash flow much better than SFRs, if you can buy right.[/quote]
Thanks for the sound advice Kingside. Having done it in both areas would you say the peace of mind or closer to it is a good trade off for the additional cash flow from the Escondido properties? I just had a look and there actually are a couple triplexes out there in the 4s that would cash flow better, but they look pretty old. The ones I noticed were on the fruit streets (grape & orange) and appeared to cash flow pretty good from day one. Any experience in those areas yourself? Thank you!sdsurfer
Participant[quote=Kingside]I also live in Encinitas and have investment property in both Encinitas and Escondido.
I agree with the statement that Encinitas is easier to self manage than Escondido.
I would not consider currently buying a SFR in Encinitas for investment based on current prices since they don’t really cash flow, even with the current record low rates.
I think it is a mistake to think in terms of only SFRs if part of your thinking is that you want to invest in a place that you yourself would consider living in. That is a false comfort zone. Also, if you are new and not sure you are comfortable being a landlord, going very low end might be less risk if you decide you don’t like being a landlord and want to bail. The lower end is a bit more liquid of a market.
So I would not only be looking at condos, but would be looking at 2-4 unit multifamily as well. There are a lot of older 2-4 multi=family properties in Escondido. They tend to cash flow much better than SFRs, if you can buy right.[/quote]
Thanks for the sound advice Kingside. Having done it in both areas would you say the peace of mind or closer to it is a good trade off for the additional cash flow from the Escondido properties? I just had a look and there actually are a couple triplexes out there in the 4s that would cash flow better, but they look pretty old. The ones I noticed were on the fruit streets (grape & orange) and appeared to cash flow pretty good from day one. Any experience in those areas yourself? Thank you!sdsurfer
Participant[quote=Kingside]I also live in Encinitas and have investment property in both Encinitas and Escondido.
I agree with the statement that Encinitas is easier to self manage than Escondido.
I would not consider currently buying a SFR in Encinitas for investment based on current prices since they don’t really cash flow, even with the current record low rates.
I think it is a mistake to think in terms of only SFRs if part of your thinking is that you want to invest in a place that you yourself would consider living in. That is a false comfort zone. Also, if you are new and not sure you are comfortable being a landlord, going very low end might be less risk if you decide you don’t like being a landlord and want to bail. The lower end is a bit more liquid of a market.
So I would not only be looking at condos, but would be looking at 2-4 unit multifamily as well. There are a lot of older 2-4 multi=family properties in Escondido. They tend to cash flow much better than SFRs, if you can buy right.[/quote]
Thanks for the sound advice Kingside. Having done it in both areas would you say the peace of mind or closer to it is a good trade off for the additional cash flow from the Escondido properties? I just had a look and there actually are a couple triplexes out there in the 4s that would cash flow better, but they look pretty old. The ones I noticed were on the fruit streets (grape & orange) and appeared to cash flow pretty good from day one. Any experience in those areas yourself? Thank you!sdsurfer
Participant[quote=Kingside]I also live in Encinitas and have investment property in both Encinitas and Escondido.
I agree with the statement that Encinitas is easier to self manage than Escondido.
I would not consider currently buying a SFR in Encinitas for investment based on current prices since they don’t really cash flow, even with the current record low rates.
I think it is a mistake to think in terms of only SFRs if part of your thinking is that you want to invest in a place that you yourself would consider living in. That is a false comfort zone. Also, if you are new and not sure you are comfortable being a landlord, going very low end might be less risk if you decide you don’t like being a landlord and want to bail. The lower end is a bit more liquid of a market.
So I would not only be looking at condos, but would be looking at 2-4 unit multifamily as well. There are a lot of older 2-4 multi=family properties in Escondido. They tend to cash flow much better than SFRs, if you can buy right.[/quote]
Thanks for the sound advice Kingside. Having done it in both areas would you say the peace of mind or closer to it is a good trade off for the additional cash flow from the Escondido properties? I just had a look and there actually are a couple triplexes out there in the 4s that would cash flow better, but they look pretty old. The ones I noticed were on the fruit streets (grape & orange) and appeared to cash flow pretty good from day one. Any experience in those areas yourself? Thank you!sdsurfer
ParticipantInteresting you went all cash with rates so low…I’d imagine you just did’nt want to deal with the hassle of getting a loan? 10% seems pretty good to me! Thanks for mentioning that…it means a lot more to me since your speaking from recent experience and it went well.
sdsurfer
ParticipantInteresting you went all cash with rates so low…I’d imagine you just did’nt want to deal with the hassle of getting a loan? 10% seems pretty good to me! Thanks for mentioning that…it means a lot more to me since your speaking from recent experience and it went well.
sdsurfer
ParticipantInteresting you went all cash with rates so low…I’d imagine you just did’nt want to deal with the hassle of getting a loan? 10% seems pretty good to me! Thanks for mentioning that…it means a lot more to me since your speaking from recent experience and it went well.
sdsurfer
ParticipantInteresting you went all cash with rates so low…I’d imagine you just did’nt want to deal with the hassle of getting a loan? 10% seems pretty good to me! Thanks for mentioning that…it means a lot more to me since your speaking from recent experience and it went well.
sdsurfer
ParticipantInteresting you went all cash with rates so low…I’d imagine you just did’nt want to deal with the hassle of getting a loan? 10% seems pretty good to me! Thanks for mentioning that…it means a lot more to me since your speaking from recent experience and it went well.
sdsurfer
ParticipantMuch appreciated and I was thinking along those lines myself. Since I’m not expecting a lot of appreciation right away that would lead to inland being better short term, but then the coastal stuff would have a better long term benefit because they are making anymore land by the beach and when the appreciation kicks in, which I know it will eventually, I’d be glad I went coastal. I’m also on the fence regarding self management if it was coastal and if I went esco I would definitely get a management company.
Do you mind me asking what you would do?
sdsurfer
ParticipantMuch appreciated and I was thinking along those lines myself. Since I’m not expecting a lot of appreciation right away that would lead to inland being better short term, but then the coastal stuff would have a better long term benefit because they are making anymore land by the beach and when the appreciation kicks in, which I know it will eventually, I’d be glad I went coastal. I’m also on the fence regarding self management if it was coastal and if I went esco I would definitely get a management company.
Do you mind me asking what you would do?
sdsurfer
ParticipantMuch appreciated and I was thinking along those lines myself. Since I’m not expecting a lot of appreciation right away that would lead to inland being better short term, but then the coastal stuff would have a better long term benefit because they are making anymore land by the beach and when the appreciation kicks in, which I know it will eventually, I’d be glad I went coastal. I’m also on the fence regarding self management if it was coastal and if I went esco I would definitely get a management company.
Do you mind me asking what you would do?
sdsurfer
ParticipantMuch appreciated and I was thinking along those lines myself. Since I’m not expecting a lot of appreciation right away that would lead to inland being better short term, but then the coastal stuff would have a better long term benefit because they are making anymore land by the beach and when the appreciation kicks in, which I know it will eventually, I’d be glad I went coastal. I’m also on the fence regarding self management if it was coastal and if I went esco I would definitely get a management company.
Do you mind me asking what you would do?
-
AuthorPosts
